Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 04 May 2011 (Wednesday) 06:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

85mm vs 100mm on FF

 
raavi
Member
169 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
     
May 04, 2011 06:55 |  #1

I really don't know which focal length to pick for portrait photography esp., in concerts, party halls and marriages.

I am very keen in shooting concerts...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smorter
Goldmember
Avatar
4,506 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
May 04, 2011 06:57 |  #2

The difference is pretty small...

Better to compare on a lens by lens basis

Or better yet get a 70-200 f/2.8L II IS as long as it is fast enough


Wedding Photography Melbourneexternal link
Reviews: 85LII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WhyFi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,774 posts
Gallery: 246 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 845
Joined Apr 2008
Location: I got a castle in Brooklyn, that's where I dwell.
     
May 04, 2011 07:02 |  #3

Do you have a telephoto zoom that covers both? Check the differences yourself and see if it makes a difference. For me, I don't find that there's that much of a difference between the two focal lengths. I think that, in your position, it would come down to comparing specific lenses as opposed to the two focal lengths.


Bill is my name - I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
raavi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
169 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
     
May 04, 2011 07:07 |  #4

smorter wrote in post #12344740 (external link)
The difference is pretty small...

Better to compare on a lens by lens basis

Or better yet get a 70-200 f/2.8L II IS as long as it is fast enough

I shoot mostly film and I prefer EF primes for that matter. Grains on print esp., in low-lights is amazing.

I think, I will go with 100mm and fast film.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
raavi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
169 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
     
May 04, 2011 07:10 |  #5

WhyFi wrote in post #12344759 (external link)
Do you have a telephoto zoom that covers both? Check the differences yourself and see if it makes a difference. For me, I don't find that there's that much of a difference between the two focal lengths. I think that, in your position, it would come down to comparing specific lenses as opposed to the two focal lengths.

Other factors such as sharpness, does not play a bit role with low-light photography. Since, you need to bump the ISO or usage fast-films results in noise or grains. Grains are kind of cool...

I only think about the shutter speed. I will be very happy if I get 1/60 or above.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
May 04, 2011 09:08 as a reply to  @ raavi's post |  #6

Which maximum f-stop 85mm and 100mm are you thinking of buying?


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
raavi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
169 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
     
May 04, 2011 09:16 |  #7

yogestee wrote in post #12345287 (external link)
Which maximum f-stop 85mm and 100mm are you thinking of buying?

If it is canon then EF 85mm F1.8 or EF 100mm F2.0. I discovered sharpness play a least role in low-light black-and-white photography.

EF 85mm F1.2 is too expensive for me.

I have both analog(Euro 35) and digital SLRs from Canan and both takes EF lenses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
plasticmotif
Goldmember
Avatar
3,174 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Tennessee
     
May 04, 2011 09:28 |  #8

Either are fine. It largely depends on your other focal length....at least it does to me. I've got lenses from 21-70, so 85 is a bit close for me.


Mac P.
My Zenfolio (external link) My Photo Blog (external link) My Equipment
https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=14172975#po​st14172975

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
May 04, 2011 09:35 as a reply to  @ plasticmotif's post |  #9

Either are fine lenses and very similar.


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
raavi
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
169 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
     
May 04, 2011 09:54 |  #10

Almost my head explodes with curiosity, how the prints will look like when shot with high-speed film.

Here I attach one with EF 50mm F1.4 shot with film speed ISO 3200.

yogestee wrote in post #12345440 (external link)
Either are fine lenses and very similar.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,046 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
85mm vs 100mm on FF
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1135 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.