Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Urban Life & Travel 
Thread started 01 Oct 2005 (Saturday) 06:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Burbank Fire (4 pics)

 
marie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,057 posts
Joined Jul 2002
     
Oct 04, 2005 19:22 as a reply to  @ post 820028 |  #16


:cool:
all the photographs are very good

wondering about the wildlife, along with everything else caught up in the fire
:confused:


regards, Marie
Canon G12, dslr 40D, GIX
Canon lens24-105
Lmm10-22mm,17-40,17-85, 70-300,60mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thomascanty
THREAD ­ STARTER
Bold. Pink.
Gone, but not forgotten.
Avatar
38,071 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Temporarily Retired
     
Oct 04, 2005 20:52 as a reply to  @ post 819951 |  #17

pakololo wrote:
yea i sure do remember that fire, that day i came home, and the sky was lit up like crazy im not sure if it was cause of the fire but i know it had something to do with it .... the smoke maybe ...

Nice sunset shots! I think it's the smoke that makes the sky so red during sunset when the fires are burning. It does make for some great photographic opportunities, doesn't it?

DwightMcCann wrote:
I don't want to steal this thread but here are a couple from a wildfire last year.

Don't worry about hijacking the thread. I don't mind at all. You got some real good ones here. Too bad I work nights. I should have gone to work and up on the roof during the day and gotten some pictures while the helicopters were flying, too.

Here's my all time favorite wildfire picture. Unfortunately, I can't claim credit for it, but I sure wish I could. It was taken by a newspaper photographer during the Curve fire in the Angeles National Forest near Crystal Lake back in 2002.

IMAGE: http://www.ldphotography.net/cdpf/tankerdropT-16.jpg

marie wrote:
wondering about the wildlife, along with everything else caught up in the fire
:confused:

Unfortunately, fires like this are usually pretty devastating to the wildlife. Shortly after the Curve fire in 2002, I took a hike into the burned area (while it was still smoldering with hot spots even). I met up with a couple forest rangers who were also up there surveying the area for a report they had to write. They told me about hundreds of squirrels, chipmunks, foxes, deer, etc. they had found dead. Most die from smoke inhilation.


My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LDPhotography.net (external link) | Weekly Pioneer (external link) | Facebook (external link)
"Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,057 posts
Joined Jul 2002
     
Oct 05, 2005 19:29 as a reply to  @ thomascanty's post |  #18

thanks for that Lonnie :(
it's to be expected I guess

that last is a photo and a half
:shock:

it almost looks like it is two pictures in one
the men are just standing there as if nothing is crashing down right beside them
(in the picture anyway)
:eek:


regards, Marie
Canon G12, dslr 40D, GIX
Canon lens24-105
Lmm10-22mm,17-40,17-85, 70-300,60mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thomascanty
THREAD ­ STARTER
Bold. Pink.
Gone, but not forgotten.
Avatar
38,071 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Temporarily Retired
     
Oct 05, 2005 23:55 as a reply to  @ marie's post |  #19

marie wrote:
the men are just standing there as if nothing is crashing down right beside them

I'm not sure if you really think the plane was crashing, so I wanted to clarify... It's a tanker that was dropping a load of fire retardant on a hot spot next to Angeles Crest Highway, near where it intersects with Highway 38*. The plane didn't crash. After releasing the chemical mix, the pilot banked away from the cliff side and flew away for another run.

* The intersection with Highway 38 is still there, but that highway has been closed from Angeles Crest Highway south to just above Crystal Lake since the 1960's when huge pieces of it washed away down the steep hillsides during a particularly wet and rainy winter. Now, Highway 38 is closed several dozen miles further south because of 1) the Curve Fire when that picture of the plane was taken, and 2) this past, even wetter winter when still more of the deteriorating highway was washed away.


My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LDPhotography.net (external link) | Weekly Pioneer (external link) | Facebook (external link)
"Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,057 posts
Joined Jul 2002
     
Oct 06, 2005 05:15 as a reply to  @ thomascanty's post |  #20

thomascanty wrote:
I'm not sure if you really think the plane was crashing, so I wanted to clarify... It's a tanker that was dropping a load of fire retardant on a hot spot next to Angeles Crest Highway, near where it intersects with Highway 38*. The plane didn't crash. After releasing the chemical mix, the pilot banked away from the cliff side and flew away for another run.

