Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 Apr 2011 (Monday) 08:27
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "which image is nicest?"
image 1
34
79.1%
Image 2
3
7%
Image 3
6
14%

43 voters, 43 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

See if you can guess

 
mininut
Senior Member
Avatar
470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2008
Location: West Midlands, United Kingdom
     
Apr 04, 2011 08:27 |  #1

3 images below of my wife in no particular order, original, lightroom and photoshop, which is best and can you tell which is which?

1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

2
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

3
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


M.

5DIII | 5DII | 1Ds Mk II | Σ 70-200 f/2.8 EX DG | Σ 85 1.4 | Σ50 1.4 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 Di | Tamron 17-35 Di Lots of lights!
www.thefullframe.co.uk (external link) | TheFullFrame on Facebook | (external link)500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Apr 04, 2011 08:32 |  #2

Original is number 2, LR 1 & PS 3?

1st is best I think, followed by second and then third. Didn't like the skin blurring on the 3rd.


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheLostVertex
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2009
Location: Fl
     
Apr 04, 2011 08:54 |  #3

Second is original. I think first is ps, and third is lr. There is alot of blurring in number three in the skin detail, and the detail is better pserved in number one, so I am thinking clarity/skin smoothing.


Steven R.
Flickr (external link)
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 04, 2011 09:05 |  #4

TheLostVertex wrote in post #12154181 (external link)
Second is original. I think first is ps, and third is lr. There is alot of blurring in number three in the skin detail, and the detail is better pserved in number one, so I am thinking clarity/skin smoothing.

Same here.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aligater
Goldmember
Avatar
1,713 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2006
Location: North Staffordshire.UK
     
Apr 04, 2011 10:00 |  #5

I like number 1, best guess.... 1 lightroom, 2 original, 3 ps.


CarLton.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sleepy ­ Owl
Member
Avatar
63 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Minnesota
     
Apr 04, 2011 10:03 |  #6

Your wife is beautiful! :)


~Laura~
Canon T2i ~ 18-55mm kit, 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lecherro
Senior Member
809 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Garland, Texas (Outside Dallas)
     
Apr 04, 2011 14:26 |  #7

I agree that #2 is the original image. If you did your job right we should not be able to tell the others are a particular program....:)


First step........ Take the lens cap off.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Blurr ­ Cube
...a lucky id-iot that didn't get electrocuted...
Avatar
15,147 posts
Likes: 91
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
     
Apr 04, 2011 16:05 as a reply to  @ lecherro's post |  #8

My untrained eye guess:

1 = LR (I voted as the best)
2 = Original (moles/dark spots present on neck and cheek)
3 = Photoshop (the skin looks smooth/softened)

Just my guess. :)


| Canon EOS Systems |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
orisky
Goldmember
Avatar
1,398 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: the oc
     
Apr 04, 2011 16:21 |  #9

TheLostVertex wrote in post #12154181 (external link)
Second is original. I think first is ps, and third is lr. There is alot of blurring in number three in the skin detail, and the detail is better pserved in number one, so I am thinking clarity/skin smoothing.


this




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IShootThings
I thought I was special.......
Avatar
2,032 posts
Likes: 26
Joined May 2009
Location: North Cali
     
Apr 04, 2011 21:13 |  #10

photoshop
original
lightroom


Canon 5D3, Canon XTI (IR converted), 24-70 f2.8L, 16-35 f4L, 50 1.4, 70-200 f2.8L, 100 2.8 macro, 430 ex & 580 exII speedlights.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike
ugly when I'm sober
Avatar
15,398 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 393
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Canterbury/Ramsgate, UK
     
Apr 05, 2011 02:04 |  #11

So, are we going to be graced with an answer?! ;)


www.mikegreenphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)
Gear
UK South Easterners
flickr (external link) Insta1 (external link) Insta2 (external link)

A closed mouth gathers no foot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mininut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2008
Location: West Midlands, United Kingdom
     
Apr 05, 2011 02:38 as a reply to  @ Mike's post |  #12

Sleepy Owl wrote in post #12154529 (external link)
Your wife is beautiful! :)

Thanks :grin:

lecherro wrote in post #12156302 (external link)
If you did your job right we should not be able to tell the others are a particular program....:)

And very right you are too :D

You're all right in that 2 is the original...

Looks like my photoshop skills need improving! lol, stick to LR me thinks :grin:

1 is LR
3 is PS

I don't really dig the smoothing myself, are there other methods I could try where I don't lose skin detail in photoshop?

Thanks for you feedback guys.

M.


5DIII | 5DII | 1Ds Mk II | Σ 70-200 f/2.8 EX DG | Σ 85 1.4 | Σ50 1.4 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 Di | Tamron 17-35 Di Lots of lights!
www.thefullframe.co.uk (external link) | TheFullFrame on Facebook | (external link)500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Apr 05, 2011 05:40 |  #13

Sure: http://abduzeedo.com/p​erfect-lie-photoshop-2 (external link)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Apr 05, 2011 08:37 |  #14

The fact that her left eye is out of focus is very distracting, considering the amount of detail and color in her irises. I'm guessing you were going for a shallow DoF, but across the face DoF falloff is not working for me. Instead of focusing on the left cheek, maybe try focusing on the bridge of the nose if you still want that shallow of DoF. Also - the umbrella reflection takes out the entire pupil with the model facing directly into the umbrella. Maybe try some variations with the model facing more toward or away from the camera with the same set-up, to manipulate the light modeling and placement of the umbrella catchlight. Processing-wise 1 is more natural than 3.

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Blurr ­ Cube
...a lucky id-iot that didn't get electrocuted...
Avatar
15,147 posts
Likes: 91
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
     
Apr 05, 2011 11:50 as a reply to  @ kirkt's post |  #15

Yay! Winner, winner, chicken dinner... lucky guesser. Heh.

1 and 3 are real close. PS skin softening is overdone on magazine covers and prints, but that's normal I guess. I like how 1 is "not too much" you know, so that's why I thought it was LR.

Now that it's been mentioned... the portrait would be much better if BOTH eyes were sharp and in focus. Time to schedule a re-shoot. ;)


| Canon EOS Systems |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,271 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
See if you can guess
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1728 guests, 151 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.