dingdong Senior Member 250 posts Joined Apr 2011 More info | Apr 28, 2011 15:25 | #16 robert61 wrote in post #12307895  If you get a full frame, the 35mm and 70-200 2.8 IS MkII are the ticket. The holy grail is the 35, 85, and 135 if you want to stay fixed primes. But the 70-200 is sooo very good. if you could only buy 1 lens at the moment...which one would you buy first b/w the 35L and the 70-200 2.8L?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 29, 2011 17:53 | #17 Tough call, but I would go with the 35 L first. Sony A1, 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II, 70-200mm F/2.8 GM OSS II, 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS, 35mm f/1.4 GM, Viltrox 16mm f/1.8, 1.4X TC, Flashpoint flashes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pprice Goldmember  1,714 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Gods Country (aka Mississippi) More info | Apr 30, 2011 19:04 | #18 I would say on a crop body for weddings I would get the 35L before I got the 70-200 just for the simple fact that in most cases you can get closer to the action, but find it hard to get away from it (especially indoors at weddings and such). 1D MKIII 16-35 2.8L MKII 24-70 2.8L 70-200 2.8L [COLOR=black]IS 300 2.8L IS (few others) Bunch of AB lighting
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart  24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Apr 30, 2011 20:09 | #19 Depends on what lens you have already. If you are asking what would I get if I had a choice between only the 35L and the 70-200, I would get the 35 of course.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 552 guests, 151 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
