Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 13 Apr 2011 (Wednesday) 00:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Quick Review of the Photoclam Pro Gold II Easy QR + Photoclam PT224

 
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 13, 2011 00:23 |  #1

I posted on here when I was looking to upgrade from my Dolica CF tripod and ballhead to something a bit more high end. I was pointed to Kerry from Reallybigcameras and also to the Benro C-2680T. Wanting to save some money, I found the Benro C-2680T on ebay from sub $300 and jumped at the deal. However, when I received it I was a little disappointed at its small height. It was about equal to my Dolica height wise. On the bright side the twist locks were fantastic and it folded up VERY small (17").

However, as all things in photography go, that little height detail bothered me. So I started looking into competitive offerings from other companies. Pretty soon I arrived at the Photoclam PT224 CF tripod. No reviews had really been done of it yet except for a random video circulating the net showing a asian man dangling from the tripod to show its load bearing capacity. From the stats posted online, he height looked perfect, adding about 4-5" onto my Benro's height while only increasing the folded length a little under 2". As you can see in the image below this put my 7D just about at perfect eye height for me (right around 5'10"-5'11"). Note that one of the tables created to compare the Photoclam Tripod line inaccurately puts the folded height of this tripod right around 15.6". The correct folded height is 18.9" which is much more realistic for a 4 section tripod of this height.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5303/5615522334_937f95ae00_b.jpg
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5308/5614942617_41082aa210_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5150/5615521790_08cb9595ff_b.jpg
I received the tripod and was impressed that it came with a nice bag, nicer than the Benro, in fact, as the tripod fits in the bag much more comfortably. The Benro tripod is only easy to get in the bag in one direction and even then its a bit tight. The Photoclam bag fits the tripod and ballhead without issue with a little room to spare.

The tripod is well made. The CF tubes are a bit tighter fit than the Benro making extending the lens take a little more effort. The Benro legs can almost be pulled down by gravity when loosened a quarter turn. The Photoclam have to be pulled. Take that as a pro or con depending on if you feel this means a more rigid final product or not. Both the Benro and Photoclam CF seems to be of equal thickness and both feature the largest leg diameter of 28mm. All the legs on the Photoclam do not rotate, the Benro does not rotate except for the last tube. Both have center columns that do not rotate.

The feet are standard rubber. The rubber feet can be removed to expose some nice chrome spikes underneath. The rubber is fairly hard to remove as it is very tight.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5303/5614942749_f62a788631_b.jpg

Some of you might have seen my post about a slight manufacturing defect in the twist locks. One twist lock was put on a bit crooked resulting in the leg splaying out of line a bit when extended. I assume this is a rare defect and Kerry is currently working on getting me a replacement tube to fix this issue.

The tripod comes with a ground level set that allows you to remove the center column either for weight savings or to get the tripod very low to the ground. I have not tried to use this feature but it has previously been reviewed in another members PT124 review. The tripod also has a spring loaded weight hook which retracts into the tripod body when not in use.

The angle locks on the legs are self-locking. What I mean by that is they automatically snap to the next higher angle when unfolding the tripod. This makes setup a bit quicker as you don't have to pull out three stoppers and then push them back in. The Benro and my old Dolica both use the latter system.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5064/5614940713_25b8e49a98_b.jpg

Finally we have the ballhead. Photoclam is probably best known on these boards for their ballheads. I haven't seen much in the way of reviews on the Pro Gold II line. I haven't used competing products so take my review for what it is. The ballhead comes in a nice case that has a very nice suede pouch for storage if you should choose to use it. From what I have seen its similar to the RRS bag and isn't merely meant to keep the ballhead scratch free in shipping.

The ballhead itself is a nice black matte finish. There is nice easy-to-grip surface on both the panning screw and the locking screw. The panning base also has some knurling allowing a better grip for tightening. The ballhead is accented with a bit of gold bling to let you know you spent a boatload of money.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5187/5614940497_1d33e3052e_b.jpg

The locking knob has a minimum friction setting inset into the knob. Its definitely nice to have this feature. My Dolica ballhead had this but it was its own knob and was always loosening on its own. The photoclam is designed to be hard to turn so it stays exactly where you set it.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5184/5615520928_c1b52aa26f_b.jpg

Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 13, 2011 00:26 |  #2

The QR I got with my ballhead is the lever version. The ballhead can also be bought with a screw QR or a built in panning base. For folded length reasons I decided not to splurge on the panning base QR variety. The QR plate has inset levels allowing some degree of accuracy when you need to make sure that your camera is set perfectly level. A bubble level is also featured on top of the plate to allow a more than a single axis of precision.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5223/5615521958_d50bffe6b7_b.jpg
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5107/5614941145_b714d5f23f_b.jpg

