Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 03 May 2011 (Tuesday) 18:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need battery pack suggestions please!!!

 
S.E.V.
/Include subdirectories, empty directories, and verify.
Avatar
3,866 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Agoura Hills, CA
     
May 03, 2011 18:42 |  #1

Ok so I went with the advice of some on here and purchased the Yonguon or how ever its spelled from flashzebra.com. Now it worked great for a week or two and failed. I contacted Lon and the replaced it for me, the new one worked for the same amount of time as the first one did. I just noticed it took a dive like the first one, the light turns on, then shortly starts to flash then turns off. The recycle time on a 1/1 firing is about roughly 3 seconds on my 580ex II an then pack doesn't cut the time in half nor down a bit. Plus the pack stopped making the wining sound when it used to work. So I contacted Lon again and he agreed to return my money. Great customer service just got a bad string of the product no harsh feelings, just disappointed.

My question is what other battery packs will work better? The batteries I was using are the Sanyo Eneloops and I have about 20 of them. I tried the Shoot pack from ebay for $20.00 and that didn't work with the normal alkaline batteries but it did with the eneloops, go figure. They agreed to replace it as well. But I still need a pack that will work and for for more then the first weeks or so and I won't have to worry if it is gonna work when I go out shooting. Maybe I should just the canon pack or go all in on a quantum pack.

Any Suggestions?

Thanks in advance

Sevan ;)


ShotsInTime (external link) / Gear List /Flickr (external link) / Canon Family Portrait (external link)
- Don't Argue With A Stupid Person, They Will Bring You Down To Their Level And Beat You With Experience.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScatterCr
Senior Member
Avatar
384 posts
Likes: 4
Joined May 2010
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
May 03, 2011 21:45 |  #2

I have no experience with the Yongnuo battery packs, but have a friend that uses them all of the time. He swears by them. We get together a few times a year at Sporting Events. He shoots single shots & I shoot sequences. Just flat action lighting, maybe a Better Beamer, nothing fancy.

I have Canon & Pixel packs. I try to shoot close to ambient using the flash to help freeze motion as well as fill-in face shadows. I use fresh slow-charged PowerGenix NiZn batteries in the battery packs with only the pack refreshing my 580Ex II.

I have used the Canon CP-E4 with my 580EX II for over 4 years and it has never given me a hint of a problem. It will give me about 2-3 frames at around 6FPS (ISO 3200-6400, Manual, 1/640, f/2.8, ETTL) on my 1D4/70-200 before a skip... YMMV depending on distance & camera settings. I try not overheat the flash by overcycling it.

Last year I purchased a Pixel CP-E4. Its battery tray splits the batteries into two groups of four batteries. It has dual circuits that feed the flash, reducing the time that is required to refresh the flash (anyway, that was the sales pitch). It seems to get 3-5 frames before a skip... again, YMMV. The Pixel has not given me any problems either. Because of the split circuit design, battery life suffers. Also, in the event that one of the circuits fail, the other still works.

So far, I haven't had the guts to put PowerGenix batteries in the 580EX II & combine all of the batteries of the flash & battery pack. I would expect a slight improvement in performance. The electronics would probably handle it, but the flash tube might get a little warm.


Erik
Gear | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 03, 2011 21:53 |  #3

PixelHK if you want good, and cheap, I use two and they're fine. use Canon if you want the best but expensive.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.E.V.
THREAD ­ STARTER
/Include subdirectories, empty directories, and verify.
Avatar
3,866 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Agoura Hills, CA
     
May 03, 2011 22:08 |  #4

Thanks Guys, I just need something that will no crap out within the first two weeks. I wonder if the power from the Eneloops is too much from the pack and the flash? I may look into the PixelHK or maybe the canon next.


