Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
Thread started 18 Apr 2011 (Monday) 10:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What Does Chargeback Mean, Should I be concerned?

 
James ­ Emory
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Bay City, MI
     
Apr 18, 2011 10:38 |  #1

I've read a few posts where people have been charged back and scammed. Just what does chargeback mean and is there anything you can do to prevent this? Some folks say Paypal can't help you in that regard. Thanks


James Emory
Olympus E-PL2, VF2 Electronic Viewfinder, Olympus lenses; 14-42mm, 35mm macro, 40-150mm, Manfrotto monopod, Slik U212Tripod, Canon Pixma MP990 Printer, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HyperYagami
Goldmember
2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
     
Apr 18, 2011 11:04 |  #2

James Emory wrote in post #12245287 (external link)
I've read a few posts where people have been charged back and scammed. Just what does chargeback mean and is there anything you can do to prevent this? Some folks say Paypal can't help you in that regard. Thanks

http://www.google.com/​search?q=chargeback (external link)

correct. nothing much you can do about it.



5D3 and a few lens
es.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Emory
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Bay City, MI
     
Apr 18, 2011 11:23 |  #3

HyperYagami wrote in post #12245414 (external link)
http://www.google.com/​search?q=chargeback (external link)

correct. nothing much you can do about it.

Thank you. So it seems like one would be reasonably safe using Paypal since you have to approve any funds taken from your Paypal account. So if the seller is selling something for 50.00 and you send 50.00 through Paypal, then the seller cannot come back asking for 60.00 if you only approved 50.00. Am I thinking correctly?


James Emory
Olympus E-PL2, VF2 Electronic Viewfinder, Olympus lenses; 14-42mm, 35mm macro, 40-150mm, Manfrotto monopod, Slik U212Tripod, Canon Pixma MP990 Printer, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sauer ­ Grapes
Senior Member
Avatar
516 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Chicago
     
Apr 18, 2011 11:29 |  #4

You're missing the point.

A chargeback is something a buyer does after the fact. In legitimate situations, it means that the buyer didn't receive what they paid for, and are using their credit card's protection. In a non-legit situation, it means the buyer is using the chargeback to scam the seller. Paypal doesn't back up sellers in this instance. They may say they do, but their policy is to never lose money, so they'll take it from the seller regardless of the documentation the seller has. They even send the seller to collections as per their policy that I'm sure somewhere states that the seller protection doesn't work if paypal will lose money.


Gear List: 5D MKII, 24-105mm F4L, 135mm F2L, 430 EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hfgarris
Goldmember
Avatar
1,760 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
     
Apr 18, 2011 11:33 |  #5

James Emory wrote in post #12245539 (external link)
Thank you. So it seems like one would be reasonably safe using Paypal since you have to approve any funds taken from your Paypal account. So if the seller is selling something for 50.00 and you send 50.00 through Paypal, then the seller cannot come back asking for 60.00 if you only approved 50.00. Am I thinking correctly?

Yes ... that much of what you said is correct.:)

What most here are complaining about is the chargeback going the other way. The buyer receives the purchased item, then "claims" to PayPal that he never received it, or that it isn't what he expected, and PayPal then returns the sellers money back to the buyer. He now has your item, and your money!:cry::rolleyes:

He may be required by PayPal to return "your item", but there seems to be little recourse if he just sends back a rock instead.

Note: I have had good experiences with PayPal, including a claim dispute recently for non-shippment of a purchase. However, there are many on these forums who have not been so fortunate. It seem PayPal (and eBay) have policies in place to protect the buyers, and scammers have figured out the steps to take to exploit these policies to steal money from honest sellers.

-howard




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Emory
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Bay City, MI
     
Apr 18, 2011 11:40 |  #6

Mmm, sounds like that is the reason some sellers insist on a money order for payment. Obviously they have been scammed at one time or another. The problem I see here is that if the seller dupes the buyer, the buyers only comeback would be to sue the seller. Interesting to know. What led to this question is that I read here on POTN that a buyer bought a lens that was said to be in good working order (a Canon L lens). When he got the lens the MF did not work. He sent the lens to Canon for repair and Canon told him the lens is over 10 years old and they no longer repair it. Outside of paying for a lawyer to try and get his money back, he's pretty much screwed.

