Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 30 Apr 2011 (Saturday) 16:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Had a clueless guy accuse me of taking away his business

 
cbknight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,767 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Texas
     
May 02, 2011 17:48 |  #121

airfrogusmc wrote in post #12334970 (external link)
Can you read?

Do you want to be the say the wedding photographer that uses the volume plan (walmart) and because of his pricing he has to book 100 weddings a year to make it work or do you want to be the guy that books 25 weddings a year and makes more than the guy shooting 100 wedding a year? Who's the smart guy?

Your under the impression that the volume shooters are making less than the "smart" Photographers. There are many options to avoid burnout. Hiring additional Photographers as Gene Ho did. He isn't the highest priced wedding photographer. He does a massive volume but started out ticking all other wedding photogs with his pricing.

Or as Zack Arias stated in his seminar, he stated he used to shoot bands for $250. He got overwhelmed with business. He went up on his prices (something y'all say can't be done). He went to $350. To $450. Now, he is $2500 a day. So don't tell me it can't be done.

Can I read? You never responded to whether your as high as zack Arias, if not, your cheaping out the pro's. Period. There is always someone higher. your as guilty as the ones your calling out. If your such a stickler on pricing, why are you not charging like the pro's?


Craig
4K Photography Studio
[/URL]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,949 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13349
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
May 02, 2011 17:53 |  #122

cbknight wrote in post #12335061 (external link)
Your under the impression that the volume shooters are making less than the "smart" Photographers. There are many options to avoid burnout. Hiring additional Photographers as Gene Ho did. He isn't the highest priced wedding photographer. He does a massive volume.

Or as Zack Arias stated in his seminar, he stated he used to shoot bands for $250. He got overwhelmed with business. He went up on his prices (something y'all say can't be done). He went to $350. To $450. Now, he is $2500 a day. So don't tell me it can't be done.

Can I read? You never responded to whether your as high as zack Arias if not, your cheeping out the pro's. Period. There is always someone higher. your as guilty as the ones your calling out. If your such a stickler on pricing, why are you not charging like the pro's?

I didn't say the were making less I said they weren't working as smart.

I guess it all boils down to do you want to get hired for your price or your talent, creativity and vision. I went for the later.

My prices are mine and my clients business but I will tell you this his prices are not all that high or out of line and I can also tell you this there are many commercial shooters in this area making a lot more. ;) YOU? :lol::lol::lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cbknight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,767 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Texas
     
May 02, 2011 17:59 |  #123

airfrogusmc wrote in post #12335089 (external link)
I didn't say the were making less I said they weren't working as smart.

I guess it all boils down to do you want to get hired for your price or your talent, creativity and vision. I went for the later.

My prices are mine and my clients business but I will tell you this his prices are not all that high or out of line and I can also tell you this there are many commercial shooters in this are making a lot more. ;) YOU? :lol::lol::lol:

Didn't say his prices were out of line. I'm saying if your as highly professional as your stating, your not in line with the other pro's. You didn't answer twice, so your not. Practice what you preach :lol::lol::lol:

I never said I was a pro. But I am hired for my creativity. Hear it every day. When/if I want to go up on my prices I will. That's my prerogative and not your business. I suggest you tend to yours.


Craig
4K Photography Studio
[/URL]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,949 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13349
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
May 02, 2011 18:02 |  #124

cbknight wrote in post #12335115 (external link)
Didn't say his prices were out of line. I'm saying if your as highly professional as your stating, your not in line with the other pro's. You didn't answer twice, so your not. Practice what you preach :lol::lol::lol:

I never said I was a pro. But I am hired for my creativity. Hear it every day. When/if I want to go up on my prices I will. That's my prerogative and not your business. I suggest you tend to yours.

I do practice what I preach, I am in line with other high end pros in fact more expensive than most that shoot what I do. ;)

Again I said those that have no or little value for what they create. Never mentioned or called out anyone in particular but those that have little or no value for what they create.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cbknight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,767 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Texas
     
May 02, 2011 18:06 |  #125

But less than some. Why?


Craig
4K Photography Studio
[/URL]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,949 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13349
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
May 02, 2011 18:10 |  #126

cbknight wrote in post #12335152 (external link)
But less than some. Why?

So I can make you feel better about yourself :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cbknight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,767 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Texas
     
May 02, 2011 18:15 |  #127

airfrogusmc wrote in post #12335177 (external link)
So I can make you feel better about yourself :lol:

Now knowing you, I am the Man!!

Thanks for proving my case. Some are higher and some are lower. Exactly where I stand. You do it your way and I will do it mine. But the truth is obvious. We can't always be at the top. When you are, let me know. Till you show me where volume sales are proven to be not profitable, you have no case. You have a theory. An opinion. That's all.