ShotsInTime (external link) / Gear List /Flickr (external link) / Canon Family Portrait (external link)
- Don't Argue With A Stupid Person, They Will Bring You Down To Their Level And Beat You With Experience.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 03, 2011 22:14 |  #5

It'll just be poor quality products. My PixelHK packs work fine, i've done a dozen weddings with them, but my first one was partially faulty. The recharge speed of one was slower than the other, so they replaced it. I got it from ebay.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
May 03, 2011 22:52 |  #6

I have 3 of the YNs and 5 of the Pixels. I had to return 3 Pixels for a variety of failures. One of the YNs lost part of the plug and became unusable.

Bottom line, the Chinese knockoffs have some QC issues but all in all they are very useful and much less expensive than the Canon alternative.

I quite sending the Pixel packs back to China when they failed. Just kept the trays for quick change.

The last two Pixels I purchased from Cheetah Stand to simplify exchange if there is a problem.

I like the Pixels a little more than the YNs. If I were going to buy anymore YNs I'd buy them from Lon.

I have 8 Speedlites that use the packs. They go all night long without a problem.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
klr.b
Goldmember
2,509 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: SoCal
     
May 03, 2011 23:30 |  #7

S.E.V. wrote in post #12343269 (external link)
Thanks Guys, I just need something that will no crap out within the first two weeks. I wonder if the power from the Eneloops is too much from the pack and the flash? I may look into the PixelHK or maybe the canon next.

I doubt it. Eneloops only have 1.2V. Alkalines have 1.5V and NiZn are 1.6V. Like others said, it's just poor QC. I use the Pixel TD-381 as well and never had any problems.


gordon
Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.E.V.
THREAD ­ STARTER
/Include subdirectories, empty directories, and verify.
Avatar
3,866 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Agoura Hills, CA
     
May 03, 2011 23:35 |  #8

dmward wrote in post #12343470 (external link)
I have 3 of the YNs and 5 of the Pixels. I had to return 3 Pixels for a variety of failures. One of the YNs lost part of the plug and became unusable.

Bottom line, the Chinese knockoffs have some QC issues but all in all they are very useful and much less expensive than the Canon alternative.

I quite sending the Pixel packs back to China when they failed. Just kept the trays for quick change.

The last two Pixels I purchased from Cheetah Stand to simplify exchange if there is a problem.

I like the Pixels a little more than the YNs. If I were going to buy anymore YNs I'd buy them from Lon.

I have 8 Speedlites that use the packs. They go all night long without a problem.

Believe me when my YN pack worked I was out shooting all damn day, but when you turn it on the next day and it doesn't work, you kind of question the reliability. I know knock offs are not going to be the best route but for the price you have to deal with the experimenting of which one is better then the others. But when you only take about 40 shots then it craps out, there is a bigger problem at hand.


ShotsInTime (external link) / Gear List /Flickr (external link) / Canon Family Portrait (external link)
- Don't Argue With A Stupid Person, They Will Bring You Down To Their Level And Beat You With Experience.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,911 posts
Likes: 140
Joined Jul 2007
Location: NE Ohio
     
May 04, 2011 13:08 |  #9

another vote for the Pixel packs. Got mine from CheetahStand as well and so far, so good. Does what it is supposed to and does it consistently.


Scott Evans Photography (external link)
SportsShooterProfile (external link) l MaxPreps Profile (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cwood
Senior Member
370 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2008
     
May 13, 2011 21:04 |  #10

I'm curious how hard you guys are using your packs.

I picked up a genuine Canon CP-E3 a while ago that appeared to be brand new. I used it at a couple of weddings and it was fine - but weddings are not too hard on flashes. Then I took it to a race I was shooting and it died. I was doing event style shooting so I was using it pretty hard but I try to take it easy on my gear so I had a 430exII that I would mount every 15 minutes or so and use it for a few minutes to let the other system cool down a bit. At some point during the day (I don't know when) the pack stopped working.

Of course it was outside the 12 month warranty window so Canon told me to take a hike (no repairs on these packs).

Is anyone else using one any of their packs really hard? Like 4000 pictures in 4 hours? If the Canon packs are ACTUALLY more reliable then I don't mind spending money on them... but if they all suck and they're probably going to die anyway then I'm going to buy the cheap one.


