Just thought of something while talking in the 5D III thread and decided id post it here
in the 5DIII thread things seem pretty split down two sides...
Side 1 wants the 5DIII to be a modest upgrade of the 5II, a new sensor and that but overall they just dont feel it needs a faster AF or frame rate as they think its going to push the price of the 5DIII up closer to the 1 series
Side 2 wants a BIG upgrade, a new sensor, 1-series AF, quicker frame rates on par with the D700 and 7D (its not full frame but still) and MUCH improved weathersealing, Basically they want a 1Ds in a smaller form factor
So my question is, Why not have both?
Take the 5DIII and reposition it in the market, Give it a modest upgrade, a new high res sensor, keep the AF at 9 points, same framerate, same build, and price it lower, say $2000 or $2200
At the low price theres no question it would have VERY high sales
Then offer another camera, I'll just call it the 3D because the numbering makes sense...
Give it upgraded AF, a sensor tailored for high ISO shooting, Better sealing, advance rates on par with the 7D/Nikon D700 and price it at $3200
Then we have the 1Ds IV, give it the same high res sensor as the 5DIII, but with different processors and that, tweaked and tuned and do everything possible to give it the highest possible image quality, not just resolution but also DR on the market, Basically the 1Ds becomes a cam designed to go against entry level medium format bodies

