Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 05 May 2011 (Thursday) 16:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Confusing WB issue w/ pics

 
MobyDick
Member
Avatar
106 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
May 05, 2011 16:25 |  #1

I was messing about in the kitchen taking some photos of the dogs (as you do :oops: ).

None of the default WB modes or Auto looked good under the lighting so I shot a custom wb using the fridge door, just trying it as I never used one before.

So I set the WB to custom, snapped away some shots and the WB was different in the pictures. These two were taken about a second apart according to the exif. Both in manual, 1/200 f2.5 ISO1600. Anybody know what's going on?

I know a fridge door isn't a gray card but it should be pretty consistent shouldn't it??

Excuse the bad shots,they weren't keepers... :lol:

IMAGE: http://homepage.eircom.net/~niabutdsl/Boards/WB%20Pug-15.jpg

IMAGE: http://homepage.eircom.net/~niabutdsl/Boards/WB%20Pug-14.jpg

My Flickr (external link) ----- I Am Paul - Photoblog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tracknut
Goldmember
Avatar
1,740 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Folsom, California
     
May 05, 2011 16:47 |  #2

This is due to the fluorescent lights in your kitchen. They "cycle" and generate a different color periodically. Not a whole lot you can do about it, and it's not something you did wrong with the white balance setting. If you were to use a longer shutter speed, you could minimize the effect, but that won't work if you're shooting a dog. So you just need to know under fluorescent lights to shoot a few extra shots to make sure you got the "good" lighting. Actually you also need to double check when you shoot your custom white balance shot that you don't get this periodic dark one as that shot either. That would screw up the majority of your shots.

You could also shoot these in raw, then adjust the white balance later, accounting for the periodic oddball-colored one.

Dave


Performance/sport dog photographer (external link)
Facebook (external link)
"Always available to shoot your dog"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MobyDick
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
106 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
May 05, 2011 16:51 |  #3

I was thinking it might be the lights for a second. I shot raw anyway but i like to the the WB at least close in camera. I'll have to try shoot them earlier in the day when there's some sunlight :D Thanks for the reply.


My Flickr (external link) ----- I Am Paul - Photoblog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
May 05, 2011 17:47 |  #4

MobyDick wrote in post #12354303 (external link)
I was thinking it might be the lights for a second. I shot raw anyway but i like to the the WB at least close in camera. I'll have to try shoot them earlier in the day when there's some sunlight :D Thanks for the reply.

The issue with fluorescent lighting is one which is very difficult to overcome. If you are trying to use fluorescent lighting that cycles at the power line frequency, then the ONLY solution is to shoot with some very specific shutter speeds that will allow the frame to be exposed to one or more full half-cycles of the power. This is the only way to get uniform color and brightness across the whole frame of the image.

For places using 60 Hz power, the ideas shutter speeds would be 1/120, 1/60, 1/30 and 1/15 second.

For places using 50 Hz power, the ideal shutter speeds would be 1/100, 1/50, and 1/25 second.

Mixing light types is not the solution unless you can totally overpower the fluorescent lights with daylight or flash, for example.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
May 05, 2011 23:38 |  #5

SkipD wrote in post #12354565 (external link)
The issue with fluorescent lighting is one which is very difficult to overcome. If you are trying to use fluorescent lighting that cycles at the power line frequency, then the ONLY solution is to shoot with some very specific shutter speeds that will allow the frame to be exposed to one or more full half-cycles of the power. This is the only way to get uniform color and brightness across the whole frame of the image.

For places using 60 Hz power, the ideas shutter speeds would be 1/120, 1/60, 1/30 and 1/15 second.

For places using 50 Hz power, the ideal shutter speeds would be 1/100, 1/50, and 1/25 second.

Mixing light types is not the solution unless you can totally overpower the fluorescent lights with daylight or flash, for example.

That is true for situations where the fluorescent lighting still uses simple magnetic ballasts. However, they are gradually disappearing and being replaced by electronic ballasts which are much more efficient and result in more lumens per watt. The output from the electronic ballasts is a square wave with a frequency of several thousand Hertz. You can't depend on the output being any particular frequency since it varies with factors such as lamp type and who manufactures the ballasts.

The worst situation imaginable is to have lighting that is a mixture of fluorescent and something else, especially if the "something else" is tungsten because the color content of their outputs are so drastically different. This means that the shadows of each of the light sources will have a different color. With fluorescent lighting, the shadows are a sickly greenish brown when used together with flash or tungsten lights to illuminate the same subject.

The best possible solution is to turn off the fluorescent lights.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gameface
Senior Member
Avatar
672 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Boston
     
May 05, 2011 23:49 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

For custom you want to shoot the white fridge, defocused. THEN when you select custom you navigate to the picture and select it and it will set the custom WB based off that picture you used. Always defocus slightly when shooting a card or wall for WB.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,744 posts
Gallery: 1929 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10197
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
     
May 06, 2011 12:06 |  #7

Custom WB won't work terribly well with fluorescent lighting if your shutterspeed is too fast, and/or catching the cycling. There can be times where half the image is of one color, the other half a different color.

And during other times where the WB is off, it may be difficult/impossible to fully correct because at that time, the only light output is in that particular spectrum.

The best you can do (nowadays) is to shoot with a slower shutter speed, or bring your own light (flash) if you want more consistent results.


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | Instagram (external link) | YouTube (external link)
My Reviews | "The Mighty One" (external link) | "EF 85mm f/1.4 L IS Review" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,045 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Confusing WB issue w/ pics
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1146 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.