1DxII, 5D3, 6D
BLOG (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tetrode
I am a walking repository of thoroughly useless information
Avatar
3,777 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2006
Location: New York
     
May 13, 2011 21:19 as a reply to  @ cwood's post |  #11

Since the OP mentioned the "Q" word, I'll offer that up as an alternative. I *hate* keeping track of and recharging piles of AA batteries. I have both Pixel and Yongnuo packs for my Nikon and Canon flashes and none has ever given me any problem. However, the packs take 8 AA batteries each and that I find a nuisance. Soooooooooo, when weight isn't an issue, I'll reach for the old Quantum Turbo every time. Used Turbos are cheap as are replacement SLA batteries. The packs are bulletproof and capacity is mammoth. I just added a Quantum Turbo SC to the battery family. It's small and light and also has huge capacity. However, even at eBay prices, it wasn't cheap.

Pixel for an 8 AA-powered, generally reliable pack. Quantum Turbo when weight and bulk are secondary considerations to absolute reliability. Quantum Turbo SC for extreme reliability and portability at a price.

Dave F.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 13, 2011 22:15 |  #12

cwood wrote in post #12405822 (external link)
I'm curious how hard you guys are using your packs.

I picked up a genuine Canon CP-E3 a while ago that appeared to be brand new. I used it at a couple of weddings and it was fine - but weddings are not too hard on flashes. Then I took it to a race I was shooting and it died. I was doing event style shooting so I was using it pretty hard but I try to take it easy on my gear so I had a 430exII that I would mount every 15 minutes or so and use it for a few minutes to let the other system cool down a bit. At some point during the day (I don't know when) the pack stopped working.

Of course it was outside the 12 month warranty window so Canon told me to take a hike (no repairs on these packs).

Is anyone else using one any of their packs really hard? Like 4000 pictures in 4 hours? If the Canon packs are ACTUALLY more reliable then I don't mind spending money on them... but if they all suck and they're probably going to die anyway then I'm going to buy the cheap one.

I've never used it that hard, but i'll do 400 1/4 power flashes in an hour sometimes. The Canon and PixelHK packs have been reliable for me. The packs are simple, unless you burn them out somehow not sure how you could damage them. I have a CP-E3 and CP-E4 that are a few years old each and still work fine.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cwood
Senior Member
370 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2008
     
May 14, 2011 00:24 |  #13

tim wrote in post #12406165 (external link)
I've never used it that hard, but i'll do 400 1/4 power flashes in an hour sometimes. The Canon and PixelHK packs have been reliable for me. The packs are simple, unless you burn them out somehow not sure how you could damage them. I have a CP-E3 and CP-E4 that are a few years old each and still work fine.

Thanks for the feedback. I'm not sure how it would get burned out either. After Canon told me there were "no serviceable parts" I opened it up to find a few serviceable parts - so if something is "burned" it seems to me it should be replaceable... but if nobody is willing to do it then I guess its just garbage now.

My CP-E3 has similar symptoms to what someone else in this thread described with a 3rd party pack. The light comes on but now there is no noise coming from the pack, no improvement in recycle time, and no power drain on the packs batteries.

I'm a huge fan of the size and weight of these packs... and the AA batteries since I sometimes work in remote locations and I don't have access to chargers... but I'm hoping I don't keep burning through them.


1DxII, 5D3, 6D
BLOG (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 14, 2011 05:51 |  #14

Things are so cheap and peoples time is so expensive it's not worth the time to diagnose which individual components burned out and repair them. That'd cost way more than buying a new one.

If you need to do 4000 shots in 4 hours you should consider an industrial strength unit, like a Quantum.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
May 14, 2011 09:59 |  #15

I would say 1000 flashes an hour, the flash unit would be the week link. Even at reduced power that's a lot of heat. It would also require several battery changes I suspect. My guess is the circuitry in the pack would tend to overheat as well under those conditions. There is a transformer in the pack to get the high voltage and they generate heat.

That kind of workload, a shot every 3.75 seconds on average seems well beyond what the 580EX and pack are intended for.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,754 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Need battery pack suggestions please!!!
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2908 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.