Okay, so I finally finished up my Skyline picture of the city. As far as the editing goes, yay or nay?
wardzach2007 Senior Member 379 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Houston More info | Apr 27, 2011 22:49 | #1 Okay, so I finally finished up my Skyline picture of the city. As far as the editing goes, yay or nay?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Apr 27, 2011 23:22 | #2 Looks super to me - maybe ease up on the sky exposure as it is a bit blown. Should be easy to mask the buildings given the straight lines and apply exposure adjustment just to the sky/clouds.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 27, 2011 23:31 | #3 Spike44 wrote in post #12307331 Looks super to me - maybe ease up on the sky exposure as it is a bit blown. Should be easy to mask the buildings given the straight lines and apply exposure adjustment just to the sky/clouds. Would also leave the converging verticals (buildings) as is.....they are soo far away it looks a bit unnatural if they are all too straight. Good job! Could you explain this more?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Apr 28, 2011 00:00 | #4 wardzach2007 - notice how the buildings are leaning towards the centre (perspective or vertical convergence). This can be avoided depending on the lens you use or fixed in PP to be straighter - but will affect the rest of the photo. I am anticipating others comments on this to correct it - all I am saying is it looks OK to me...it is not all that bad.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | I'd do some more work on pulling down the highlights a bit...some of the buildings are blending into the sky and large cloud, losing some definition (you'd need to be careful with the reflections in the glass as well...they can't be brighter than the sky). "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
We can tell that you've spent some time on this image but, you might want to consider re shooting the scene with the following in mind: Use a longer lens to rid yourself of the converging roofs that everyone has mentioned. The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2011 07:54 | #7 Okay, that's what I thought it meant. I was using 10-22mm lens on this one. Maybe that was the distortion?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Check out this link to get MFT Characteristics on your lens http://www.canon-europe.com …n/ef_lens_work_iii_en.asp The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 28, 2011 11:15 | #9 wardzach2007 wrote in post #12308755 Okay, that's what I thought it meant. I was using 10-22mm lens on this one. Maybe that was the distortion? I took out everything but the bus because I didn't know how too. I took out everything else in the picture as far as distractions go but the bus was out of my skill level on CS5. lol
http://gallerytx.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1125 guests, 149 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||