I really don't know which focal length to pick for portrait photography esp., in concerts, party halls and marriages.
I am very keen in shooting concerts...
raavi Member 169 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Germany More info | May 04, 2011 06:55 | #1 I really don't know which focal length to pick for portrait photography esp., in concerts, party halls and marriages.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smorter Goldmember 4,506 posts Likes: 19 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | May 04, 2011 06:57 | #2 The difference is pretty small... Wedding Photography Melbourne
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WhyFi Goldmember 2,774 posts Gallery: 246 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 845 Joined Apr 2008 Location: I got a castle in Brooklyn, that's where I dwell. More info | May 04, 2011 07:02 | #3 Do you have a telephoto zoom that covers both? Check the differences yourself and see if it makes a difference. For me, I don't find that there's that much of a difference between the two focal lengths. I think that, in your position, it would come down to comparing specific lenses as opposed to the two focal lengths. Bill is my name - I'm the most wanted man on my island, except I'm not on my island, of course. More's the pity.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2011 07:07 | #4 smorter wrote in post #12344740 The difference is pretty small... Better to compare on a lens by lens basis Or better yet get a 70-200 f/2.8L II IS as long as it is fast enough I shoot mostly film and I prefer EF primes for that matter. Grains on print esp., in low-lights is amazing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2011 07:10 | #5 WhyFi wrote in post #12344759 Do you have a telephoto zoom that covers both? Check the differences yourself and see if it makes a difference. For me, I don't find that there's that much of a difference between the two focal lengths. I think that, in your position, it would come down to comparing specific lenses as opposed to the two focal lengths. Other factors such as sharpness, does not play a bit role with low-light photography. Since, you need to bump the ISO or usage fast-films results in noise or grains. Grains are kind of cool...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful" More info | Which maximum f-stop 85mm and 100mm are you thinking of buying? Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2011 09:16 | #7 yogestee wrote in post #12345287 Which maximum f-stop 85mm and 100mm are you thinking of buying? If it is canon then EF 85mm F1.8 or EF 100mm F2.0. I discovered sharpness play a least role in low-light black-and-white photography.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
plasticmotif Goldmember 3,174 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Tennessee More info | May 04, 2011 09:28 | #8 Either are fine. It largely depends on your other focal length....at least it does to me. I've got lenses from 21-70, so 85 is a bit close for me. Mac P.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful" More info | Either are fine lenses and very similar. Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2011 09:54 | #10 Almost my head explodes with curiosity, how the prints will look like when shot with high-speed film. yogestee wrote in post #12345440 Either are fine lenses and very similar.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1135 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||