When people talk about large size prints they also mention when the print is viewed at "normal viewing distance". Is there some general guideline? 3' for 16x24? 4' for 24x36? Less? More?
May 02, 2011 18:42 | #1 When people talk about large size prints they also mention when the print is viewed at "normal viewing distance". Is there some general guideline? 3' for 16x24? 4' for 24x36? Less? More? Website: Iowa Landscape Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tzalman Fatal attraction. 13,497 posts Likes: 213 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel More info | May 02, 2011 19:19 | #2 The rule I know, others may have different rules, is that viewing distance equals the diagonal of the print. So for 16x24 about 29 inches, call it 2.5 feet. And for 24x36, 3.5 feet. Elie / אלי
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | May 03, 2011 04:58 | #3 It also depends on the image IMO: A pano shot of a landscape, with lots of fine detail is more likely to be viewed from up close then a headshot. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 03, 2011 11:40 | #4 The definition even varies...one rule is "diagonal dimension of the print", another rule is "1.5 * diagonal dimension of the print", it just depends who you are talking to. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2809 guests, 161 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||