Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 13 Apr 2011 (Wednesday) 01:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

b800 or b1600?

 
paintballkidz
Senior Member
757 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: VANCOUVRE BC
     
Apr 13, 2011 01:53 |  #1

About to pull the trigger on one. Is the b1600 worth the extra money for the power?


6D
24L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lichtwerk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,372 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Berlin, Germany
     
Apr 13, 2011 02:17 |  #2

As with everything in photography: it depends.

Do you already have lights? Remember that extra power also comes with a higher minimum power setting.


Dennis
Grip Aficionado
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paintballkidz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
757 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: VANCOUVRE BC
     
Apr 13, 2011 02:19 |  #3

I only own 2 other speedlites 430's. I will be doing a lot of outdoor shooting and also indoors. Portraits etc.


6D
24L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lichtwerk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,372 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Berlin, Germany
     
Apr 13, 2011 02:40 |  #4

I'd say get the 1600, especially with a 5D Mark II :)


Dennis
Grip Aficionado
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Apr 13, 2011 08:27 |  #5

Lichtwerk wrote in post #12211998 (external link)
I'd say get the 1600, especially with a 5D Mark II :)

Why would camera model dictate strobe power ratings?

I will say X1600 if budget allows it. Or better get Einstein.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Apr 13, 2011 09:22 |  #6

It appears that the Einstein backlog is gone.
Based on that I would suggest getting the Einstein. It has a power range from 640Ws to 2.5Ws.

And there are loads of other benefits.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Player9
Senior Member
658 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Apr 13, 2011 09:41 |  #7

bobbyz wrote in post #12212872 (external link)
Why would camera model dictate strobe power ratings?

The larger format camera will have less depth of focus. For example, a 7D using a 50mm lens at, say, six feet from the subject will have more depth of focus than a 5D shooting the exact same picture with a 80mm lens from six feet from the subject. Thus, if you used f/8 for the 7D shot, you might want to use f/11 for the 5D shot. You would want more powerful lights for the 5D. If you moved up to medium format, you would want even more light so that you could use smaller apertures (of course, medium format is great for those really shallow DOF shots that just have the eyes in focus and tons of blur on the ears).


RP, 60D, RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS, RF 35mm f/1.8 IS, RF 50mm f/1.8, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, EF-S 18-135mm 3.5-5.6 IS, EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, EF 28mm f/1.8, EF 50mm f/1.8, EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro, EF 85mm f/1.8, El-100, 430ex, 220ex, Alien Bee B400 (2), Alien Bee B800 (2)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kickmaster
Senior Member
Avatar
569 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 342
Joined Nov 2004
Location: San Diego. CA
     
Apr 13, 2011 09:42 |  #8

Einstein for sure.


Canon Forever! 5D III, 1DX, L Primes & Zooms, Kino-Flo, Einsteins, Interfit's, Diva Ringlight, Phottix Indra 500 TTL, Interfit S1's..... Full studio....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Apr 13, 2011 09:44 |  #9

Player9 wrote in post #12213293 (external link)
The larger format camera will have less depth of focus. For example, a 7D using a 50mm lens at, say, six feet from the subject will have more depth of focus than a 5D shooting the exact same picture with a 80mm lens from six feet from the subject. Thus, if you used f/8 for the 7D shot, you might want to use f/11 for the 5D shot. You would want more powerful lights for the 5D. If you moved up to medium format, you would want even more light so that you could use smaller apertures (of course, medium format is great for those really shallow DOF shots that just have the eyes in focus and tons of blur on the ears).

Overthinking the problem.

To the OP, AB1600 if you are shooting outside. Unfortunately for shooting inside its way to easy to overpower a room with the 1600. You might want to consider the Einstein because of its wider power range.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Apr 13, 2011 10:14 |  #10

Player9 wrote in post #12213293 (external link)
The larger format camera will have less depth of focus. For example, a 7D using a 50mm lens at, say, six feet from the subject will have more depth of focus than a 5D shooting the exact same picture with a 80mm lens from six feet from the subject. Thus, if you used f/8 for the 7D shot, you might want to use f/11 for the 5D shot. You would want more powerful lights for the 5D. If you moved up to medium format, you would want even more light so that you could use smaller apertures (of course, medium format is great for those really shallow DOF shots that just have the eyes in focus and tons of blur on the ears).

That guy said with 5dmk2, like 5dmk2 required more light power than say 5d, or 1ds models. And OP never mentioned anything about his camera.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Apr 13, 2011 10:30 |  #11

Neither.. WL X1600. :)


[ www (external link)ยท flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sigma ­ pi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,204 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Apr 13, 2011 10:33 |  #12

gonzogolf wrote in post #12213318 (external link)
Overthinking the problem.

Not really. I had to shoot a car in a studio. I borrowed a 5DII and I have a 7D at f9 the back end was falling off pretty bad with the 5DII, I tested on my 7D and it was barely there. I had to go to f11 and turn the ISO up.

bobbyz wrote in post #12213500 (external link)
That guy said with 5dmk2, like 5dmk2 required more light power than say 5d, or 1ds models. And OP never mentioned anything about his camera.

:rolleyes: It is in his sig.


Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
http://www.flickr.com …6850267535/in/p​hotostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
Apr 13, 2011 10:42 |  #13

Bottom line, the extra power does make a difference outdoors, if you can pony up the difference, do it. If you find the 1600 too powerful indoors, which you likely may, use the 430's... The Einsteins are great, truly, and offer you a lot more flexibility (like using both indoor and out much easier) and worth it to many for the jump in price, but you know what you can afford/want. If you're solely looking B800/B1600, go 1600.


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sigma ­ pi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,204 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Apr 13, 2011 10:43 |  #14

anlenke wrote in post #12213697 (external link)
Bottom line, the extra power does make a difference outdoors, if you can pony up the difference, do it. If you find the 1600 too powerful indoors, which you likely may, use the 430's... The Einsteins are great, truly, and offer you a lot more flexibility (like using both indoor and out much easier) and worth it to many for the jump in price, but you know what you can afford/want. If you're solely looking B800/B1600, go 1600.

I agree.


Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
http://www.flickr.com …6850267535/in/p​hotostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Apr 13, 2011 12:28 |  #15

sigma pi wrote in post #12213636 (external link)
Not really. I had to shoot a car in a studio. I borrowed a 5DII and I have a 7D at f9 the back end was falling off pretty bad with the 5DII, I tested on my 7D and it was barely there. I had to go to f11 and turn the ISO up.

:rolleyes: It is in his sig.

Can't you use higher ISO in the studio?


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,495 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
b800 or b1600?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1410 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.