Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 12 Apr 2011 (Tuesday) 22:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Frustrated with 17-55 and Canon service

 
DL ­ Photo
Senior Member
577 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
     
Apr 13, 2011 15:39 |  #16

Here is the linkt to the "lensrentals" article. Guess you can make your own decision based on this. I have also seen other articles (when Google'd) that also recommend against using the 17-55 with the 20D......however none really say why.

http://www.lensrentals​.com …anon-ef-s-17-55mm-f2.8-is (external link)


G16
OMD-10 (absolutely love this little devil)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
District_History_Fan
Goldmember
2,286 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
     
Apr 13, 2011 16:48 as a reply to  @ DL Photo's post |  #17

Sorry to hear of your problem with the 17-55IS. Mine is a smidge off too. It took +5MA on the 50D and is perfect now, even wide open. It took me about two minutes to achieve amazing sharpness. To bad the 20D doesn't have the capability to do a quick micro focus adjustment. :( You could always send Canon the lens and camera and tell them to make it work.


www.ericmcferrin.smugm​ug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrFahrenheit
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Apr 13, 2011 16:53 |  #18

I talked to canon again and asked of I should send the body in with the lens. They said that it wouldn't hurt, so I'll be sending in both after easter as I need the body until then. Thank you everyone for the information. I'll post an update after I get it back in a few weeks


Gear: 20D, 17-55, Nifty Fifty, 430ex, 2 * YN-560, AB400

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3076
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Apr 13, 2011 17:33 |  #19

MrFahrenheit wrote in post #12216141 (external link)
I talked to canon again and asked of I should send the body in with the lens. They said that it wouldn't hurt, so I'll be sending in both after easter as I need the body until then. Thank you everyone for the information. I'll post an update after I get it back in a few weeks

if it doesnt come back perfect id start crawling up the chain of command a bit..But be nice..

And start considering a body upgrade, As focus microadjust woulda saved you a lot of money and headaches here


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Apr 13, 2011 17:43 |  #20

Yup; camera back with the lens is likely the only way they'd be able to recreate the problem. The LensRentals.com folks had a great post about this situation that was linked a little while back.

These sorts of issues are not, generally, entirely the fault of the lens; so if the factory determines that the lens, or body, individually is within spec it can still be your particular combination of hardware. And, therefore, they need to see both items together.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,051 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Frustrated with 17-55 and Canon service
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2921 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.