Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 30 Apr 2011 (Saturday) 16:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Calibration Question

 
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
May 02, 2011 08:26 |  #16

huntersdad wrote in post #12329676 (external link)
...As I physically held the calibration monitor to the screen, I am pretty sure very, very little if any light got under it.

No no no... You must never hold the puck or apply any pressure to it. Use the counterweight on the cord to keep it positioned and tilt the screen back so gravity alone keeps the puck flush against the screen.

Your second calibration should be run immediately after the first run. Do not move the puck between the first run and the second attempt. And disable the ambient light function completely.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
May 02, 2011 08:49 |  #17

tzalman wrote in post #12331540 (external link)
No flame from this quarter Chas. In an interesting recent thread on the Luminous Landscape forum, started by Ethan Hanson who is testing calibration hardware for the Drycreek site's survey, he recommends leaving the puck lying on the screen for half an hour before running the calibration to warm it. There is even mention in the thread of wearing a black shirt to avoid light from the screen being reflected back to it. This seems a bit extreme, but a dark room would definitely be good.

I've been following that thread. Drycreek's calibrator rating hasn't been updated for years. It seems that the Spyder3 pucks are beginning to earn more respect.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/in​dex.php?topic=53825.0 (external link)

As for me, at home, I'm a tee shirt/sweat shirt kind of guy, so I typically am wearing a grey or black shirt as I sit in front of my monitor. I have a monitor hood and a matte black desk protector to minimize color reflection from my rich wood office furniture.

As far as warming up the puck... I used to warm the puck passively resting on the screen, but last year I heard a recommendation from someone to actively warm the puck by running an initial profiling, then do a second. The second run usually results in a better profile. (It works for ME)


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
czynot
Member
198 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
May 03, 2011 11:43 |  #18

Only way to calibrate your system ( I think) is to calibrate your monitor and your printer. Spyder will only calibrate the monitor to ambient light. It leave you guessing what your printer will show.
I own a munki. it calibrate the monitor and printer. It give great result. Nothing will give your 100% match because you are trying to match light output to ink output.


5D MKII, 24-70mm L, 18-55mm IS,70-200mm 2.8L IS, 50mm 1.8, 100mm Macro, 2-580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
May 03, 2011 12:23 |  #19

Leave your monitor on for a long time before calibrating and make sure it doesn't auto-off. The backlight takes a while to reach steady state and can lead to some really bad results.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,546 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Calibration Question
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2794 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.