IMG_1201-Edit-Edit-2
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danluk/5670410878/
IMG_2511-Edit
antifire Senior Member 667 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Munich, Germany More info | Apr 29, 2011 13:20 | #1 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danluk/5669839539/ IMG_1201-Edit-Edit-2 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danluk/5670410878/ IMG_2511-Edit
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hegi Member 142 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Wuppertal, Germany More info | Apr 29, 2011 14:04 | #2 I really like both - natural light? 7D · 50D · SIGMA 30MM f/1.4, CANON 85MM f/1.8, CANON 17-55MM f/2.8, CANON 70-200mm f/2.8 IS · SPEEDLIGHTS, ELINCHROM SKYPORTS AND OTHER LIGHTING STUFF · MANFROTTO 055XPROB, 488RC2 · LOWEPRO Classified Sling 180 AW · FLICKR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 30, 2011 04:47 | #3 hello, yes both are natural light!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chrispanas Senior Member More info | Apr 30, 2011 05:20 | #4 1. Don't crop hands and feet of your models because it looks very bad and it's a very common mistake. Pay more attention to model's pose, she looks like she's got her shoulders twice as wide as her loins which looks a bit creepy. I like the overall mood and colors but the cropping killed this photo for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 30, 2011 08:05 | #5 wtf
LOG IN TO REPLY |
leeport Senior Member 816 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2008 More info | Apr 30, 2011 19:25 | #6 Agree about the models hands and feet. It is a common mistake. No worries...just try to remember that next time. Also agree that its not flattering to shoot a woman square on. It makes her look larger than she is. I do like the first one though, albeit for the hands being cut off.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoJo2fast Goldmember 1,759 posts Likes: 94 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Apr 30, 2011 20:12 | #7 I like both. Jordan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GoRk Senior Member 587 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Apr 30, 2011 20:22 | #8 #1 is great...personaly the center of the image is so strong that i hardly noticed the choped off hands...good work... My Facebook fan page https://www.facebook.com …otography/161698317237346
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 01, 2011 04:03 | #9 yup, this is the same rach as the one i posted here:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2686 guests, 152 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||