Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 30 Mar 2011 (Wednesday) 11:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lens ? for an accountant

 
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 30, 2011 12:51 |  #16

BigBlueDodge wrote in post #12125068 (external link)
You depreciate to lower your tax basis. If you pay no taxes then there is no need to depreciate your gear. In fact, I personally wouldn't do it, as I stated previously, any item that you depreciate is the property of your business, and requires that you track,and report any sales later. If you don't need the tax write off (which you don't since you pay no taxes), then just keep it as a personal item.

^^ yes,
Why even bother with any of this?
Unless you are making significant money on buying and selling lens it's not worth it!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lost ­ canadian
Member
48 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Mar 30, 2011 12:53 |  #17

If you plan to sell the lenses in the future, you could 'sell' them to yourself first for he depreciated/residual value. Anything you do w/ the lenses after that will not be on the books.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 30, 2011 12:59 |  #18

lost canadian wrote in post #12125112 (external link)
If you plan to sell the lenses in the future, you could 'sell' them to yourself first for he depreciated/residual value. Anything you do w/ the lenses after that will not be on the books.

You have to be careful selling it to yourself for less than market value. If you get audited, they'll decide you owe tax on the gain.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaxn
Member
84 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Nashville
     
Mar 30, 2011 15:43 |  #19

Take the depreciation and then you could give it as a charitable contribution to me!!!! :)

I'll even give you a receipt!

No profit taxes, and you get to deduct the depreciation expense! Everyone wins!!!!


5Diii | 7D | EF 16-35L ii | EF 24-70L ii | EF 70-200L ii | EF 100L | TS-E 24L ii | EF 85L ii | 600EX-RT x2
flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Mar 30, 2011 15:58 |  #20

Guess I am sorry I asked, the fog is thickening.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cacawcacaw
Goldmember
Avatar
2,862 posts
Likes: 19
Joined May 2010
Location: Ventura, California
     
Mar 30, 2011 16:06 |  #21

Gasrocks, ask your tax preparer for an explanation and then decide if you need to switch to another professional.

Trying to get your question answered by an uninformed amateur committee is probably the worst thing you can do. We don't even know if you have a photography business or whether your idea of "I pay no taxes" means that you actually pay no taxes or means that you don't owe additional money when you file your return.


Replacing my Canon 7D, Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 17-55mm, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.4, and 150-500mm with a Panasonic Lumix FZ1000. I still have the 17-55 and the 30 available for sale.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Mar 30, 2011 18:04 |  #22

Yes, I see my CPA tomorrow and will ask some questions. This whole idea of a lens is worth nothing after it is 5 years old bothers me.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Mar 30, 2011 18:14 |  #23

gasrocks wrote in post #12127142 (external link)
Yes, I see my CPA tomorrow and will ask some questions. This whole idea of a lens is worth nothing after it is 5 years old bothers me.

yes, have a conversation with your accountant. Clear up those misconceptions !




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Mar 30, 2011 18:30 |  #24

I doubt he can clear my head ever when it comes to accounting. About equal to my trying to teach him lenses.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 30, 2011 18:59 |  #25

gasrocks wrote in post #12127142 (external link)
Yes, I see my CPA tomorrow and will ask some questions. This whole idea of a lens is worth nothing after it is 5 years old bothers me.

Its not about saying its worth nothing after 5 years. Its about fairly spreading out its cost over the years in which it generates revenue.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Velorium
Senior Member
493 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
     
Mar 30, 2011 20:36 |  #26

gasrocks wrote in post #12127313 (external link)
I doubt he can clear my head ever when it comes to accounting.

Perhaps I'm overstepping the bounds of being polite, but if your accountant can't clear your head about accounting, maybe you need a new accountant.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
napster90
Member
90 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Mar 30, 2011 22:03 |  #27

gasrocks wrote in post #12126249 (external link)
Guess I am sorry I asked, the fog is thickening.

I would try to put this two scenarios to try to clarify this situation.

Assume that you buy your manual focus lens for $100, depreciate it over 5 years at $20 per year and your tax rate at 30%.

Scenario 1: you sold it at the end of year 2 for $120 (real gain $20)
Year 1: Depreciate your lens $20. Book value of the lens at the end of year 1: $80. Tax credit $20*30%=$6. You get $6 tax credit.
Year 2: Depreciate your lens $20. Book value of the lens at the end of year 2: $60. Tax credit $20*30%=$6. You get $6 tax credit.
You sold the lens for $120 and gain $60 over your current book value of the lens ($60). The tax you pay for the gain $60*30%=$18.
Over 2 year you paid $6 tax which is exactly 30% of your $20 gain selling the lens at $120.

Scenario 2: you sold it at the end of year 2 for $80 (real loss $20)
Year 1: Depreciate your lens $20. Book value of the lens at the end of year 1: $80. Tax credit $20*30%=$6. You get $6 tax credit.
Year 2: Depreciate your lens $20. Book value of the lens at the end of year 2: $60. Tax credit $20*30%=$6. You get $6 tax credit.
You sold the lens for $100 and gain $20 over your current book value of the lens ($60). The tax you pay for the gain $20*30%=$6.
Over 2 year you earn $6 tax credit which is exactly 30% of your $20 loss selling the lens of $80.

My calculation is theoretical since I am Finance major, not an Accounting major but if you have any questions let me know :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cacawcacaw
Goldmember
Avatar
2,862 posts
Likes: 19
Joined May 2010
Location: Ventura, California
     
Mar 31, 2011 01:25 |  #28

gasrocks wrote in post #12127142 (external link)
Yes, I see my CPA tomorrow and will ask some questions. This whole idea of a lens is worth nothing after it is 5 years old bothers me.

Your accountant is not saying that the lens is worth nothing after five years.

He is saying that the tax laws allow you to deduct the cost of the lens from your income, just not all at once. The tax laws are very specific about how much of an expense you can deduct per year, but the laws don't have anything to do with how much the property is worth after those tax deductions.

For example, you can depreciate a real estate rental investment over 27.5 years and take a maximum of 1/27.5 deduction each year (for a $275,000 property, that would be $10,000 per year). However, that doesn't mean that at the end of 27.5 years the house is worthless. The law simply tells you over how many years you are required to spread out the deduction.


Replacing my Canon 7D, Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 17-55mm, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.4, and 150-500mm with a Panasonic Lumix FZ1000. I still have the 17-55 and the 30 available for sale.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Mar 31, 2011 07:59 |  #29

Thanks everyone. Like I said I am in a fog when it comes to accounting. I'll ask him a few questions and then I'll probably go on and find something else to worry about.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cacawcacaw
Goldmember
Avatar
2,862 posts
Likes: 19
Joined May 2010
Location: Ventura, California
     
Mar 31, 2011 12:04 |  #30

gasrocks wrote in post #12130345 (external link)
Thanks everyone. Like I said I am in a fog when it comes to accounting. I'll ask him a few questions and then I'll probably go on and find something else to worry about.

I like to figure things out and hate hiring someone to do things for me. So, for years and years I did my own taxes.

Then I had a couple of complicated years and realized that completing a tax form isn't like building something. The only way to really learn how to prepare tax returns is through lots of experience with the IRS; learning what they expect, what they will or won't accept, and knowing what triggers their computers to call for an audit.

My tax preparer saves me money, makes me more honest, and protects me from audits, all at the same time and for very little cost. The key component is that I trust him 100%.


Replacing my Canon 7D, Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 17-55mm, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.4, and 150-500mm with a Panasonic Lumix FZ1000. I still have the 17-55 and the 30 available for sale.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,073 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Lens ? for an accountant
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
937 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.