Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 27 Apr 2011 (Wednesday) 22:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Final Edit On Landscape Picture

 
wardzach2007
Senior Member
Avatar
379 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Houston
     
Apr 27, 2011 22:49 |  #1

Okay, so I finally finished up my Skyline picture of the city. As far as the editing goes, yay or nay?

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5228/5663484948_231f6cc221_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spike44
Goldmember
2,155 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2007
     
Apr 27, 2011 23:22 |  #2

Looks super to me - maybe ease up on the sky exposure as it is a bit blown. Should be easy to mask the buildings given the straight lines and apply exposure adjustment just to the sky/clouds.
Would also leave the converging verticals (buildings) as is.....they are soo far away it looks a bit unnatural if they are all too straight.
Good job!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wardzach2007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
379 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Houston
     
Apr 27, 2011 23:31 |  #3

Spike44 wrote in post #12307331 (external link)
Looks super to me - maybe ease up on the sky exposure as it is a bit blown. Should be easy to mask the buildings given the straight lines and apply exposure adjustment just to the sky/clouds.
Would also leave the converging verticals (buildings) as is.....they are soo far away it looks a bit unnatural if they are all too straight.
Good job!

Could you explain this more?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spike44
Goldmember
2,155 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2007
     
Apr 28, 2011 00:00 |  #4

wardzach2007 - notice how the buildings are leaning towards the centre (perspective or vertical convergence). This can be avoided depending on the lens you use or fixed in PP to be straighter - but will affect the rest of the photo. I am anticipating others comments on this to correct it - all I am saying is it looks OK to me...it is not all that bad.:)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Apr 28, 2011 06:35 as a reply to  @ Spike44's post |  #5

I'd do some more work on pulling down the highlights a bit...some of the buildings are blending into the sky and large cloud, losing some definition (you'd need to be careful with the reflections in the glass as well...they can't be brighter than the sky).

The scene probably would have worked much better without the bus on the bridge.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Apr 28, 2011 07:38 as a reply to  @ argyle's post |  #6

We can tell that you've spent some time on this image but, you might want to consider re shooting the scene with the following in mind: Use a longer lens to rid yourself of the converging roofs that everyone has mentioned.
Or, if you only have a WA lens, you don't mention what PP software you use, use your perspective control tool to spread the rooftops to the point that they are parallel.
Also, you might want to use curves or levels to inject some darker tones into the scene.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wardzach2007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
379 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Houston
     
Apr 28, 2011 07:54 |  #7

Okay, that's what I thought it meant. I was using 10-22mm lens on this one. Maybe that was the distortion?

I took out everything but the bus because I didn't know how too. I took out everything else in the picture as far as distractions go but the bus was out of my skill level on CS5. lol




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Apr 28, 2011 08:19 as a reply to  @ wardzach2007's post |  #8

Check out this link to get MFT Characteristics on your lens http://www.canon-europe.com …n/ef_lens_work_​iii_en.asp (external link) it will give you an idea of why I always use a long lens for landscape work, to the point of photomerging if necessary.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JTX
Goldmember
Avatar
1,777 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Sep 2010
Location: South Texas
     
Apr 28, 2011 11:15 |  #9

wardzach2007 wrote in post #12308755 (external link)
Okay, that's what I thought it meant. I was using 10-22mm lens on this one. Maybe that was the distortion?

I took out everything but the bus because I didn't know how too. I took out everything else in the picture as far as distractions go but the bus was out of my skill level on CS5. lol


You did good though. As was said, the buildings need to contrast more with the sky. What I would do is pick a dusk time and re-shoot it, and also try one at night. It seems to be a good location though.

I have the 10-22 also. It's great lens.


http://gallerytx.com (external link)
5DMK3 & 7DMK2 - 10-22, 50mm-1.4, 24-70mm f/2.8L II, 100-400mmL, 70-200 F/2.8L IS II / 270EX, 580EXII  :p
Celestron Ultima 11 Schmidt-Cassegrain

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,403 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Final Edit On Landscape Picture
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1125 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.