The lever opens halfway by default allowing you to slide in the camera plate from the side and have the reassurance of the safety stop. If you pull back on the small pin in the lever it allows you to completely open the clamp to set or remove the camera vertically. The QR by default was sized to fit the RRS 7D plate I bought without adjustment. However, if adjustment is needed, photoclam included a adjustment screw keychain that allows the clamp to be opened or closed to fit differing plate sizes. As an added random bonus, the keychain has a bubble level on it as well.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5061/5615521314_d18aa86bc8_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5110/5615521582_c2647d1a3a_b.jpg

You can see my setup in my signature. Admittedly, its not a very challenging setup for this ballhead. However, I am happy to report that I have not experienced any droop when this guy locks down. It locks the ball VERY tight. The operation of the ballhead is silky smooth and the ballhead panning base is smooth as well with nice inscribed angle values.

Both the Photoclam and Benro tripod legs are great investments. I wish I had bought the Photoclam first sure. The height factor is so nice and I didn't know what I was missing until I tried it. The Photoclam still is about 6" shorter folded up than my Dolica so folded length doesn't suffer that greatly. Both the Benro and Photoclam appear to be built very solidly and inspire confidence. Except for the difference in height, the Photoclam is a bit more polished with the included ground level set, lower minimum height, all legs anti-rotation and self-locking angle stops.

The ballhead is much nicer to use than the old Dolica. It has much smoother movement, locks down MUCH tighter, doesn't have any droop with the lenses in my signature, and I love the operation of the photoclam lever clamp. The Pro Gold ballhead allows the Photoclam tripod to fold up perfectly. On the Benro the feet splay outward ever so slightly due to interference with the largest diameter twist lock.

I wouldn't hesitate to recommend either tripod or the photoclam ballhead to anyone looking for a nice setup. Feel free to ask me any questions or to provide any additional pictures. Sorry I can't provide a better comparison to other high end products.

Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ekimzulad
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Apr 2011
     
Apr 13, 2011 14:41 |  #3

Nice review. When did you order the Photo Clam Pro Gold II? I've been trying to contact them for a couple weeks now and have been unsuccessful.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Apr 13, 2011 15:01 |  #4

ekimzulad wrote in post #12215377 (external link)
Nice review. When did you order the Photo Clam Pro Gold II? I've been trying to contact them for a couple weeks now and have been unsuccessful.

I ordered the pro gold II from Kerry 4 weeks ago. The PT224 was ordered from him about 2 weeks ago.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rchr
Member
38 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Apr 18, 2011 20:55 |  #5

How did you manage to pull the rubber spikes? I tried pulling it but it's so hard!
If you screw it off, it just pops the whole thing out.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Oct 11, 2011 22:24 |  #6

rchr wrote in post #12249110 (external link)
How did you manage to pull the rubber spikes? I tried pulling it but it's so hard!
If you screw it off, it just pops the whole thing out.

I'm really late on this one but for other people's sake it is REALLY hard. Probably my biggest complaint about the tripod. Just twist in the opposite direction that the feet screw in and kinda rock it back and forth. It'll pop off eventually.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Oct 11, 2011 22:28 |  #7

Let me also follow up that Kerry from ReallyBigCameras did send out a replacement leg eventually. The process took a while but apparently this is because of all the marketing tours photoclam was on. Regardless, the new leg works grear(I replaced it myself. The leg that was defective had the leg warmer on it and the one sent did not so I am without that...although with a CF tripod I don't think I really care unless someone can tell me why I should. I kept the old leg just in case...shame I can't convert it to a monopod ;).


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhett78
Member
36 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Jackson, MI
     
Mar 01, 2012 17:59 as a reply to  @ Sdiver2489's post |  #8

How has this tripod treated you now since you have had it longer? I am thinking about going with the PT324 and either a pro gold ballhead or a pc-40ns. I am 6'3 and thinking the thicker legs and taller height of the 324 would be better for the future.

I am debating on the PT324 or the feisol 3442......


7dmkii, 50D, XSI (dead), EOS 1V-HS, EOS 3, 70-200L 2.8 non-is, Sigma 17-50 2.8, canon 85 1.8, 18-55 kit lens, yongnuo 685 550ex.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,793 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Quick Review of the Photoclam Pro Gold II Easy QR + Photoclam PT224
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1045 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.