Go to the pro forums. I'm sure the pro's here appreciated that.


Craig
4K Photography Studio
[/URL]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,949 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13349
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
May 02, 2011 18:23 |  #128

cbknight wrote in post #12335210 (external link)
Now knowing you, I am the Man!!

Thanks for proving my case. Some are higher and some are lower. Exactly where I stand. You do it your way and I will do it mine. But the truth is obvious. We can't always be at the top. When you are, let me know. Till you show me where volume sales are proven to be not profitable, you have no case. You have a theory. An opinion. That's all.

What are you reading? I never said volume wasn't profitable. I did say the smart guy was the guy that could do less volume and make more money. I guess after 25 years its not a theory. But thats worked for me and I've never said it was right or wrong for anyone else. What I did say was there are many photographers that have little or no value for what they create. That has not changed. I guess again its do you want to get hired for your price or what you create?

Yeah you're right no need for pros that have actually been doing it and doing it well for years or their experience and advise we got you here. LoL




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cbknight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,767 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Texas
     
May 02, 2011 18:28 |  #129

airfrogusmc wrote in post #12335267 (external link)
What are you reading? I never said volume wasn't profitable. I did say the smart guy was the guy that could do less volume and make more money. I guess after 25 years its not a theory. But thats worked for me and I've never said it was right or wrong for anyone else. What I did say was there are many photographers that have little or no value for what they create. That has not changed. I guess again its do you want to get hired for your price or what you create?

What are you reading? Already answered that question.


Craig
4K Photography Studio
[/URL]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cbknight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,767 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Texas
     
May 02, 2011 18:29 |  #130

Your not advising. Your belittling. So take it elsewhere.


Craig
4K Photography Studio
[/URL]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TopHatMoments
Goldmember
Avatar
1,173 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
May 02, 2011 18:30 |  #131

Whooooo weeeeee, talk about only having an opinion, that doesn't count.

Good thing some have RR income, or they couldn't pay there bills and the IRS, shesh.

One track mind often derails, what would the power plant do then.

2 years earlier asking the pros for help, now telling them there opinions don't count and where they can go or not go.


Canon to PhotoShop, “Beam me up”! LR3 set course for CS5, Warp speed 64!___ ((dpp___/==***^***

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,949 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13349
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
May 02, 2011 18:32 |  #132

cbknight wrote in post #12335289 (external link)
What are you reading? Already answered that question.

Only if you are someone that has little value for what they create. I guess with the defensive attitude that would be.......:lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
atlrus
Senior Member
Avatar
531 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Michigan
     
May 02, 2011 18:33 |  #133

I have, and nobody prints an 8x10 in my area for 2 bucks........not even Wal-Mart, they want $2.97 and the nearest Costco is 50 miles away and at the price of fuel, that is a waste of whatever the savings appears to be.

The fact is, once someone like yourself goes in offering to shoot for free, or at below cost rates, that then becomes the new standard that people expect.

For me, personally, to print 8x10 on a Pro Platinum using Pixma Pro9000 MII the cost is about $1 per sheet. So if I sell it for $2 - that's 100% on the supplies.

The OP is from Detroit, so good luck finding the "desperate housewives" that would spend $50 on a picture of their kid playing yet another weekend game. Maybe on a special occasion, but the guy is lucky to be selling week in and week out, lower prices or not.


Gear: Sold :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cbknight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,767 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Texas
     
May 02, 2011 18:45 |  #134

TopHatMoments wrote in post #12335298 (external link)
Whooooo weeeeee, talk about only having an opinion, that doesn't count.

Good thing some have RR income, or they couldn't pay there bills and the IRS, shesh.

One track mind often derails, what would the power plant do then.

2 years earlier asking the pros for help, now telling them there opinions don't count and where they can go or not go.

Still ask pro's for help. Just choosy which ones I listen to. As for RR income. Yes. I have plenty of it. 22 years worth and it's substantial. My choice. My life. Don't think I mentioned anything you said. But I can.


Craig
4K Photography Studio
[/URL]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bosscat
Goldmember
1,892 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Ontario Canada
     
May 02, 2011 18:47 |  #135

atlrus wrote in post #12335310 (external link)
The OP is from Detroit, so good luck finding the "desperate housewives" that would spend $50 on a picture of their kid playing yet another weekend game. Maybe on a special occasion, but the guy is lucky to be selling week in and week out, lower prices or not.

Didn't I and everyone else in North America have to help bail out the smart folks of Motown, when their beloved auto industry couldn't stay afloat due to bad business practices?


Your camera is alot smarter than the "M" Zealots would have you believe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

15,132 views & 0 likes for this thread, 30 members have posted to it.
Had a clueless guy accuse me of taking away his business
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1376 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.