Its 2am...'nuff said -- ver 9.0

A tribesman.... Tribe is called "The Beach" btw, Fricks..these were taken with Canon 500D

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Hey all, who wants pie?

neeko wrote in post #12342767
Hey all, who wants pie?

Caramel pie please

neeko wrote in post #12342767
Hey all, who wants pie?

Yay pie :3

monk3y wrote in post #12342732
I like it coz when you point at the color LR automatically chooses the slider to adjust...

sometimes I get confused if I should increase Aqua or Blue or in leaves green or yellow... but with using it LR check which one to use and increase both if it needs to increase both

That way when I am saturating...I don't create false color anymore..just more pop

Yeah thats cool.

I don't abuse my saturation sliders like you do though

*sigh* wrote in post #12342777
Yeah thats cool.

I don't abuse my saturation sliders like you do though

I don't really abuse them...its just very colorful where I live

neeko wrote in post #12342767
Hey all, who wants pie?

Mince and cheese please!

monk3y wrote in post #12342759
That's true fricks... or I am seriously thinking of going 2 system for a while. don't wanna rush selling the Nikon stuff as I am sure I'll lose a lot of money

and I want 2 bodies..and since I am just playing with my gear I could just use one gear or the other when I go travel depends on my mood

I like the idea actually haha but definitely buying expensive lenses on Canon only...might not even add any more lenses on the Nikon side

I think it would be better for you to get a more expensive wide angle then the 70-200 vrII
Because most all your shots are landscape unless your thinking about getting Into some telephoto. (saying this not knowing what your lens are). I think you should just stick to nikon for a back up instead of getting two systems so you could use both lens perfectly on both camera. Just my 2 cent

FricksPhotography wrote in post #12342790
I think it would be better for you to get a more expensive wide angle then the 70-200 vrII
Because most all your shots are landscape unless your thinking about getting Into some telephoto. (saying this not knowing what your lens are). I think you should just stick to nikon for a back up instead of getting two systems so you could use both lens perfectly on both camera. Just my 2 cent

not really liking the situation with Nikon here... if I will not lose a lot of money on the D700 I would definitely switch, I just don't wanna rush things..actually I don't need to rush things I could definitely wait until I can sell the D700 at the price I want hehe

if I am gonna stick with Nikon I definitely am not buying anything expensive... nowhere to go in case I need repairs.

monk3y wrote in post #12342810
not really liking the situation with Nikon here... if I will not lose a lot of money on the D700 I would definitely switch, I just don't wanna rush things..actually I don't need to rush things I could definitely wait until I can sell the D700 at the price I want hehe

if I am gonna stick with Nikon I definitely am not buying anything expensive... nowhere to go in case I need repairs.

Ok let me ask this question. Why do you want (need) to switch?

Jake my cheap wide angle can do this...its not really bad

(sorry guys I really like this photo haha)... I am thinking of framing this and giving it to my sister..she lives in that building where I took the shot

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stevenang/48925​29594/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stevenang/47674​88834/

FricksPhotography wrote in post #12342816
Ok let me ask this question. Why do you want (need) to switch?

because I want to buy expensive lenses and when I do I want to have good support available... Nikon distributor is a rip off so I need to buy Gray units..now with gray units the problem is service centers (I don't have anywhere to go to). while Canon service center is just 10 minutes away from me hehe

monk3y wrote in post #12342820
Jake my cheap wide angle can do this...its not really bad

(sorry guys I really like this photo haha)... I am thinking of framing this and giving it to my sister..she lives in that building where I took the shot

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stevenang/48925​29594/
helipadphoto-4798 by bee_tee_double_you, on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stevenang/47674​88834/ to Mantalungon by bee_tee_double_you, on Flickr[/IMG]

Ya I see what your saying but when I had my 28-135 and switched to the 24-105 I noticed a huge increase in color (you saturate your photos it dosnt even matter. Haha but so do I:lol just trying to think what would be the best bet with the money.

FricksPhotography wrote in post #12342733
Edit: just noticed I'm a senior member I feel old.

Jake i mentioned this last night, now Steven will be calling us both seniors

FricksPhotography wrote in post #12342832
Ya I see what your saying but when I had my 28-135 and switched to the 24-105 I noticed a huge increase in color (you saturate your photos it dosnt even matter. Haha but so do I:lol just trying to think what would be the best bet with the money.

if we are talking about colors...its Canon hands down... no argument here