Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 Apr 2011 (Thursday) 18:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Washed out photos

 
darence
Member
43 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Nis
     
Apr 08, 2011 09:46 |  #16

Which lens do you use ,and do you have some filters or hood attached on lens?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Apr 08, 2011 11:33 |  #17

tonylong wrote in post #12179491 (external link)
Brewster, are you shooting jpegs or Raw?

If jpegs, try playing with your Picture Styles. If you, say, set it to the Landscape PS it gives the images more "pop".

20D, no Picture Styles.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shockey
Goldmember
1,187 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Boise Idaho
     
Apr 08, 2011 11:37 |  #18

Levels adjustment, get the whites white and the blacks black. Most digital photos need that.
You can do that with jpegs or raw. If you are doing no processing just sooc, try decreasing your exposure and increasing your contrast, see if that helps.


___________
Boise Portrait Photographer
www.alloutdoor.smugmug​.com (external link)
www.aoboudoirboise.smu​gmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Apr 08, 2011 13:01 |  #19

As was mentioned, the problem was light and user, not the camera. :)

In the few I looked at, you're shooting in Av, which means the camera needs to calculate exposure based on it's metering.. and it's doing that in scenes with (what looks like) overcast light and a lot highlights and shadows.. you're also using pattern metering, which is fine, just understand how that impacts your exposure.

If you're shooting in RAW these should be easily recoverable. Moving forward try using manual mode so that you are controlling exposure, not the camera's metering.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Apr 08, 2011 15:05 |  #20

tzalman wrote in post #12183495 (external link)
20D, no Picture Styles.

Ah, good call, I missed that!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Apr 08, 2011 15:10 |  #21

Here are two older shots taken with my 20D, both in similar lighting conditions... obviously post processed, but they were not nearly as washed out as yours straight out of camera. It's not the camera, or a dirty sensor. Start shooting in manual so that you're not relying on the camera to calculate your exposure. It's always going to try and establish the middle ground to save highlights and shadows, which is going to result in low contrast in situations like your example.

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4102/4890663145_1ce99264cb.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/tycn/4890663145​/  (external link)
Small Waterfall (external link) by Βrandon (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4077/4894599691_ffc2e4034e.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/tycn/4894599691​/  (external link)
Southern Palms Beach (external link) by Βrandon (external link), on Flickr

[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ONE30
I don't have a point!!!
Avatar
4,284 posts
Likes: 1560
Joined Mar 2011
Location: newYORK
     
Apr 08, 2011 15:24 |  #22

BrandonSi wrote in post #12183993 (external link)
the problem was light and user, not the camera. :)

THANKS:) your comment made me laugh, I remembered my college professor telling us in class that the computer is only as smart as the user!

enjoy
m




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damian75
Goldmember
Avatar
1,623 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2006
Location: PA
     
Apr 08, 2011 16:46 |  #23

2 things to start with first clean the sensor or send it in for cleaning second I would invest in a polarizing filter if you are going to be shooting a lot outside.


Canon EOS 40D,30D, Canon 70-200 2.8L, 24-70 2.8L, 85 1.8, Canon extension tube, Elinchrom Lighting gear, 
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmwag
Brown Noser has crush on Suzyview
Avatar
2,641 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City
     
Apr 08, 2011 16:54 |  #24

BrandonSi wrote in post #12183993 (external link)
As was mentioned, the problem was light and user, not the camera. :)

In the few I looked at, you're shooting in Av, which means the camera needs to calculate exposure based on it's metering.. and it's doing that in scenes with (what looks like) overcast light and a lot highlights and shadows.. you're also using pattern metering, which is fine, just understand how that impacts your exposure.

If you're shooting in RAW these should be easily recoverable

I think that pretty much nails it. I recently shot a series in similar light with the same results. Shooting RAW saved the day




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IShootThings
I thought I was special.......
Avatar
2,032 posts
Likes: 26
Joined May 2009
Location: North Cali
     
Apr 08, 2011 18:45 |  #25

light has been mentioned already but i'll also say the these pictures look like they have typical sf bay area haze.


Canon 5D3, Canon XTI (IR converted), 24-70 f2.8L, 16-35 f4L, 50 1.4, 70-200 f2.8L, 100 2.8 macro, 430 ex & 580 exII speedlights.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jimmer411
Thank god Im green.
866 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Pacific, WA
     
Apr 09, 2011 20:19 |  #26

Have you tried increasing saturation and manually adjusting the white balance slider a hair warmer? Vibrancy in LR3 works wonders as well, Im not sure what the equivilent is in Aperature tho.


5D3 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 24-70 f/2.8L II | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 430EX | YN-568EX II | YN-622c | YN-622-TX |
Selling Sigma 30mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bedojo
Goldmember
1,301 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: portland oregon
     
Apr 10, 2011 01:06 |  #27

like everyone is saying shoot raw, clean sensor
i know my images aren't great. but
i went from this

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

to better
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4108/5604333140_7fcf187b36.jpg

i brought exposure +1.7, blacks + 70, brightness to 0, contrast to 0, and curves for contrast
and other stuff, but that got rid of some the washed out

follow me 500px (external link) || Facebook Page (external link) || Flickr (external link) || Website & Blog (external link) ||Feedback: 1 2
Gear: Fujifilm X-Pro 1 || 18mm f2.0 || 35mm f1.4 || 60mm f2.4 || AB800 || YN560 || Gordy Wrist Strap || Billingham Hadley Pro ||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sbattey
Goldmember
1,250 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
Apr 10, 2011 01:07 |  #28
bannedPermanent ban

Looks like you sneezed on the sensor.


Canon 7D | Canon 50mm f/1.4 | 430EX II
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Apr 10, 2011 01:14 |  #29

Heh! Some people would prefer the "style" of the first one!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bedojo
Goldmember
1,301 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: portland oregon
     
Apr 10, 2011 01:15 |  #30

sbattey wrote in post #12192746 (external link)
Looks like you sneezed on the sensor.

lol! :P

@op: you dont have image editing on so i can post it but i took the one with the guy standing on the sand uped the exposure by 1.40, blacks did 15, fill light just a tad because couldnt get blacks where i wanted them and a slight s curve, clarity and tad bit of vibrance and turned into a photo i wouldnt be ashamed of puting on fbook
you dont really need to shoot raw, that jpeg was perfectly salvageable. but raw is awesome :P

@ tony yeah i was going for the washed out lens flare, but then i started pp'ing it and liked it a bit more
i dont like the super washed out look

he could apply picture styles in one of the canon programs right? i hardly use them so i donno


follow me 500px (external link) || Facebook Page (external link) || Flickr (external link) || Website & Blog (external link) ||Feedback: 1 2
Gear: Fujifilm X-Pro 1 || 18mm f2.0 || 35mm f1.4 || 60mm f2.4 || AB800 || YN560 || Gordy Wrist Strap || Billingham Hadley Pro ||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,404 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Washed out photos
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2737 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.