Our little girl turned 5 yesterday!
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
nwbmac Member 67 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: WA More info | Our little girl turned 5 yesterday! Image hosted by forum (588311) © nwbmac [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Canon T3i | EF 50mm 1.8 II | EF-S 18-135 | EF 300mm f/4L IS | 40mm 2.8 STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 31, 2012 19:49 | #1232 Forgottenalarm wrote in post #14183463
best i can do without blowing out the noise from brightening it.
Focused on photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 31, 2012 21:13 | #1233 nwbmac wrote in post #14186961 Our little girl turned 5 yesterday! Great shot! Those eyes look right through you. "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." -- Anais Nin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/86767382@N00/7022811777/ Getting a drink Focused on photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WetLight Mostly Lurking 13 posts Joined Sep 2011 Location: Boston, MA More info | Apr 01, 2012 08:35 | #1235 Holy squirrel!! Dude did u use the 300 or 500 for this shot? It looks great and u shoul frame it! bluesydude wrote in post #14189959 ![]() Getting a drink
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Quadna71 Senior Member 426 posts Likes: 90 Joined Mar 2012 Location: Delaware More info | Apr 01, 2012 13:12 | #1236 Sometimes I feel like I don't get perfect focus when I leave my lens on autofocus compared to when I take my time using manual focus. When using autofocus, 99% of the time I only have the center point illuminated so I can be critical of where it's picking up. But when I use manual, I'll select Live view, 10x magnification, and then slowly adjust my focus ring. 4 out of 5 times this method yields me a crisper focus. R6 | 50/1.8 | 24-70/2.8 | 24-105/4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MidnightRook Senior Member 676 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Columbus More info | Apr 01, 2012 13:33 | #1237 Unless it is for macro photography, the other points should be accurate. If you reframe afterward then the focal plane would change. Do you have any examples of this focus issue? T3i EF-S 18-55II w/grip ¦ EF 35 2 ¦ EF 50 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
proletsearch Senior Member 795 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2011 Location: Nuernberg/Germany More info | Apr 01, 2012 13:49 | #1238 IMAGE LINK: https://picasaweb.google.com …y0liipFm0?feat=directlink IMAGE LINK: https://picasaweb.google.com …y0liipFm0?feat=directlink Canon EOS 600D gripped, Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mark II - Youtube
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Quadna71 Senior Member 426 posts Likes: 90 Joined Mar 2012 Location: Delaware More info | Apr 01, 2012 15:35 | #1239 MidnightRook wrote in post #14191286 Unless it is for macro photography, the other points should be accurate. If you reframe afterward then the focal plane would change. Do you have any examples of this focus issue? Here are two shots. The first is with autofocus locking dead center on the bird's neck. The second is with me manual focusing while at 10x magnification in live view. While sometimes it isn't this drastic, the results are still representative of what's happening. I think it locked just past the bird's neck instead of dead on it. And this was with a tripod...so I know I didn't just drift a little when pressing my remote halfway. Let me know if you can see the difference okay on Flickr.
AF Manual Focus
MF R6 | 50/1.8 | 24-70/2.8 | 24-105/4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AceandDeuce Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 01, 2012 15:52 | #1240 Quadna71 wrote in post #14191811 Here are two shots. The first is with autofocus locking dead center on the bird's neck. The second is with me manual focusing while at 10x magnification in live view. While sometimes it isn't this drastic, the results are still representative of what's happening. I think it locked just past the bird's neck instead of dead on it. And this was with a tripod...so I know I didn't just drift a little when pressing my remote halfway. Let me know if you can see the difference okay on Flickr. If you open that pic up in DPP, you can click "View" at the top, then AF points and it will show you exactly what was in focus. I just took a few shots today that did the same thing...AF was dead on, until I got home.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MidnightRook Senior Member 676 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Columbus More info | Apr 01, 2012 16:31 | #1241 I can't tell you. It kind of sucks to have paid for an AF camera and it not focus right. What focus mode did you use? T3i EF-S 18-55II w/grip ¦ EF 35 2 ¦ EF 50 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 01, 2012 17:45 | #1242 If you open the photos with any photo editing program and try to draw an X with the diagonals from each corner, you will find out that the center of the photo (and the center of your AF area) is NOT the bird or its neck, but the round stone behind the bird. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Quadna71 Senior Member 426 posts Likes: 90 Joined Mar 2012 Location: Delaware More info | Apr 01, 2012 18:22 | #1243 MakisM1 wrote in post #14192356 If you open the photos with any photo editing program and try to draw an X with the diagonals from each corner, you will find out that the center of the photo (and the center of your AF area) is NOT the bird or its neck, but the round stone behind the bird. Given the the center AF point is larger than the little rectangle you see in the VF, the AF system picked the area in front of the stone (the back of the bird which has more contrast) to AF. ...and that's what you get in the photos... I understand what you're say but the center wasn't the starting point. I focused then recomposed - plus there is a slight crop for the clarity (or lack thereof). R6 | 50/1.8 | 24-70/2.8 | 24-105/4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MidnightRook Senior Member 676 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Columbus More info | Apr 01, 2012 18:47 | #1244 If you focus and recompose the focal plane changes. You have to focus and take the photo without moving. The focal plane is parallel to your sensor, so tilting your camera to recompose will change whatever is on the new focal plane to be in focus. T3i EF-S 18-55II w/grip ¦ EF 35 2 ¦ EF 50 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 01, 2012 21:29 | #1245 WetLight wrote in post #14190273 Holy squirrel!! Dude did u use the 300 or 500 for this shot? It looks great and u shoul frame it! Thanks I'm glad you liked the shot. I really dig the reflection. I used the 500 on this. Love that lens! Focused on photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1164 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||