Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 May 2011 (Wednesday) 12:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I am screwed

 
Nickc84
Goldmember
Avatar
2,064 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Jul 2010
     
May 04, 2011 12:08 |  #1

I have been cropping on CS5 in raw edit and the actual cs5 because I thought they were the same and now when uploading to Mpix some shots are slightly cut off on the sides. What do I do!!!!!!! I process most of my images in cs5 so if I go back raw edit I will have to do %50 of everything over.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
May 04, 2011 12:33 |  #2

Nickc84 wrote in post #12346400 (external link)
I have been cropping on CS5 in raw edit and the actual cs5 because I thought they were the same and now when uploading to Mpix some shots are slightly cut off on the sides. What do I do!!!!!!! I process most of my images in cs5 so if I go back raw edit I will have to do %50 of everything over.

First I would want to know why Mpix is cropping your photos again.

For those that you have already done there isn't much you can do other than start over again.

Other than that, if you're using multiple layers don't merge or flatten them. Go to File / "Save" and save your work as a PSD file. Then you can re-open the file and resume where you left off.

If you use ACR and don't need to take it into CS5 you can select Done and it will update your RAW file with a sidecar. Then you can export the file to jpeg and still have your raw with the changes you did in ACR. If you don't want to keep those changes then just select Camera Raw Defaults.


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
May 04, 2011 13:15 |  #3

What is your crop? That is, are you cropping to specific dimensions and print resolution, or are your crops non-constrained and freeform?

Perhaps MPIX is cropping to the specified output aspect ratio, which may be different than your crop. Also, labs may crop a very small portion of the correctly sized image in the printing process.

From MPIX:

Exact Sizing
Digital printers have what is called over sizing. Over sizing is a process in which the image being developed onto the photo paper is magnified by a certain percentage to counteract paper shift within the printer. Photographic paper is loaded into the printers in rolls. As the paper travels from the roll through the machine it can drift up to 1/8 of an inch by the time it reaches the lasers that expose the paper with the image. No amount of calibration on the paper path can prevent this drift. A 1/8 of an inch is about half the radius of the pen or pencil on your desk. The over sizing that is applied to each image runs between 1.5% -1.7%; we generally quote the percentage at 2% for a round number to work with. How can you use this information? Well the over sizing is so minimal, that 99% of your orders will not be effected by it. However, in certain instances where you may have images butted up against the outer edge like in a collage, text, or a pin stripe around an image's perimeter, you will want to take this 2% value into consideration. In most cases you can do very simple math to calculate the expected over sizing. Our message is to add the 2% additional space to the perimeter of any potentially affected image. For regular prints, such as an 8x10, the additional leeway you need to provide is 1/16 of an inch in the 8-inch dimension and 1/5 of an inch in the 10-inch dimension. Of course, the larger the print dimensions, the more image space effected by over sizing, thus the more padding that is needed.

link: http://www.mpix.com …/Help.aspx?id=3​#anchor_17 (external link)

Details?

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nickc84
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,064 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Jul 2010
     
May 04, 2011 15:54 as a reply to  @ kirkt's post |  #4

the 2/3 crop from raw editor fits perfect on mpix but the 2/3 crop from the cs5 editor cuts some if it out? How is that possible if its the same crop?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
May 04, 2011 17:15 |  #5

Nickc84 wrote in post #12347813 (external link)
the 2/3 crop from raw editor fits perfect on mpix but the 2/3 crop from the cs5 editor cuts some if it out? How is that possible if its the same crop?

Your original Raw image is very large. Even if you crop an image you usually still have to resize for certain applications or web sites..

How are you cropping with CS5?
Are you just freely cropping, or cropping to a specific aspect ratio either Inches, or pixels?
Once you crop are you resizing the image again to reduce the size even more?

Set your width and height aspect ratio(size) in either pixels or inches. Then you can crop what you want from the original picture and not worry about resizing again.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nickc84
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,064 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Jul 2010
     
May 04, 2011 17:47 |  #6

tkerr wrote in post #12348231 (external link)
Your original Raw image is very large. Even if you crop an image you usually still have to resize for certain applications or web sites..

How are you cropping with CS5?
Are you just freely cropping, or cropping to a specific aspect ratio either Inches, or pixels?
Once you crop are you resizing the image again to reduce the size even more?

Set your width and height aspect ratio(size) in either pixels or inches. Then you can crop what you want from the original picture and not worry about resizing again.

