Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 30 Mar 2011 (Wednesday) 15:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Resizing for projection?

 
Pete328
Member
36 posts
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
Location: central Canada...eh
     
Mar 30, 2011 15:15 |  #1

Is resizing (downwards from 4272 x 2848 pixels) desirable to give the best quality display when presenting images via an LCD projector?
If so, and the "native" resolution of a projector is not known, is there a standard reliable size in terms of maximum pixel width and/or height that will give a large good quality display in most instances?

Advice or comments, anyone?


Pete

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Mar 30, 2011 16:30 |  #2

Well, different projectors do have different resolutions. If you want a "one size fits all" image size my suggestion would be to research what projectors are in common use. Then, I'd probably suggest picking the highest standard resolution and sizing your image to fit that, do an appropriate amount of "output sharpening", and then figure that the lower-res projectors will "shrink" the image without too much loss whereas the higher-res projectors will keep the higher quality.

That's the approach I would also take for preparing "slides" to display on HD TVs -- size them for 1080 so that the higher res displays get full quality, but I wouldn't expect a 720 set to botch things up.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peano
Goldmember
Avatar
1,778 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2007
     
Mar 30, 2011 16:45 |  #3

Pete328 wrote in post #12125949 (external link)
Is resizing (downwards from 4272 x 2848 pixels) desirable to give the best quality display when presenting images via an LCD projector?

What make and model is the projector?


---
Peano
RadiantPics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Mar 30, 2011 18:49 |  #4

I would never make resolution higher than 1920x1080, as that is the usual highest resolution you will encounter (other than the megabuck projectors). There can be considerable loss of quality when a projector deviates from its 'native' resolution, even when it is rated to be able to display some higher resolution! And that is why I would not routinely size for any larger than 1920x1080.

Projection is where digital has greatly fallen behind the quality of slide film...we are able to project 2Mpixel images at best!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete328
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
36 posts
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
Location: central Canada...eh
     
Apr 01, 2011 10:01 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #5

Thanks for your replies.

As per my original post, I do not have information on the specific projector to be used. Researching common resolutions, on the lower end are XGA projectors (1024x768) (4:3 ratio) and on the high end are rarer ones that get up into the 1080 pixel height range, and a 16:9 aspect ratio. Since I only will be displaying 16 photos, I used the Image Processor script in Photoshop (Bridge) to quickly produce two sets - one at max. 1024x768 resolution, and the other at max. 1920x1080. If the latter set won't display properly, I will switch to the lower resolution one.

There's lots of information about resizing images for printing, web display and e-mailing, but very little about optimizing for projection. Your thoughts and comments are appreciated.


Pete

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,371 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Resizing for projection?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1074 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.