Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 May 2011 (Saturday) 15:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Saving as Tiff file size

 
aimson
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined May 2011
     
May 07, 2011 15:26 |  #1

Hi,

I'm new to this forum and have a question I can't find the answer to on the net.
I'm shooting with a 550d in RAW giving me a typical file size of around 20mb. I've just finished processing one of these images in CS5 and saved it as a Tiff. When I checked on the file size in explorer, it's now 206mb!

I've compressed the file to Tiff ZIP in the save option box which appears but that still leaves it at 100mb! I've been saving all my files as Tiffs over the last few months but can't afford the HDD space at this rate.

I've been told to save files as Tiff's in case you ever want to come back and do more editing a few months down the line. If you save as JPEG, you'll lose a lot of quality?

Can anyone offer some advice as to how I can keep an edited file size to an equal or lesser size than the original RAW?

Thanks in advance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 07, 2011 15:53 |  #2

Well, yes, this is the issue with the tiff format as well as the Adobe psd format -- huge file sizes, especially once you do editing in Photoshop that involves layers.

Fortunately, as technology grows and pumps out these devices with higher digital resolution, hard disk drives "grow" in order to accomodate this. So, digital photogs are driven to update our hard drive space to keep up. Fortunately, hard drive space has become much less expensive over the years. So, it's common to have not just a hefty internal "data drive" but also use at least one external drive along with the needed external backup drive. Drive sizes of at least 1 TB are getting pretty normal these days.

And then, you still want a workflow that is efficient. I myself do most of my processing in the Raw processor and don't use the Photoshop editor for an image unless I really need to. This suits the photography I do just fine, and I don't end up with all these tiffs scattered in my library. I use my Raw processor to export for the Web and, if needed, for an external printer, all of which is done using jpegs which can be archived on an external drive or even discarded since the Raw processor keeps all the editing data.

As to when you do need Photoshop, yeah, it has for years been considered "best practice" to have a 16 bit "project file" for meaningful edits that you will want to revisit, for the reason you mentioned. Whether this is always necessary is a workflow choice that you have to make. If you are really "finished" with the image, well, maybe not. If you have only "light" touchups that you will do in the future, or special things like sharpening or applied filters or other things that won't benefit from the 16 bit file, then, 8 bits can certainly cut down on the file size. It's up to you.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
May 07, 2011 15:59 |  #3

The 550D is 18 MP.
A 16 bit tif has 48 bits in each pixel (16 x 3 color channels).
48 bits = 6 bytes.
18 million x 6 bytes = 103 MB, which is the size an uncompressed 16 bit tif will be if it has a single layer. Every time you add another layer you increase the size of the file. So to reduce file size you have to flatten before saving to bring it back to 103 MB, convert to 8 bit to reduce it to 51.5 MB, compress it with zip or LZW compression or save it as a compressed jpg.
TANSTAAFL


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aimson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined May 2011
     
May 07, 2011 17:13 |  #4

Thanks guys. I've just had a look through the save options and can't see how I would compress from 16 bit to 8 bit. I'm not really clued up on this but as I understand, my RAW is 8 bit, when I save as Tiff that increases to 16 bit? This increase obviously causes the file size to increase.

How do I flatten the layers? Once this is done, can you still access them. The reason I ask is because I place my signature on all the photographs I edit. I put this on a separate layer (which is only slightly bigger than the signature itself) so I can remove it easily if I need to print.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
May 07, 2011 17:33 |  #5

No, actually the RAW is 14 bits x 1 channel. Moving to PS the rendered RGB image is a 16 bit bitmap which can at any time be converted to 8 bit. Somebody more familiar with PSCS can tell you where to find that function. Flattening the image before saving it is not reversible.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 07, 2011 18:19 |  #6

In the PS editor you can convert to 8 bits in the Image/Image mode menu.

To flatten an image (all layers) you use the Image/Flatten Image menu choice.

There is also an option to Image/Merge layers which people often use when they are "finished" with work on a group of layers and so they basically flatten just the layers they are done working with.

But, flattening and merging can't be revisited once you save/close the file. So, like I said earlier, thought needs to be given to your workflow!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aimson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined May 2011
     
May 07, 2011 19:34 |  #7

Thanks for your help, it's much appreciated. Looks like I can add another hard drive on to my ever increasing photography budget. I knew I should have taken up skimming pebbles as a hobby; far less expensive :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
May 08, 2011 08:07 |  #8

16bpc is only needed if you do (big) luminance / color adjustments in Photoshop or use a wide gamut color space.
If you process sRGB files, in most cases 8bpc is plenty.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aimson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined May 2011
     
May 08, 2011 08:16 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #9

Thanks. By converting to 8bit, do you just mean saving as a Tiff Zip in the save options box. I assume this has no effect on the image quality. It just compresses it for storage purposes?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
May 08, 2011 08:21 |  #10

http://www.earthboundl​ight.com …sus-adobe-rgb-debate.html (external link)

There's also info on bit depth.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 08, 2011 15:52 |  #11

Zip and 8 bit are completely unrelated. A google search will help educate you. 8 bit is all you need if you do most of your processing in ACR/RAW. ZIP is lossless compression. Personally I use psd files, slightly less compatible but they're always compressed.

Turn off the "Maximise PSD/PSB compatibility" in photoshop file handling preferences if you use PSD and only use Adobe products with psd files. That creates a flattened extra layer.

Also use adjustment layers when you can. They take effectively no space.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,267 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Saving as Tiff file size
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2882 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.