I dont know what you've done with the 7D files but that does not represent what I've seen with a decent lens from my 7D.
Regardless of that the x100 looks good, even if its processed (NR & sharpened).
RobDickinson Goldmember More info | Apr 07, 2011 19:11 | #31 I dont know what you've done with the 7D files but that does not represent what I've seen with a decent lens from my 7D. www.HeroWorkshops.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrLA Senior Member 727 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2007 More info | Apr 07, 2011 20:49 | #32 i want fuji x1000. amazon has it for $4k! Body: Canon 5Dc, (Coming soon <<<6Dc, maybe I shall wait for 6Diic with TouchScreen!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 07, 2011 21:19 | #33 MrLA wrote in post #12179982 i want fuji x1000. amazon has it for $4k! Yeah. I saw that. That's quite ridiculous! Paid 1200 for mine and 84.50 for the hood and adapter ring. All of the online stores are taking advantage of the whole Japan crisis situation. Prices here in Canada have not shifted. (at least the Canadian CPS prices hasn't). I'm MARLON
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 07, 2011 21:25 | #34 RobDickinson wrote in post #12179373 I dont know what you've done with the 7D files but that does not represent what I've seen with a decent lens from my 7D. Regardless of that the x100 looks good, even if its processed (NR & sharpened). The files were not post processed. They are Camera jpeg outputs SOOC. strobe monkey wrote in post #12179234 you need to upsize the x100 and 7d image to match the 5d2 or, downsize the 5d2 and 7d image to match the x100. Daship wrote in post #12179049 The Fugi has more contrast to meter off of, make it the same or flush it down the toilet. Obviously trying to give fugi some edge here. Fan boy!!!!! gabebalazs wrote in post #12177695 interesting comparison, thanks. Still, looking forward to seeing same output size (upsizing or downsizing) images. Also, the x100 image pretty much looks like it was run through a similar workflow of NR that I use for my 7D images. Remove noise first then sharpen the edges while leaving the uniform areas "soft". sharrowm wrote in post #12176925 Hmm...well, maybe I'm thinking about this wrong, but it seems to me that the only thing that counts in the end is the final image (regardless of the number of pixels), and you are in effect, comparing different images (crops). I would love to see the 3 images side by side with the identical FOV. As for the rest of the forum members, I have decided to downsize the files to satisfy everyones needs. (even though, this is not how it's normally done - not even dp review does it this way - they just provide crops at the pixel level thus called the HIGH ISO/NOISE test samples). I'm MARLON
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrLA Senior Member 727 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2007 More info | Apr 07, 2011 22:51 | #35 Marloon, how does the x100 in low light compare to 5Dii with L prime lens? Body: Canon 5Dc, (Coming soon <<<6Dc, maybe I shall wait for 6Diic with TouchScreen!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sbattey Goldmember 1,250 posts Joined Mar 2011 More info | Apr 07, 2011 23:37 | #36 Permanent banThe images are too compressed, you can't judge noise when there are jpeg artifacts. This is still a no go, you need to upload CLEAN images. Canon 7D | Canon 50mm f/1.4 | 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2011 01:15 | #37 MrLA wrote in post #12180783 Marloon, how does the x100 in low light compare to 5Dii with L prime lens? pics side by side would be great! How does the X100 in low light compare to the 5Dii? Well the 5Dii is definitely more enjoyable to use in Low light due to it's bigger buffer (preventing the camera from freezing up it's settings like on the X100), ability to manually focus (MF is IMPOSSIBLE on the X100), and ability to offer phase detect AF as oppose to contrast based AF on the X100 (however, the X100 is still no slouch). sbattey wrote in post #12181030 The images are too compressed, you can't judge noise when there are jpeg artifacts. This is still a no go, you need to upload CLEAN images. how would you like me to process/post them to prevent compression. They were compressed when they came out of the camera then cropped and compiled in CS5. They were the exported and uploaded. I'm MARLON
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrLA Senior Member 727 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2007 More info | Apr 08, 2011 13:32 | #38 marloon, i really appreciate your given descriptive of the x100. i'm eagerly waiting for your low-light comparison of the x100 vs 5Dii w/ L prime lens. And good luck on your finals. Body: Canon 5Dc, (Coming soon <<<6Dc, maybe I shall wait for 6Diic with TouchScreen!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2011 14:30 | #39 Oh, so this is where the current thread is... I just replied to the old one... SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jacobsen1 Cream of the Crop 9,629 posts Likes: 32 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Mt View, RI More info | Apr 08, 2011 14:40 | #40 thanks for the images. My Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2011 14:49 | #41 jacobsen1 wrote in post #12184518 thanks for the images. how come your links to your sites are all stared out in your sig though? GREAT point! I WILL fix that right away. I used *******... going to have to fix that. thanks for telling me! I'm MARLON
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2011 21:26 | #42 MrLA wrote in post #12184156 marloon, i really appreciate your given descriptive of the x100. i'm eagerly waiting for your low-light comparison of the x100 vs 5Dii w/ L prime lens. And good luck on your finals. oh, i've just placed an order for the x100 with Crutchfield, $1200. an impulse buyer i am ![]()
I'm MARLON
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MrLA Senior Member 727 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2007 More info | Apr 08, 2011 22:02 | #43 i should have said on pre-order list Body: Canon 5Dc, (Coming soon <<<6Dc, maybe I shall wait for 6Diic with TouchScreen!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2011 23:16 | #44 MrLA wrote in post #12186822 i should have said on pre-order list Crutchfield doesn't know when they will get a batch yet. oh, marloon, you shoot in a controlled environment for comparison. just dim the light in your room. The lights are actually really dim in my room. Normally, I am shooting at iso 1250 at f1.4 in my room and only get 1/60 SS. I'm MARLON
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mojosh Hatchling 8 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | Apr 10, 2011 14:34 | #45 confused* isit possible that it can outbeat 5D mkII?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1496 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||