* The intersection with Highway 38 is still there, but that highway has been closed from Angeles Crest Highway south to just above Crystal Lake since the 1960's when huge pieces of it washed away down the steep hillsides during a particularly wet and rainy winter. Now, Highway 38 is closed several dozen miles further south because of 1) the Curve Fire when that picture of the plane was taken, and 2) this past, even wetter winter when still more of the deteriorating highway was washed away.


many thanks for all the information Lonnie

the plane still looks unreal there in the shot , almost 'on top' of the 'calm' people
must be the how the photographer took it
to me it's giving a wrong impression,

why would the people stand so near so much chemical discharge ( or anything like it)
:rolleyes: or even a plane 'crashing'

:shock:
the plane looks massive ,
in the shot just, but in proportion to the people, who look so small
and they are all looking down,
checking out that the stuff is 'hitting' the right spots ,
I guess


:confused:


regards, Marie
Canon G12, dslr 40D, GIX
Canon lens24-105
Lmm10-22mm,17-40,17-85, 70-300,60mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thomascanty
THREAD ­ STARTER
Bold. Pink.
Gone, but not forgotten.
Avatar
38,071 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Temporarily Retired
     
Oct 06, 2005 11:53 as a reply to  @ marie's post |  #21

marie wrote:
the plane still looks unreal there in the shot , almost 'on top' of the 'calm' people
must be the how the photographer took it
to me it's giving a wrong impression,

why would the people stand so near so much chemical discharge ( or anything like it)
:rolleyes: or even a plane 'crashing'

I think it's the angle the picture was taken from that is throwing you here. I don't think the plane was really as close to the cliff and people as it seems from the picture. It's just that it's so big, it seems much closer than it really was. Of course, I wasn't there so I can't say that for sure.

As for how calm they are... That fire burned for over a month. Those guys had probably seen this same scene hundreds of times by the time this picture was taken.


My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LDPhotography.net (external link) | Weekly Pioneer (external link) | Facebook (external link)
"Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,057 posts
Joined Jul 2002
     
Oct 06, 2005 19:43 as a reply to  @ thomascanty's post |  #22

thomascanty wrote:
I think it's the angle the picture was taken from that is throwing you here. I don't think the plane was really as close to the cliff and people as it seems from the picture. It's just that it's so big, it seems much closer than it really was. Of course, I wasn't there so I can't say that for sure.
As for how calm they are... That fire burned for over a month. Those guys had probably seen this same scene hundreds of times by the time this picture was taken.

thanks Lonnie
I understand how the men are used to the fires
I meant they were calm and looking around as though the plane was not there at all , even at a 'near' distance
the photo just seems weird , they all do not seem part of it
(together)
:confused:
must be an optical illusion
and I'm having a bad hair day ....or something

:lol:


regards, Marie
Canon G12, dslr 40D, GIX
Canon lens24-105
Lmm10-22mm,17-40,17-85, 70-300,60mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vcutag
Senior Member
Avatar
408 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
     
Oct 06, 2005 23:24 as a reply to  @ marie's post |  #23

Maybe it was shot with a telephoto lens? Wouldn't that have a kind of compression effect, making the background and foreground objects look closer to each other?


Tom Gehring
Richmond, Virginia
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thomascanty
THREAD ­ STARTER
Bold. Pink.
Gone, but not forgotten.
Avatar
38,071 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Temporarily Retired
     
Oct 07, 2005 00:07 as a reply to  @ vcutag's post |  #24

vcutag wrote:
Maybe it was shot with a telephoto lens? Wouldn't that have a kind of compression effect, making the background and foreground objects look closer to each other?

That could be. I have no idea what kind of equipment the photographer was using, so that's definitely a possibility.


My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LDPhotography.net (external link) | Weekly Pioneer (external link) | Facebook (external link)
"Young at heart. Slightly older in other parts."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mills
Goldmember
Avatar
4,105 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Nov 04, 2005 17:40 as a reply to  @ marie's post |  #25

Great shots! Especially of the water & chemical drops.


Mills
1D Mark II & 5D
50 f1.4 16-35 f2.8L 24-70 f2.8L 70-200 f2.8L IS 580 EX & 550 EX Gitzo Mono & Tri Pods Apple iMac G5 & 17 Inch Powerbook

Box Alarm Images (external link)
http://www.myspace.com​/millz11 (external link) Just to see some fun camera phone stuff.:p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,701 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Burbank Fire (4 pics)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Urban Life & Travel 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1586 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.