Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
Thread started 12 Apr 2011 (Tuesday) 21:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Family at the beach

 
fab123
Member
Avatar
104 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas
     
Apr 12, 2011 21:52 |  #1

Here goes my 2nd post ever on the forums (My first one was today under the sports section) I am completely new to PP and hooked on the bleach bypass filters/presets... Here are some pics from a family session with my wife and daughters (I'm the monkey wearing glasses in the second shot) All critiques and comments are greatly welcomed as I would like to make improvements!

IMAGE: http://i1031.photobucket.com/albums/y371/fceleita123/IMG_3193web-version.jpg

IMAGE: http://i1031.photobucket.com/albums/y371/fceleita123/IMG_3171web-version.jpg

Fabio (NOT the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter guy)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LizzieJ
Member
Avatar
214 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Florida
     
Apr 13, 2011 05:56 |  #2

Welcome! You have a very beautiful family. I really like the clothing choices. These seem a bit under-exposed, but maybe it's the choice of PP. Keep shooting, I'd love to see more.

~Megan


www.meganjohnsphotogra​phy.com (external link)
Stuff I have: 5DII | 24-70 f/2.8L | 50 f/1.8 | 85 1.8 | 430ex & 580ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JGelks2007
Senior Member
341 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Apr 13, 2011 12:45 |  #3

Nice shots I like them.


7D, 430EX II, EF-S 17-55mm F2.8 IS, EF 70-200mm F4L, Canon Powershot SD940 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nick821117
Senior Member
Avatar
595 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 80
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Zhangzhou Fujian China
     
Apr 14, 2011 04:46 |  #4

I like it ! ~~~ ^_^


Canon EOS 50D,Tamron 17-50 f2.8(A16),Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5 USM,Industar 50mm F3.5,Helios 44M-4 58mm F2.
WeChat:ycs201805,E-mail: nick821117@163.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
A.Salinas86
Member
Avatar
86 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Texas
     
Apr 14, 2011 09:03 |  #5

Nice pics...what kind of set up did you use?


Canon T1i | EFS 18-55mm | EF 85mm f/1.8 | EF 75-300mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
Avatar
2,192 posts
Gallery: 109 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 449
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area
     
Apr 14, 2011 09:21 |  #6

Doesn't anyone see thats it's over processed? too contrasty -- if it was film, I'd say it was underexposed and over developed.


multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
Leicas, Canons, Hasselblads
all and historic dingus

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
suecassidy
Goldmember
Avatar
4,102 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
Location: Huntington Beach California
     
Apr 14, 2011 09:29 |  #7

a pet peeve of mine is when people duck down in a photo to "fit in" or to get their heads closer to the other heads. I understand the INTENT, I just think it looks weird to me. In this particular situation, you are shooting your own portraits and probably never even thought about it, you just knew you didn't want to cut off the top of your head, and your wife followed your lead. Next time, I would chose a pose that naturally put your heads closer together if that was the look you were going for. OR, I'd shoot the adults fully upright, check the result and move the camera/tripod back if my head were cut off. It just isn't natural to have your butts stuck out like that. Having said that, you have a beautiful family and when your little girls are all grown up, you will be glad that you made the effort to photograph you all together!


Sue Cassidy
GEAR: Canon 1ds, Canon 1d Mark iii, Sony RX 100, Canon 50mmL 1.2, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, Canon 100-400L IS, Canon 14mm L, 2.8, . Lighting: Elinchrom Rangers, D-lite 400s, Canon 580/550 flashes. 74 ' Octabank, 27' Rotalux. Editing: Aperture 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fab123
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
104 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas
     
Apr 14, 2011 13:29 |  #8

The clothing for the pictures was picked by my wife, she seems to be spot on for these type of things. As far as the actual photographs I am a complete noob trying to improve. Thanks for the tips on the poses and it is something that I'll definitely keep in mind for a future session with my girls.
On the over processed comment, would you mind giving me some pointers on how to not to over do it. I used Lightroom 3 which I am completely new to....
Thank you everyone for your kind comments!


