Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 22 Apr 2011 (Friday) 15:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

available light portrait

 
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13439
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Apr 22, 2011 15:29 |  #1

IMAGE: http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y118/airfrogusmc/Albert2.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnaengus
Senior Member
494 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2009
     
Apr 22, 2011 15:40 |  #2

That is well lit with the available light. I like it as an executive portrait. I understand that you want the background out of focus, however, I think it would have more impact if we could tell what is in the background so it can be a part of the story. It is so OOF, it is distracting to me.


finndogphoto.com

5Dmkii, 16-35 2.8L, 35 1.4L, 50 1.2L, 85 1.2L, 24-105 4L, 70-200 2.8 L IS, 580 EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13439
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Apr 22, 2011 15:44 |  #3

johnaengus wrote in post #12273822 (external link)
That is well lit with the available light. I like it as an executive portrait. I understand that you want the background out of focus, however, I think it would have more impact if we could tell what is in the background so it can be a part of the story. It is so OOF, it is distracting to me.

Trust me, you would find it a lot more distracting if it were sharp. Way to busy for this kind of thing and the focus needs to be entirely on the subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Q-Man
Goldmember
Avatar
1,043 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
     
Apr 22, 2011 17:56 |  #4

Awesome shot as usual from you and that subject isolation with the background blur is great. I love what that 200 f2 can do!

Q


6D | 7D MkII | 16-35 f4L | 35 f1.2L II | 135 f2L | 180 f3.5L | 400 f5.6L
breathephoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13439
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Apr 22, 2011 18:14 |  #5

Q-Man wrote in post #12274439 (external link)
Awesome shot as usual from you and that subject isolation with the background blur is great. I love what that 200 f2 can do!

Q

Thanks Q




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,084 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
     
Apr 22, 2011 18:18 |  #6

I'm guessing subject is a newscaster? I really like the color pop you have there. Nice job.

dave


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LiberationFrequency
Goldmember
1,334 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Montreal, QC
     
Apr 22, 2011 18:21 |  #7

I saw this and immediately knew it was the 200/2.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m.c.chavez
Member
Avatar
157 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: P-Town, OR
     
Apr 22, 2011 18:45 as a reply to  @ LiberationFrequency's post |  #8

her eyes seem to be distracted else were in a kind of wired way.. :) but very nice and very good use of available light.


Filters are like Condoms ... Protection at loss of some quality.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyMN
Goldmember
3,131 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
     
Apr 22, 2011 18:55 |  #9

Those blurred blue bright spots in the background kind of distract me\y eye from the subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
essvee
Member
115 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Apr 22, 2011 19:45 as a reply to  @ RandyMN's post |  #10

Nice shot. I like the background blur. Having said that, if it were my shot I'd crop it, perhaps square, so there was less of it. So it wasn't competing with the main subject for attention due to how colorful it is, the "mass" of it and whether or not the viewer is supposed to understand what it was before it got blurred.

IMHO, I think we, as photographers, also kind of get caught up a little too much in evaluating background blur (or bokeh if you prefer) at the expense of what we're really supposed to be doing. In this case, capturing an image of an executive, news personality or whatever she is. I think that was done well.

This lens does produce some really pleasing depth separation!

Again, nice shot!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13439
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Apr 22, 2011 20:03 |  #11

essvee wrote in post #12274938 (external link)
Nice shot. I like the background blur. Having said that, if it were my shot I'd crop it, perhaps square, so there was less of it. So it wasn't competing with the main subject for attention due to how colorful it is, the "mass" of it and whether or not the viewer is supposed to understand what it was before it got blurred.

IMHO, I think we, as photographers, also kind of get caught up a little too much in evaluating background blur (or bokeh if you prefer) at the expense of what we're really supposed to be doing. In this case, capturing an image of an executive, news personality or whatever she is. I think that was done well.

This lens does produce some really pleasing depth separation!

Again, nice shot!

Thanks and I like space around my subjects. I picked the location because I got the right catch lights in her eyes and because of the blue n the background and the way it balanced the subject. Her eyes, the color of her jacket and the background with just enough warm brick color to balance the cool I think all work well together as well as the negative space. Well, anyway, this is the way I saw and shot it. Art Directors happy, so is the client and so am I.

Don't know if you noticed but I also had her in a place where I was getting a little hair light too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
leeport
Senior Member
Avatar
816 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2008
     
Apr 22, 2011 20:14 |  #12

Damn nice shot! I love everything about this photo. Negative space works well here. Bokeh is nice and right for this shot. If I had a critique, I might have fixed her slightly off color tooth in pp. But hey...who am I eh.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
njekin
Member
69 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Knoxville,TN
     
Apr 22, 2011 21:35 |  #13

Nice shot!


Live with dream!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stayhumble
Goldmember
1,328 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
     
Apr 24, 2011 23:13 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

distraction to me as well. if you wanted this much bokeh and separation, i woulda just went with a different background. makes you wanting to wonder what was behind her or at least see more of it.

try shooting at just a tad bit smaller, like at 2.8


There are no rules for a good photograph and there are no excuses for a bad one.
SELLING:40D, 50D, 10-22, Tamron 17-50 non VC, 5D, 14MM II, 24-105, 70-200 f/4 IS, 430EX, 530EX (ALL MINT W/Box)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
Apr 24, 2011 23:20 |  #15

I can see its her desk and monitor, but I'm of the mind that it would've been better if you'd taken a step to your right and framed her in the white/beige, the red and the screens compete with her for attention. The portrait is a nice one, and the depth of field is really beautiful, but I don't think the background helps you much here.


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,371 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
available light portrait
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1608 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.