Looking for a semi long prime, got the option to buy a 200mm f2.8 prime, the original not the USM II version, can't find any info for it, can anyone shed some light on this for me.
Thanks
1DCLICKER Member 202 posts Joined Mar 2011 More info | Apr 17, 2011 05:15 | #1 Looking for a semi long prime, got the option to buy a 200mm f2.8 prime, the original not the USM II version, can't find any info for it, can anyone shed some light on this for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Apr 17, 2011 05:33 | #2 Its the same as the USM II version just with a nice retractable hood... Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FatPete Senior Member 287 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Blackpool, UK More info | Apr 17, 2011 05:38 | #3 I picked up a second-hand version I from a forum member last year and it's a superb lens - very sharp and detailed images. I sometimes miss not having IS on the lens, but that's my only 'complaint'.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2011 06:27 | #4 Cheers guys, the lack of IS is not a problem for me, i shoot wide open as much as posible and have a verry steady hand (My hand is better than my spelling, excuse that) Basicly i want a tight portrait lens and the 135 f2 wasnt enough for what i want to use it for and the Sigma 150 2.8 i sold due to being a little soft and AF wasnt acurate (on the copy i had)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nightcat Goldmember 4,533 posts Likes: 28 Joined Aug 2008 More info | Apr 17, 2011 07:50 | #5 I have version 2 of this remarkable lens. I actually think the original version with the retractable hood is the preferable copy. That retractable hood is very convienient and far better that using the hood you have to attach. Right now I own the 300mm f4 and the 400mm 5.6, both which have retractable hoods. I wish there were more lenses with this option.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Apr 17, 2011 07:56 | #6 nightcat wrote in post #12238485 I have version 2 of this remarkable lens. I actually think the original version with the retractable hood is the preferable copy. That retractable hood is very convienient and far better that using the hood you have to attach. Right now I own the 300mm f4 and the 400mm 5.6, both which have retractable hoods. I wish there were more lenses with this option. You'll love the 200mm 2.8. Its my favorite lens. its a boon and a curse Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2011 08:02 | #7 nightcat wrote in post #12238485 I have version 2 of this remarkable lens. I actually think the original version with the retractable hood is the preferable copy. That retractable hood is very convienient and far better that using the hood you have to attach. Right now I own the 300mm f4 and the 400mm 5.6, both which have retractable hoods. I wish there were more lenses with this option. You'll love the 200mm 2.8. Its my favorite lens. So 420 AUD Was a good price? No marks on the glass or body, rarely used as only a month after purchase she bought a 70-200 2.8 IS for the IS and kept this lens with plans to use it but decided to sell. I just bought it so should be here by the end of the week. As it's only 300ks from home. And being a female owner I feel it would be a bit better than buying of a bloke as let's face it lady's seem to baby there gear more than guys.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Apr 17, 2011 08:03 | #8 1DCLICKER wrote in post #12238509 So 420 AUD Was a good price? No marks on the glass or body, rarely used as only a month after purchase she bought a 70-200 2.8 IS for the IS and kept this lens with plans to use it but decided to sell. I just bought it so should be here by the end of the week. As it's only 300ks from home. And being a female owner I feel it would be a bit better than buying of a bloke as let's face it lady's seem to baby there gear more than guys. Hey i was really really careful with my 200mm f/2.8L! Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2011 20:19 | #9 Im sure you were mate as most of us are, but saying what I said I was referring it to an "on average" basis,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Apr 17, 2011 20:34 | #10 -facedesk- Lol Actually it shows my 30D and my 200mm f/2.8L after it went into a snowbank Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
effstop Senior Member 810 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: San Diego More info | Apr 18, 2011 00:50 | #11 I had the mkI for over a year and loved it. Wicked fast af, great iq, and bokeh at 2.8 was awesome. Unfortunately, had to sell to sell to fund another lens. 5D MKI | 1D MKII | 24-70mm 2.8 L | 80-200MM 2.8 L | 400mm 5.6 L |50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2011 04:43 | #12 effstop wrote in post #12243298 I had the mkI for over a year and loved it. Wicked fast af, great iq, and bokeh at 2.8 was awesome. Unfortunately, had to sell to sell to fund another lens. Brilliant, can't wait to get it
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is EBiffany 1601 guests, 97 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||