Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 20:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Having an f/1.4 lens and not using it wide open ...

 
trickydan
Member
177 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Mar 30, 2011 08:12 |  #46

Bend The Light wrote in post #12122963 (external link)
If you have a faster lens, say a 1.4 as opposed to a 2.8, then would the sweet spot be at a slightly wider aperture? This would mean you would get the benefit of sharper images whilst using a wider aperture (but still not have to use the widest)

^this is how ive always thought of it and is the reason i love shooting primes over zoom - super sharp images at 2.5 on a 1.4 lens!


trickydan's website! (external link)
gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Mar 30, 2011 08:26 |  #47

rusty.jg wrote in post #12123334 (external link)
It looks like the restriction to an apparent f/3.5 through the view finder only applies to the 7D (see post number 25 onwards):
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=844294

However I know I read it somewhere else as well that in some cases the viewfinder will not show the DoF of fast lenses. I will see if I can dig further....

My T2i won't show DoF at 1.4, but will from 1.6 and down. :confused:


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Mar 30, 2011 10:11 |  #48

Bend The Light wrote in post #12122963 (external link)
Related to this, can you tell me:

A lens has a sweet spot in the aperture which is not at it's widest, and not at it's smallest.

If you have a faster lens, say a 1.4 as opposed to a 2.8, then would the sweet spot be at a slightly wider aperture? This would mean you would get the benefit of sharper images whilst using a wider aperture (but still not have to use the widest).

Absolutely. I've had 50 f/1.4 lenses from Sigma and Canon and both of them were acceptable at f/1.4 but amazing starting at f/2.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Mar 30, 2011 10:14 |  #49

1Tanker wrote in post #12123437 (external link)
My T2i won't show DoF at 1.4, but will from 1.6 and down. :confused:

Do you mean to say that nothing happens when you press the DOF preview button? If so, the aperture is at already at f/1.4 so of course nothing happens when you press that button. What could happen?


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Mar 30, 2011 10:17 |  #50

rusty.jg wrote in post #12123334 (external link)
It looks like the restriction to an apparent f/3.5 through the view finder only applies to the 7D (see post number 25 onwards):
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=844294

However I know I read it somewhere else as well that in some cases the viewfinder will not show the DoF of fast lenses. I will see if I can dig further....

This is well documented and I'm pretty sure it is explained in the user's manuals. The only thing about the 7D that is different than other Canon SLRs is that the 7D focus screen cannot be removed. Other cameras have user-replaceable focus screens so that you can put in a focus screen that will show the more narrow depth of field. The trade-off is that the viewfinder will be very dark when using lenses that only open up to f/4 or f/5.6.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Mar 30, 2011 12:48 |  #51

krb wrote in post #12124034 (external link)
Do you mean to say that nothing happens when you press the DOF preview button? If so, the aperture is at already at f/1.4 so of course nothing happens when you press that button. What could happen?

Doh! :o I'm gonna go to bed now.


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JHutch
Senior Member
Avatar
595 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
     
Mar 30, 2011 17:37 |  #52

1Tanker wrote in post #12125085 (external link)
Doh! :o I'm gonna go to bed now.

bw!


D700+Voigtlander 40mm+Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 ai-s

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3075
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Mar 30, 2011 19:37 |  #53

Bend The Light wrote in post #12122963 (external link)
Related to this, can you tell me:

A lens has a sweet spot in the aperture which is not at it's widest, and not at it's smallest.

If you have a faster lens, say a 1.4 as opposed to a 2.8, then would the sweet spot be at a slightly wider aperture? This would mean you would get the benefit of sharper images whilst using a wider aperture (but still not have to use the widest).


Cheers

it honestly depends

Theres a lot of zooms out there that are pretty much as sharp at f/2.8 as say a 50mm prime at f/2.8..The 17-55 comes to mind as my copy and someone elses both performed just as well if not better than the 50 at f/2.8...

I know my Sigmalux stopped down a little is easily one of my sharpest lenses, however Not necessarily sharper than my 15-85 at f/5.6-8 and since it lacks IS if im not using it at wide apertures id rather use my 15-85...


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 30, 2011 20:25 |  #54

I just came across this thread, and have gotten some chuckles -- how do we thoughtfully respond to a remard that is not well-thought-out:)? Not to act like a jerk and yet send the asker a little reminder to think twice before they make a remark that carries a criticism in it? Like "it sure was dumb of you to buy that f/1.4 lens..."

Just take the replies that have been mentioned and wrap them in a nutshell and toss it out:

You get a very sharp f/2 lens!

You get a nice wide opening that can give some assistance to AF but is also a real benefit if you are doing Manual Focusing because you can use that wide aperture/narrow DOF to really nail your AF with precision using Live View or using a add-on focusing screen!

And, hey, you may not be in the habit of shooting f/1.4 but dang it, when you want to it's there for your creative use!

And then say something like "See, I'm not as dumb as you think!":)!

Hey, when I shoot with my 85L or 50 1.4, I very often have them stopped down to whatever gives me the depth of field that I want. So what? If I want to go wide open I can, which I occasionally do for the creative narrow DOF if I decide it will "fit". And, because I do this thoughtfully I typically get rewarded with some nice results, although also typically ones where I messed up with movement/camera shake, but hey, that's the price you pay:)!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,646 views & 0 likes for this thread, 32 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Having an f/1.4 lens and not using it wide open ...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1127 guests, 188 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.