Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 13 Apr 2011 (Wednesday) 09:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Opinions on Lumiquest softbox?

 
HughR
Senior Member
Avatar
999 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Apr 20, 2011 13:51 |  #16

elogical wrote in post #12239867 (external link)
I'd like to use the LTP for situations like, for example, where I have someone someone speaking at a podium and I can clip the LTP in position, then shoot from the middle or back of the room with a longer lens. I'm trying to avoid the snooted straight-flash approach.

The softbox seems to have limited usefulness for moving around a room with it except for when I have someone else to hold it

Softbox III or LTP works well as long as you keep it within 2-3 feet of your subject. At events and parties I often hold the wireless flash with softbox up and to the side in my left hand and shoot the camera using my right hand. It's a photojournalistic technique that works great if you can get close to your subjects. As you indicate, you can alternatively clip an LTP in position near the subject, then move further away for the shots.

I just got back from the Flashbus tour event in Chicago, and both Hobby and McNally use Softbox III and LTP all the time, sometimes just a foot from the subject's face.


Hugh
Canon 60D, Original Digital Rebel (2003)
EFS 15-85mm IS USM, EF 70-300mm IS USM, Tokina 11-16mm
Speedlite 430EX, Speedlite 430EX II,
Qbox 16 pro, Lastolite EZbox 24x24, Lumiquest Softbox III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elogical
Goldmember
Avatar
1,217 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: St Paul, Minnesota
     
Apr 20, 2011 16:40 |  #17

thanks, will try that


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Goshawk
Senior Member
Avatar
841 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Tanzania
     
Apr 21, 2011 09:21 |  #18

Depends how mobile you need to be. Lightstands can be a headache to move around. For outdoor portraits I use a Stroboframe with a 15x18inch softbox and 580EX II(need off-camera shoe cord) mounted on camera. You can either handhold it is light enough or mount on tripod. The light is high above camera, nice and soft. Together with a reflector or two you can shoot great head/shoulder portraits. If I do indoors(where my ST-E2 works) I use a second flash 430EX for extra back or side lighting.

At home I just use studio strobes/lightstands/ big softboxes and umbrellas ha ha still the best.

I have 2 Lumiquest little softboxes they are rubbish. Also have a Gary Fong Lightsphere, also rubbish. As said then rather stick a piece of white cardboard to your flash and bounce it it works better if you cannot get a decent softbox.


1D Mk III - 100mm 2.8 Macro - 24-70mm 2.8L - 70-200mm 2.8L IS - 500mm 4.0L IS - 430EX, 580EX II, ST-E2, Stroboframe, Quantum Turbo (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/deonnaude/ (external link)http://www.flickr.com/​photos/deonnaude/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TweakMDS
Goldmember
Avatar
2,242 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Apr 21, 2011 09:37 |  #19

I don't mind juggling 2 lightstands and a small backlight stand outside, it's the umbrella's that get to me with the slightest wind... A smallish softbox is a lot more wind resistant though, as is bouncing or shooting through a reflector.
All that said, on a windless day, umbrellas beat everything else in the portability vs light quality ratio.


Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
~Michael
Gear | Flickr (external link)
"My featured shots" (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,485 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 21, 2011 10:18 |  #20

I have a Wescott Micro Apollo which is 5" x7", and (when I was actively shooting weddings with film) would use this all the time when in circumstances which provided no ceiling bounce opportunity, simply because 'something is better than nothing at all'. Any shadows cast by body parts or flowers held by the bride are better softened and reduced in contrast, even to a small degree, rather than the very harsh shadows with distracting edges of shadows from a flash lens only. Yes, it might not be a perfect solution, but if you have nothing better available, you use the best tool which is at hand!

This test done to simulate a bride holding a bunch of flowers in front of her. I make an ugly bride, so my face is not shown :lol: :
With only native flash lens, at 20' from subject

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/IMG_1027.jpg

With 5x7 softbox, at 20' from subject
IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/IMG_1026.jpg

Something is definitely better than nothing!

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Apr 21, 2011 11:14 |  #21

I ordered the Lumiquest Softbox III after seeing how Hobby & McNally used it at their seminar recently. Looking forward to using it with a flash on a monopod at wedding receptions, like getting dancefloor and guest shots when able to get it close to the subject.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shankarhokie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,894 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Saline, Michigan
     
Apr 21, 2011 14:05 as a reply to  @ Michelle Brooks Photography's post |  #22

This basic kit $55 is a great start

http://www.mpex.com/br​owse.cfm/4,16699.html (external link)


Shankar
Perpetual learner.
FLICKR (external link) -- Gear-- Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,254 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Opinions on Lumiquest softbox?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2839 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.