Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 06 May 2011 (Friday) 20:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

This effect

 
Bentapp2
Member
205 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 06, 2011 20:27 |  #1

Hey ya'll, I've been messing around in LR/PS trying to get this effect going. You'd see it a lot in Jeff Newsom's ( www.voltronofawesomene​ss.com (external link) ) or hugh forte's work ( http://hughforte.com/b​log/ (external link) ) It's not totally hazy, a little flat. It just gives a real sexy look to the images. Any help would be appreciated, thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
May 06, 2011 22:24 |  #2

Seriously, I think the first link has shots using a Lensbaby. When trees equidistant from the camera show one in focus and the other not, there is a lot of either fake blur being added/Lensbaby/TS. On second look, he is adding selective blurring in post.

As far as exposure, both seem to like to slightly overexpose images.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bentapp2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
205 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 08, 2011 20:35 |  #3

The blur is a tilt shift lens, i was interested more in the PP




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
May 08, 2011 20:43 |  #4

Just looks like they've dropped the contrast way down, to me; maybe some slight desaturation


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HastyPhoto
Senior Member
Avatar
953 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Philly Burbs
     
May 09, 2011 21:17 |  #5

The blur is one thing, but I think what your possibly liking is that #1 it's great photography, but #2 - they both seem to have that "washed out look" alot of people are doing now. Although in your links both of them photographers are useing it a very little bit, not overly done. You can find an action here although in the example image they are a bit overdone.

> http://waterspirirtjes​s.deviantart.com …tion-Washed-out-114233686 (external link)

Another thing you can do is the old retro action here >

http://waterspirirtjes​s.deviantart.com …ld-Retro-Action-111571044 (external link)

Or last but not least, do it yourself by slightly desaturating your image via a layer, then duplicate your original backround layer, fill with white, and lower the opacity down to above 5 or 10 or around there somewhere. Have fun!


60D | EFS 17-55 2.8 IS | Rode VideoMic Pro | Manfrotto 190XPROB

www.HastyPhoto.com (external link)
www.etsy.com/shop/Hast​yPhoto (external link)
www.facebook.com/HastyPhoto (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bentapp2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
205 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 09, 2011 21:34 |  #6

Ya, I know how to do retro, and I know they amazing technically excellent photographer. not totally what I was looking for though. I also know that they do that In LR




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frenchconnector
Member
Avatar
224 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: London/Minneapolis
     
May 10, 2011 04:54 |  #7

Which images are you specifically interested in, they both have quite a few photographs out there and they dont all look the same. But the hazy ones, that I think you maybe mean, look the way they do because they are shot into the sun and/or have sun's flare on the lens.


igorpilot.com (external link)flickr (external link)tweet tweet (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
May 10, 2011 08:37 |  #8

It looks like you are interested in trying to emulate the tonal qualities of, heaven forbid, film. THere are several different tools out there that emulate or apply the tonal response curves of various film stock. Give that a shot.

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edge100
Goldmember
1,920 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
May 10, 2011 13:14 |  #9

Three keys to this type of image:

1. Split toning. You need to warm the highlights and add some blue to the shadows. Don't overdo it.
2. Lower contrast by moving the black point up into the greys. Again, don't overdo it.
3. Add grain to taste.

Obviously there is more to it than just this, but this approach will get you in the ballpark. What you're really looking to create is a very film-like atmosphere (there are a few presets in AlienSkin Exposure 3 that get close, too). Sergio Mottola (external link) does this look better than anyone, IMHO.

If you look at Hugo or Sergio's work, also note that they often use very shallow DoF, even when 'traditional' thinking would dictate larger DoF.

My take on the style:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Street and editorial photography in Toronto, Canada (external link)
Mirrorless: Fujifilm X-Pro1
Film: Leica MP | Leica M2 | CV Nokton 35/1.4 | CV Nokton 40 f/1.4 | Leitz Summitar 50 f/2 | Canon 50 f/1.2 LTM | Mamiya 7 | Mamiya 80 f/4.0 | Mamiya 150 f/4.5 | Mamiya 43 f/4.5
How to get good colour from C-41 film scans (external link)

Digitizing film with a digital camera (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,043 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
This effect
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2768 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.