Sauer Grapes wrote in post #12245591 (external link)
You're missing the point.

A chargeback is something a buyer does after the fact. In legitimate situations, it means that the buyer didn't receive what they paid for, and are using their credit card's protection. In a non-legit situation, it means the buyer is using the chargeback to scam the seller. Paypal doesn't back up sellers in this instance. They may say they do, but their policy is to never lose money, so they'll take it from the seller regardless of the documentation the seller has. They even send the seller to collections as per their policy that I'm sure somewhere states that the seller protection doesn't work if paypal will lose money.


James Emory
Olympus E-PL2, VF2 Electronic Viewfinder, Olympus lenses; 14-42mm, 35mm macro, 40-150mm, Manfrotto monopod, Slik U212Tripod, Canon Pixma MP990 Printer, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Emory
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Bay City, MI
     
Apr 18, 2011 11:42 |  #7

Mmm, I see where this could get ugly. Obvioulsy it is important to check feedback on the buyer/seller.

hfgarris wrote in post #12245624 (external link)
Yes ... that much of what you said is correct.:)

What most here are complaining about is the chargeback going the other way. The buyer receives the purchased item, then "claims" to PayPal that he never received it, or that it isn't what he expected, and PayPal then returns the sellers money back to the buyer. He now has your item, and your money!:cry::rolleyes:

He may be required by PayPal to return "your item", but there seems to be little recourse if he just sends back a rock instead.

Note: I have had good experiences with PayPal, including a claim dispute recently for non-shippment of a purchase. However, there are many on these forums who have not been so fortunate. It seem PayPal (and eBay) have policies in place to protect the buyers, and scammers have figured out the steps to take to exploit these policies to steal money from honest sellers.

-howard


James Emory
Olympus E-PL2, VF2 Electronic Viewfinder, Olympus lenses; 14-42mm, 35mm macro, 40-150mm, Manfrotto monopod, Slik U212Tripod, Canon Pixma MP990 Printer, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sauer ­ Grapes
Senior Member
Avatar
516 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Chicago
     
Apr 18, 2011 13:18 |  #8

James Emory wrote in post #12245659 (external link)
Mmm, sounds like that is the reason some sellers insist on a money order for payment. Obviously they have been scammed at one time or another. The problem I see here is that if the seller dupes the buyer, the buyers only comeback would be to sue the seller. Interesting to know. What led to this question is that I read here on POTN that a buyer bought a lens that was said to be in good working order (a Canon L lens). When he got the lens the MF did not work. He sent the lens to Canon for repair and Canon told him the lens is over 10 years old and they no longer repair it. Outside of paying for a lawyer to try and get his money back, he's pretty much screwed.

Not exactly, in that situation the buyer could do a chargeback if they used their credit card in paypal. That's what chargebacks are for, and the correct way to use them (when a buyer scams you and you can't get a refund any other way).


Gear List: 5D MKII, 24-105mm F4L, 135mm F2L, 430 EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hfgarris
Goldmember
Avatar
1,760 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
     
Apr 18, 2011 14:42 |  #9

Sauer Grapes wrote in post #12246335 (external link)
Not exactly, in that situation the buyer could do a chargeback if they used their credit card in paypal. That's what chargebacks are for, and the correct way to use them (when a buyer scams you and you can't get a refund any other way).

That is a big advantage to using your credit card rather than available funds or your bank account. The credit card companies have more "clout" with PayPal than you do.

If a scamming seller removes the funds so they aren't available for chargeback, PayPal apparently tells the victim buyer that they are "unable to recover your funds ... sorry!). However, the CC company will assess THEIR PAYEE, who is PayPal, and take the funds back on behalf of the victim buyer regardless of what PayPal says.

One would think that the 3% fees that PayPal collects would be used to buy insurance, or self insure, so they could make good on their published "safety guarantee" for both the buyer and seller, but they apparently just keep that money for themselves. They are never dealing with PayPal money if there is a loss ... it is either the buyers money, or the sellers money. If it is no longer available for payback, you are out of luck ... "Sorry"!:rolleyes:

-howard




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alpha_1976
Goldmember
Avatar
3,961 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: USA
     
Apr 18, 2011 14:45 |  #10

hfgarris wrote in post #12246935 (external link)
That is a big advantage to using your credit card rather than available funds or your bank account. The credit card companies have more "clout" with PayPal than you do.

