Hi
Can anybody please point me in the right direction of a review of the new canon ef 17-40mm lens. Some shops now stock them but i don't seem to be able to find any unbiased opinions on the lens.
Thanks
Emily
Using a Canon 10D
emamb Mostly Lurking 15 posts Joined Dec 2002 More info | Apr 28, 2003 10:06 | #1 Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HoodedOne Member 43 posts Joined Mar 2003 More info | Apr 28, 2003 11:51 | #2 Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scottallen Hatchling 4 posts Joined Apr 2003 More info | Apr 30, 2003 16:20 | #3 I think the jury is still out on this lens. I can hardly wait for some direct comparisons between the old 17-35 2.8L, newer 16-35 2.8L (which I own), and the Sigma 15-XX.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lziering Member 148 posts Joined Nov 2002 More info | Apr 30, 2003 17:07 | #4 Fred Miranda's site has some initial user reviews.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Vaio Member 72 posts Joined Mar 2003 More info | Apr 30, 2003 23:04 | #5 I rather get the 24mm 1.4 and have the 50mm 1.4 along with my 10D than the 24-40mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidLawson Member 65 posts Joined May 2002 More info | May 01, 2003 05:19 | #6 Lots of threads on dpreview.com Canon SLR Talk Forum. Generally not being well received as an "L" lens. David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fredlord Member 65 posts Joined Jan 2003 More info | May 02, 2003 10:13 | #7 Michael Reichmann has a nice comparison with the 16-35L f/2.8 at:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1375 guests, 180 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||