DianeK wrote in post #12207319
I have finished reading Kelby's book and am embarrassed to admit that I'm really struggling with the basic question of "what happens to my original raw file?" concept. Since I have just starting learning post-processing, it is a given that 6 months down the road I will know more and will want to revisit favorite photos to improve on what I do to them today. So, based on that assumption, here are my questions:
Question 1: When I import an image into a Lightroom catalogue, is it importing a copy of my original raw or actually importing the original?
If you look at the options for importing, you will see you have choices. Please read the Lightroom Help in chapter 4 on Importing photos -- it will go through the various choices! You can simply Import a folder of photos while keeping them in their present place in your hard drive, and that is often a good thing to do if you are happy with their place and how they are named and such. Or, you can copy them into a new destination with a new name and such (this is the default if you are importing from a camera card). Or, you can move them from one place to another and rename them or not, it's all up to you.
In the end, you only need one copy of your Raw file, though -- the one that Lightroom has located and imported and such. So, for example, if you Imported by copying a shoot from a camera card, then when you are done you can reformat the card. If you wanted to use Lightroom to Import an old folder with photos that you wanted to relocate and rename for a better "organization", then when you saw things looked right, you could go to your system browser and delete that old folder because Lightroom now has the images in the new spot.
Of course, though I said you only need the one copy that is in the LR library, that's only half right because you also want a backup system in place where all your images (as well as the Lightroom catalog folder) are being consistently backed up to a separate hard drive.
Importing goes beyond just the physical moving or copying or renaming, of course, it "catalogs" the images and folders and begins creating metadata for each file containing all your organization and editing data for them. That's really important to absorb!
Question 2 (really a scenario): Let's say I work on a photo and am happy with my results today and want to do more that one thing with it, i.e. (a) send a jpeg in an email for a friend to view, (b) put a higher resolution jpeg or a tiff into a slide show to be viewed on my computer or an HDTV (c) save a copy that has the metadata embedded to send off for printing, (d) save the original raw with no metadata in case I want to start all over again in a few months when I know more about what I am doing. Is the answer for this to create virtual copies right from the get-go? Is the answer to (d) to keep the metadata in an xmp file and just hit reset when I re-open in Lightroom down the road?
Virtual copies is very useful for working on different versions, sure. Where you don't need to waste your energies on, though, is if you are just exporting things for different print resolutions, because the Raw file doesn't "care" about the print resolution. You may want to export to specific folders if you are doing a batch for, say, 4x6 photos and another for, say, 20x30 prints -- how you set such things up is all up to you. But at the level of your Raw processing, well, it don't care, unless you decide to re-import say a tiff that was exported for a certain use. Then that goes beyond the Raw.
I don't know why this basic concept is so confusing to me but it just is. I'm so paranoid about losing my original image at this point.
Diane
The whole thing to "get" here with a Raw workflow is that you can't lose your original image because, by nature, Raw processors do not change the Raw data. Unless you delete the Raw file, it will always have the original data that you can work with. That's one of the cool, "magical" things about Raw processing!