Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 16 Apr 2011 (Saturday) 22:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

wireless ettl for bracket use

 
pictureperf
Member
Avatar
199 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 217
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Apr 16, 2011 22:07 |  #1

is there a reasonably priced (somewhat) wireless trigger with ettl for use with a 580ex2 for use on a bracket? I want to get rid of the ocf cord as they are a pain and the Yongnuo's fall apart after awhile. BUT i dont need to spend $600 either unless i have to.
thanks!


Beauty is in the eye of the checkbook holder...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Apr 16, 2011 22:09 |  #2

I use the ST-E2


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14871
Joined Dec 2006
     
Apr 16, 2011 22:11 |  #3

define reasonably priced... ST-e2 would be perhaps your cheapest option at around $150-200 used. The PW controlTL system, radiopoppers, or even the pixel knight system is more pricey. Stick with the short cords




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liupublic
Goldmember
1,114 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Tempe AZ
     
Apr 17, 2011 09:20 |  #4

Pixel Knight (RF wireless ETTL trigger) for one flash (one receiver and one transmitter package) is about $160. Yongnuo ST-E2 clone is about $110. Search on ebay.

Yongnuo ST-E2 has better range than Canon ST-E2 and the AF assist projects further but it's line of sight only. It also rotates so you can aim it toward the flash on a bracket. It might work better for your application.

There are newer ETTL RF trigger coming in the next few months from Pixel and Phottix. No price yet. My guess is that they will be more expensive than Pixel Knight but with better functionality.


Still learning
Nikon D750, Sigma 24-105OS, 105mm 2.8g micro VR, Tamron 70-300VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 415
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Apr 17, 2011 11:59 |  #5

pictureperf wrote in post #12236910 (external link)
is there a reasonably priced (somewhat) wireless trigger with ettl for use with a 580ex2 for use on a bracket? I want to get rid of the ocf cord as they are a pain and the Yongnuo's fall apart after awhile. BUT i dont need to spend $600 either unless i have to.
thanks!

What camera are you using now? Have you considered upgrading to a 60D or 7D for the wireless flash capability?


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
enrigonz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,637 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Miami, FL
     
Apr 17, 2011 12:05 |  #6

msowsun wrote in post #12239464 (external link)
What camera are you using now? Have you considered upgrading to a 60D or 7D for the wireless flash capability?

Wow! You see this exactly the response I try to avoid when responding to someone asking any kind of question..... "go out and buy a new camera"

In this case I don't think buying a new camera with the wireless flash capability will work because they require line of sight. 2 flash heads on a bracket as I understand the OP wanting to do, will need a radio frequency or wire to trigger any flashes on top of the camera if the bracket is anything like mine.


Canon Stuff :) |Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 415
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Apr 17, 2011 12:27 |  #7

enrigonz wrote in post #12239484 (external link)
Wow! You see this exactly the response I try to avoid when responding to someone asking any kind of question..... "go out and buy a new camera"

In this case I don't think buying a new camera with the wireless flash capability will work because they require line of sight. 2 flash heads on a bracket as I understand the OP wanting to do, will need a radio frequency or wire to trigger any flashes on top of the camera if the bracket is anything like mine.

I think if you are going to spend $200-$300 on some form of ETTL wireless capability, spending the same money on a camera upgrade that could accomplish the same thing for you, should at least be considered.

The Canon wireless may be "line of sight" but indoors, (or at very short range outdoors), it works very well without direct line of sight.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liupublic
Goldmember
1,114 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Tempe AZ
     
Apr 17, 2011 12:49 |  #8

If going with ST-E2, Yongnuo version is better than the Canon version because Yongnuo version can rotate a bit to aim toward the bracket. Then rotate the 580EXII so the receiver is facing the ST-E2. This will solve the line of the sight problem.


Still learning
Nikon D750, Sigma 24-105OS, 105mm 2.8g micro VR, Tamron 70-300VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14871
Joined Dec 2006
     
Apr 17, 2011 19:13 |  #9

enrigonz wrote in post #12239484 (external link)
Wow! You see this exactly the response I try to avoid when responding to someone asking any kind of question..... "go out and buy a new camera"

In this case I don't think buying a new camera with the wireless flash capability will work because they require line of sight. 2 flash heads on a bracket as I understand the OP wanting to do, will need a radio frequency or wire to trigger any flashes on top of the camera if the bracket is anything like mine.

I agree with Mike, rather than spend additional for an accessory upgrade the OP could get it in a new camera with all the additional benefits of new technology. While the simple answer is get a better cord and learn to live with it, if the goal is wireless the that solution is as good as any.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,328 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2516
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Apr 17, 2011 19:32 as a reply to  @ gonzogolf's post |  #10

I have just experimented with my 7D using a 420EX flash on an off-camera bracket and shooting outdoors.

When shooting with the sun behind me, the 7D fired the flash even though there was not a nearby subject in the frame. It did not fire the flash when shooting into the sun until I placed a subject in the frame. However once I placed my mannequin head about 6-8 feet from the camera in the frame, the 7D fired the flash wirelessly. I did not experiment to see how far I could get from the head and still have the 7D fire the camera.

I like not having an off camera cord between camera and flash since the module on which the flash sits produces extra torque on the flash foot which I can anticipate causing damage if I moved fast. The feet of the earlier Canon flash units are made of plastic while later flashes have (I believe) metal feet.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Apr 18, 2011 00:45 |  #11

RPCrowe wrote in post #12241711 (external link)
I like not having an off camera cord between camera and flash since the module on which the flash sits produces extra torque on the flash foot which I can anticipate causing damage if I moved fast. The feet of the earlier Canon flash units are made of plastic while later flashes have (I believe) metal feet.

I've been using the ocf cord on a bracket for weddings and have never had a problem with it. I've banged the flash on door frames and chairs and even dropped the whole rig and have never had a flash break off. I've been afraid of breaking it too, so I usually use the 580 on the bracket, because it would be cheaper to replace than the EX II version, but I've never had a problem with it.


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Apr 18, 2011 06:55 |  #12

This is a much debated topic. Everybody has had different experiences.
Mine:
3 OCF chords that went south almost immediate, one of which came apart the first time I pushed the flash on the end.

7D that did not quit live up to my expectations as flash commander

ST-E2 that actually works better than I expected and also works well for low light AF support.

I would love to try out the 3 party unit, not that I would buy one.

The Radio Popper ETTL unit intrigued me, but I didn't really like the DIY feel to it with the sensor thingies and cost.

I almost considered PW's, but RFI issues with the 580's and cost.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Badfisherman
Member
178 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Norway, Me
     
Apr 25, 2011 15:55 as a reply to  @ windpig's post |  #13

I am curious about small flash, bracket type I guess. Pics of these set ups would be very useful for me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Apr 25, 2011 16:08 |  #14

Badfisherman wrote in post #12290692 (external link)
I am curious about small flash, bracket type I guess. Pics of these set ups would be very useful for me.

What are yoy trying to do?


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14871
Joined Dec 2006
     
Apr 25, 2011 16:19 |  #15

Badfisherman wrote in post #12290692 (external link)
I am curious about small flash, bracket type I guess. Pics of these set ups would be very useful for me.

Other than wedding or event work brackets aren't particularly useful. They get your flash off the camera, but really only far enough to direct the shadows slightly downward and to allow you to shoot vertical while keeping the flash properly oriented.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,481 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
wireless ettl for bracket use
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1384 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.