Fabio (NOT the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter guy)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fab123
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
104 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas
     
Apr 14, 2011 21:02 |  #9

Here are a couple of more from that same day, processed a bit lighter (please give me feedback on how to do better PP as I am a complete noob)

IMAGE: http://i1031.photobucket.com/albums/y371/fceleita123/IMG_3068web-version.jpg

IMAGE: http://i1031.photobucket.com/albums/y371/fceleita123/IMG_3074web-version.jpg

Fabio (NOT the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter guy)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fab123
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
104 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas
     
Apr 14, 2011 21:04 |  #10

A.Salinas86 wrote in post #12220036 (external link)
Nice pics...what kind of set up did you use?

These were taken with my T2i and the EF-S10-22mm lens.... Should have used a flash perhaps too but I am still a bit new to photography.


Fabio (NOT the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter guy)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fab123
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
104 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas
     
Apr 14, 2011 21:05 |  #11

suecassidy wrote in post #12220192 (external link)
a pet peeve of mine is when people duck down in a photo to "fit in" or to get their heads closer to the other heads. I understand the INTENT, I just think it looks weird to me. In this particular situation, you are shooting your own portraits and probably never even thought about it, you just knew you didn't want to cut off the top of your head, and your wife followed your lead. Next time, I would chose a pose that naturally put your heads closer together if that was the look you were going for. OR, I'd shoot the adults fully upright, check the result and move the camera/tripod back if my head were cut off. It just isn't natural to have your butts stuck out like that. Having said that, you have a beautiful family and when your little girls are all grown up, you will be glad that you made the effort to photograph you all together!


Sue, thank you very much for your input..... Were you able to distinguish the Huntington Beach pier in the background? (I noticed HB is listed on your profile)


Fabio (NOT the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter guy)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mcluckie
I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once!
Avatar
2,192 posts
Gallery: 109 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 449
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area
     
Apr 15, 2011 09:47 |  #12

The last one is better. In Lightroom, I think the best instruction I can give is to go from top to bottom in the Develop palette. Start with exposure fix and work your way down.

Most blacks should have some detail, like hair. Also whites, except specular highlights. In Photoshop levels, for commercial print work, in Levels (histogram work), I always defined my cmyk black point as 0,0,0,95% black; white point as 5%,0,0,0. Then I'd pick the area in the image that I wanted black WITH detail, and then using the white picker to choose the area I wanted white with detail. That, and 20 years of darkroom work, taught me how an image should look. In your first image with the guy leaning dow, that black point might be some in the black mess of the womans and kids hair -- now a blob (a little trial and re-try works to find it), and the white point might be the littlest girls smooth area of her dress.

I just noticed a weird edge to the guys shirt at the sky. You got some mask going on here?

Unless you wanted a blind "OOH OOH, what great photos" and "how did you get these amazing images?


multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
Leicas, Canons, Hasselblads
all and historic dingus

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaycphotography
Member
54 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2011
     
Apr 15, 2011 15:18 |  #13

Like others have said...the blacks seem really heavy in these images. Either they were underexposed in the camera, or had too much contrast added during PP.

Presets and filters are great once you know how to edit. If you don't understand what the presets are doing or how to manipulate them to get the end result you want...they often times will do more harm than good. No preset works perfectly for every image you take, you have to know how to tweak them to get the result you want.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fab123
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
104 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas
     
Apr 15, 2011 15:42 |  #14

Thank you for the honest feedback, it is much appreciated!
Can you guys point me to some good online tutorials for Lightroom?


Fabio (NOT the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter guy)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Apr 15, 2011 16:32 |  #15

mcluckie wrote in post #12220139 (external link)
Doesn't anyone see thats it's over processed? too contrasty -- if it was film, I'd say it was underexposed and over developed.

Agree. Too much contrast added.. especially at the shadow end. Their hair and eyes are very dark. My guess would be a non-calibrated computer screen which when developing photos is like shooting in the dark or developing "blind". But you can monitor the histogram, if you know what that is, to make sure you don't over do contrast.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,874 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Family at the beach
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Kids & Family 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is vinceisvisual
1111 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.