VegasPoboy Senior Member  950 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV More info | Oct 08, 2005 11:36 | #1 Don't know if this has been covered yet but I would like to know if anyone who owns both cameras have compared the noise level @ 1600. I love my mark II and as discussed before the 20D has a better image than the mark II @1600 ISO. I'm looking to upgrade my 20D to the Mark IIn if it have a better image @ 1600 ISO. All replies welcome. $$$ in Canon Gear & Lighting Equipment
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pcasciola POTN SHOPKEEPER  3,130 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: Millstone Township, NJ More info | Oct 08, 2005 11:37 | #2 I'd be interested in the ISO 3200 results as well between the two. I had previously speculated this may have been improved with the N, but I haven't seen a direct comparison of these two bodies yet with regards to high ISO noise. Philip Casciola
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pekka El General Moderator  More info | Oct 08, 2005 12:12 | #3 I'd be suprised to see any difference. They are same camera, N has few extra UI features but same sensor and same Digic II. The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1676 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
- 