I am cropping in cs5 with a two thirds ratio but I was mixing it up with the two thirds ratio in raw editor as well because I thought it was the same. Now all the pics I cropped on Cs5 itself are not a prefect fit for prints ...only the ones I cropped in raw editor fit. After I crop I change the DPI to 300 and resample.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
May 04, 2011 17:56 |  #7

Nickc84 wrote in post #12348384 (external link)
I am cropping in cs5 with a two thirds ratio but I was mixing it up with the two thirds ratio in raw editor as well because I thought it was the same. Now all the pics I cropped on Cs5 itself are not a prefect fit for prints ...only the ones I cropped in raw editor fit. After I crop I change the DPI to 300 and resample.

How are you determining 2/3 ratio? Do you mean 2 to 3 using ACR? That's not two thirds ratio. That is a ratio of 2 by 3.

Instead of changing the resolution, and then resampling after you crop, maybe you should do that first.

Or you can predetermine the aspect ratio as well as the resolution that you crop.

For example if I want to crop my picture for a 4" x 6" 300 ppi print, I can preset it, and then however much I crop out of the original image it will maintain those dimensions which works for a standard 4x6 inch print.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 04, 2011 18:01 |  #8

I think this is a PEBKAC class problem, and I think you need to explain yourself and your problem more carefully, maybe post screenshots of you doing the crops.

The crop tool works properly in both ACR and Photoshop. In ACR you're just changing your view of the image, in Photoshop you're throwing away pixels.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 04, 2011 18:20 |  #9

Yeah Nick, post a screen shot, at least with the setup for the crop tool tkerr shows in post #7/


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
May 05, 2011 08:37 |  #10

http://en.wikipedia.or​g/wiki/User_error (external link)

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nickc84
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,064 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Jul 2010
     
May 05, 2011 08:59 |  #11

sorry, not very funny. I figured out if I just crop in raw editor its fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
May 05, 2011 09:11 |  #12

I put the definition there because of Tim's post - I had no idea what PEBKAC meant.

So was the problem with Photoshop/ACR?

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
May 05, 2011 09:34 |  #13

Nickc84 wrote in post #12351726 (external link)
sorry, not very funny. I figured out if I just crop in raw editor its fine.

By "Raw Editor" can we assume you are referring to (ACR)Adobe Camera Raw? Or are you using something else?


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
May 05, 2011 10:21 |  #14

Looking back to the original post I've come to think we are not reading from the same book or there is some sort of language barrier..

Nickc84 wrote in post #12346400 (external link)
I have been cropping on CS5 in raw edit and the actual cs5 because I thought they were the same .

How much experience and knowledge of Photoshop do you have?
What kind of work flow are you using? E.g. From Camera to computer to Adobe Bridge to Camera Raw to CS5 and then Save.

I can only Assume by that comment you are opening your Raw files into ACR and then into CS5. And you thought they were the same but no you think they are not. Is that correct?

ACR is a plugin that works with CS5 as Well as Adobe Bridge. It is an image editor that is also used to open Raw files into CS5. Any changes you make to your images in ACR will follow into CS5.

Any Changes you made to your RAW files are not actually applied to the Raw file itself, but are instead embedded into a sidecar file. If you just close a RAW file when done in ACR the changes are lost. If instead you choose to Open Image it will save the sidecar and then open the image file into CS5 with those changes.
If on the other hand you just select Done, you're edits and correction are just embedded into the Sidecar file that will be saved as a separate file along side the original Raw image file. Anytime you re-open that Raw file into ACR it will read that sidecar file and apply those changes. None of the changes are permanent unless you export/save it as a different file type, i.e. tiff, jpeg, psd, etc.
Now, If you open that Raw image again to make changes again, any changes made will be written to a new sidecar file that will overwrite the previous.

So if you did it right, the sidecar file should still be there for each raw image file. When you open them into ACR again you shouldn't have to do everything over again.
Look in the directory/folder where you are storing your Raw image files. If you see a .xmp file next to each of the Raw files you opened into ACR and made any changes too, you changes are safe.


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 05, 2011 12:10 |  #15

Nickc84 wrote in post #12351726 (external link)
sorry, not very funny. I figured out if I just crop in raw editor its fine.

But we still don't understand what your problem in the Photoshop editor is. If you do like we ask and post a screen shot of your crop settings we may be able to easily spot the problem.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,351 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
I am screwed
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2882 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.