Anyways.. I was bored.. and your original post processing was a bit different than how I would've done it.. so here's my version.
airshaq20 Senior Member 667 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: East Coast, USA More info | May 04, 2011 12:48 | #17 I have this same problem.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shankarhokie Goldmember 1,894 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Saline, Michigan More info | What I do is to shoot in RAW and apply flash WB in DPP and that seems to do it. I tehn quickly compare side by side with some of Rob's (TMRDESIGN), or other images that seemt o have good skin tone, and make small tweaks. However, I once in a while get "the skin looks orange/pink" comment from some and "skin looks great" from others. It also depends on the viewer's monitors! Shankar
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2011 14:17 | #19 BrandonSi wrote in post #12346590 Anyways.. I was bored.. and your original post processing was a bit different than how I would've done it.. so here's my version. See this is what I was trying to go for in PP, even if the pose isnt right or what not, was just trying to test the color's. The PP came out very orangy for me once I exported, but looks lighter in LR. 5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 100-400L II | 24-105L | 50MM f/1.4 | 85MM f/1.8 | Sigma 1.4x TC | 580EX II | 430EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
One quick question though: 5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 100-400L II | 24-105L | 50MM f/1.4 | 85MM f/1.8 | Sigma 1.4x TC | 580EX II | 430EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | May 04, 2011 14:27 | #21 fiveohmike wrote in post #12347257 One quick question though: both my bodies are set to AdobeRGB. Lightroom, according to to Adobe, is previewing pictures in AdobeRGB space. Then I export them into sRGB. I am wondering if losing the colors going from AdobeRGB to sRGB is causing the orange tint. I will have to test this. The color tables don't align all that well. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Well here is the results.
AdobeRGB
5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 100-400L II | 24-105L | 50MM f/1.4 | 85MM f/1.8 | Sigma 1.4x TC | 580EX II | 430EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | Both have a very odd skin tone. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2011 15:08 | #24 TMR Design wrote in post #12347473 Both have a very odd skin tone. The first pic you posted, aside from being a little overexposed and lacking some contrast, had the best skin tone on screen. I have tried to play around with it, but the tone is still definintly wierd. I used a grey card to set a nuetral white balance, but it still comes out pretty weird. 5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 100-400L II | 24-105L | 50MM f/1.4 | 85MM f/1.8 | Sigma 1.4x TC | 580EX II | 430EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The only other thing I can think of for the skin tone, is the ambiet room light is one of those CFL's that has a natural orange cast to it in the room anyways. 5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 100-400L II | 24-105L | 50MM f/1.4 | 85MM f/1.8 | Sigma 1.4x TC | 580EX II | 430EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | May 04, 2011 15:22 | #26 fiveohmike wrote in post #12347542 The only other thing I can think of for the skin tone, is the ambiet room light is one of those CFL's that has a natural orange cast to it in the room anyways. Maybe its the combination of flash+ambient cfl. Unless that light source is right next to your subject or it's a few hundred watts, it shouldn't be contributing, and that's not what it looks like, but again, do the tests on thee variables to make sure you've covered all bases. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
anlenke Senior Member 575 posts Joined Mar 2011 More info |
May 04, 2011 15:34 | #28 anlenke wrote in post #12347650 Does the L-308s have the ability to tell you how much of the exposure is ambient/flash like the L-358? It does not, but I can take separate ambient readings at the subject if needed. 5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 100-400L II | 24-105L | 50MM f/1.4 | 85MM f/1.8 | Sigma 1.4x TC | 580EX II | 430EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2011 15:35 | #29 TMR Design wrote in post #12347612 Unless that light source is right next to your subject or it's a few hundred watts, it shouldn't be contributing, and that's not what it looks like, but again, do the tests on thee variables to make sure you've covered all bases. I would say the light source was 8ft from the subject, camera right/rear 5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 100-400L II | 24-105L | 50MM f/1.4 | 85MM f/1.8 | Sigma 1.4x TC | 580EX II | 430EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2674 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||