5dmkII - 24-105mm
HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
shadowcatcher Member 111 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Jersey Shore, PA More info | Apr 13, 2011 08:54 | #1 5dmkII - 24-105mm HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Canon 5DMKII Gripped, 7D Gripped, 24-105 f4L, 17-40 f4L, 70-200 f4L, 70-200 f2.8L II, 85mm 1.8, 35mm 1.4L, Sigma 50mm 1.4, 10-22 EF-S, 430 EXII, LumoPro 160, Metz 48AF-1, 2x AB1600, 1xAB400
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kechar Goldmember  1,699 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Atlanta, Georgia More info | Apr 13, 2011 09:17 | #2 Lighting a comp are pretty good. Even though #1 is centered I like the pipes thing...not too distracting I don't think. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2011 09:48 | #3 The light looks quite harsh in these, especially in the second picture. It gives the impression a bare flash was used without any modifier.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2011 10:54 | #4 Kechar wrote in post #12213122  Lighting a comp are pretty good. Even though #1 is centered I like the pipes thing...not too distracting I don't think. #2 could be set off center a bit I think. Pose is nice. My real problem is with the choice of top(s) for this model. No offense, but it makes her look pregnant, the way that shaw thing opens up and wraps around her mid section. If the under garment wasn't so noisy (maybe black) it could work, but the way it is it's hideous. No offense to anyone  Thanks for the honesty. That helps the most. I agree about the top. I think it's how I posed the model. I'm still working on posing, and she's only 13 years old(daughter). Canon 5DMKII Gripped, 7D Gripped, 24-105 f4L, 17-40 f4L, 70-200 f4L, 70-200 f2.8L II, 85mm 1.8, 35mm 1.4L, Sigma 50mm 1.4, 10-22 EF-S, 430 EXII, LumoPro 160, Metz 48AF-1, 2x AB1600, 1xAB400
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2011 10:56 | #5 IrishK wrote in post #12213340 The light looks quite harsh in these, especially in the second picture. It gives the impression a bare flash was used without any modifier. #1: -Light from the flash has burned out her right thigh. -The perspective looks odd. It appears as if the subject has very large hands. This is not a feminine pose. -Harsh shadow bleed to the subject's left (camera right). Yeah, light was a bit harsh. I'm working on 1 and 2 light setups, and it was pitch black during this shoot. Didn't have a reflector, and these are shoots for me to get used to my new 5d, as I have been shooting with a 7d for the last year or so. Canon 5DMKII Gripped, 7D Gripped, 24-105 f4L, 17-40 f4L, 70-200 f4L, 70-200 f2.8L II, 85mm 1.8, 35mm 1.4L, Sigma 50mm 1.4, 10-22 EF-S, 430 EXII, LumoPro 160, Metz 48AF-1, 2x AB1600, 1xAB400
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2793 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
