Hello everyone, I am new here. I am retired from the Army and now focusing on my photography. Here is some of my images. I am a bit rusty, but I am very interested in becoming a good wildlife and bird photographer.
DM1975 Senior Member 272 posts Joined Apr 2011 Location: Kansas More info | Apr 24, 2011 11:13 | #1 Hello everyone, I am new here. I am retired from the Army and now focusing on my photography. Here is some of my images. I am a bit rusty, but I am very interested in becoming a good wildlife and bird photographer. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jgrussell Looking around nervously 18,758 posts Likes: 14 Joined May 2008 Location: NJ USA More info | Apr 24, 2011 13:02 | #2 Welcome, and lovely shots. -- jgr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rayman64 Member 60 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Stoke on trent uk More info | agree the watermark is far to prominent that aside they are very good shots of a difficult subject keep it up My website http://www.ortonphotography.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkerr Goldmember 3,042 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA. More info | Apr 24, 2011 15:56 | #4 Unless you're a professional photographer who makes a living at photography, I personally don't really see a need for a watermark. However, if you're are going to use one then I would recommend it not being so intrusive, and you might consider turning off "Image Editing OK". Wouldn't be too practical for anyone to edit you picture with the watermark. Tim Kerr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trmwf Goldmember More info | Apr 24, 2011 16:09 | #5 i have to agree with everyone here so far. Lose the auto and go to at least some form of manual. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oldjackssparrows Jeeeez, incredible comments! More info | Apr 24, 2011 19:56 | #6 I can't say it better......... but Welcome to the forum, you will get lots of help and advice here, this is a very friendly forum, if you put a shot on the internet, it can be copied very easily, if some one wants one of your shots on the internet they will get it. Lets see some more with out the watermark! Donate to Pekka, help pay our server costs...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
akhan Cream of the Crop 5,215 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Hong Kong More info | Apr 24, 2011 20:26 | #7 welcome to forum, lovely shots 1Dx, 7d II, Canon 200 F2 IS, Canon 600 F/4 IS, Canon 400 F/2.8 IS II, Canon 85 1.2 II, Canon 50 f/1.8II, Canon 1.4 TC III + Canon 2x III TC + Kenko 1.4 TC + Kenko Tubes, PS5, LR4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2011 20:27 | #8 Thanks. I screwed up on the watermark and now I have to re-load those images to get it removed. I agree as well about it, I just have not had time to fix it yet. As for shooting in auto or manual, I shoot either in complete manual mode or in AV or TV but never on auto that I can ever remember unless being bumped there by accident. Will have to check my meta data on those images but I am almost positive I was shooting in shutter priority on them. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkerr Goldmember 3,042 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA. More info | Apr 24, 2011 20:37 | #9 DM1975 wrote in post #12285626 Thanks. I screwed up on the watermark and now I have to re-load those images to get it removed. I agree as well about it, I just have not had time to fix it yet. As for shooting in auto or manual, I shoot either in complete manual mode or in AV or TV but never on auto that I can ever remember unless being bumped there by accident. Will have to check my meta data on those images but I am almost positive I was shooting in shutter priority on them. Camera Maker: Canon Tim Kerr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2011 20:44 | #10 It had to have been bumped there by accident. I have never consciously shot in auto. I started in film with a Pentax K1000 with no auto anything and don't like shooting in auto at all. I even shoot with my strobes on manual most of the time too. Either way I do not see where it hurt the images here unless you think I should trash them for being on auto? Please don't think that the auto setting is what my photos should be judged by. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkerr Goldmember 3,042 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA. More info | Apr 24, 2011 20:48 | #11 DM1975 wrote in post #12285723 Either way I do not see where it hurt the images here unless you think I should trash them for being on auto? Please don't think that the auto setting is what my photos should be judged by. Nah, They are mighty fine images. Please don't take insult to suggestions to use full manual. Whatever you are comfortable with. Tim Kerr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2011 20:55 | #12 Mine is within arms reach of me sitting on my shelf with my Russian TLR and my old Brownie Hawkeye with bulb flash. I think I have an old roll of ektachrome(sp?) in it. honestly tho, I hate shooting in Auto or the big green P. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkerr Goldmember 3,042 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA. More info | Apr 24, 2011 21:12 | #13 DM1975 wrote in post #12285794 Mine is within arms reach of me sitting on my shelf with my Russian TLR and my old Brownie Hawkeye with bulb flash. I think I have an old roll of ektachrome(sp?) in it. honestly tho, I hate shooting in Auto or the big green P. I've somehow accidentally turned it to something other than manual, and then when I go to adjust the shutter speed or f/stop I wonder why it's not working right. So I know it can be done. Don't sweat it, just keep shooting nice pictures like that. Tim Kerr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2011 21:52 | #14 Ok, the photos should be replaced soon with non-watermarked ones. I will be adding a less intrusive one thoughas a bunch of my photos I took while in Iraq got spread all across a bunch of French websites once. Gonna stick with some kind of watermarking. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jgrussell Looking around nervously 18,758 posts Likes: 14 Joined May 2008 Location: NJ USA More info | Apr 24, 2011 22:14 | #15 DM1975 wrote in post #12286104 Gonna stick with some kind of watermarking. Most of us use some watermarking, but the fact is, you really have to choose between showing off your work and protecting it. These days, it's really not possible to do both. Me, I only upload a 9x7 max size 100dpi image with an unobtrusive watermark. Somebody could take it, crop the watermark and print it, but it'd make a crappy 8x10, so... -- jgr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1061 guests, 171 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||