If a scamming seller removes the funds so they aren't available for chargeback, PayPal apparently tells the victim buyer that they are "unable to recover your funds ... sorry!). However, the CC company will assess THEIR PAYEE, who is PayPal, and take the funds back on behalf of the victim buyer regardless of what PayPal says.

One would think that the 3% fees that PayPal collects would be used to buy insurance, or self insure, so they could make good on their published "safety guarantee" for both the buyer and seller, but they apparently just keep that money for themselves. They are never dealing with PayPal money if there is a loss ... it is either the buyers money, or the sellers money. If it is no longer available for payback, you are out of luck ... "Sorry"!:rolleyes:

-howard

Exactly! And this is the reason Paypal doesn't want you to use CC when you make a payment.


I know more about gear than I know about photography :p
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hfgarris
Goldmember
Avatar
1,760 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
     
Apr 18, 2011 14:51 |  #11

alpha_1976 wrote in post #12246954 (external link)
Exactly! And this is the reason Paypal doesn't want you to use CC when you make a payment.

Yeah ... they do make it difficult to find with no way to set it as the default! :confused:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Emory
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Bay City, MI
     
Apr 18, 2011 15:06 |  #12

hfgarris wrote in post #12246992 (external link)
Yeah ... they do make it difficult to find with no way to set it as the default! :confused:

It can be done though, correct? I was thinking of linking my Paypal to a Visa debit card and never keep any money in that account the debit card is linked to. Just put enough in the account to cover whatever I buy. Right now my Paypal is linked to one of my bank accounts. I'm starting not to like that idea.


James Emory
Olympus E-PL2, VF2 Electronic Viewfinder, Olympus lenses; 14-42mm, 35mm macro, 40-150mm, Manfrotto monopod, Slik U212Tripod, Canon Pixma MP990 Printer, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hfgarris
Goldmember
Avatar
1,760 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
     
Apr 18, 2011 15:22 |  #13

James Emory wrote in post #12247084 (external link)
It can be done though, correct? I was thinking of linking my Paypal to a Visa debit card and never keep any money in that account the debit card is linked to. Just put enough in the account to cover whatever I buy. Right now my Paypal is linked to one of my bank accounts. I'm starting not to like that idea.

You can set up your PayPal account on a credit card only, but getting the money back out might be a problem. You need a way to transfer received money back to your bank account, unless you want to keep it in your PayPal account which is a really bad idea!

Although the debit card with an empty account is probably workable, I don't think you will have the assistance of Visa in resolving the dispute that you have with using a credit card. With a credit card, it is Visa's money at stake until you pay, and they usually limit your loss. Thus it is in their interest to get the money back and they have the clout to do so. With a "debit" account, it is your money, with no backing from the bank or Visa. So you are out the whole loss with no real support from anyone else in the event of a scam.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Emory
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Bay City, MI
     
Apr 18, 2011 15:44 |  #14

hfgarris wrote in post #12247172 (external link)
You can set up your PayPal account on a credit card only, but getting the money back out might be a problem. You need a way to transfer received money back to your bank account, unless you want to keep it in your PayPal account which is a really bad idea!

Although the debit card with an empty account is probably workable, I don't think you will have the assistance of Visa in resolving the dispute that you have with using a credit card. With a credit card, it is Visa's money at stake until you pay, and they usually limit your loss. Thus it is in their interest to get the money back and they have the clout to do so. With a "debit" account, it is your money, with no backing from the bank or Visa. So you are out the whole loss with no real support from anyone else in the event of a scam.

I believe you are absolutely correct in your statement. Will just be careful as I have been in the past with who I buy something from. So far I have had no problems with POTN members. Thanks a lot for your input.


James Emory
Olympus E-PL2, VF2 Electronic Viewfinder, Olympus lenses; 14-42mm, 35mm macro, 40-150mm, Manfrotto monopod, Slik U212Tripod, Canon Pixma MP990 Printer, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

527 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
What Does Chargeback Mean, Should I be concerned?
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2020 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.