Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 08 May 2011 (Sunday) 13:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Saving huge JPEGs

 
Nickc84
Goldmember
Avatar
2,064 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Jul 2010
     
May 08, 2011 13:31 |  #1

Is there any benefit in saving huge JPEG files around 12-15meg files? I am new printing and these files are taking forever to upload to the printing website. I shot an event with a more experienced photographer and his hi res JPEGs are only 5-6 meg. I figured the larger the file the more quality it would keep but like I said I am new to printing digital files so if anyone could explain it to me for future stuff that would be great. Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 08, 2011 13:44 |  #2

How are you "saving" these files? What camera are you using and what software are you using?

A high quality jpeg will have various file sizes depending on the camera (resolution), the amount of detail in the image, and then the steps you take to produce it -- whether you resize it to a particular size and a particular ppi resolution and whether you crank the Quality setting all the way up or not.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nickc84
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,064 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Jul 2010
     
May 08, 2011 13:51 |  #3

Sorry, I am using a 7D and Adobe camera raw + Cs5 and saving at 300 PPI. I did crank the quality settings all the way thinking it would make a difference for high quality prints. Using Mpix btw and trying to print kodak endura




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
May 08, 2011 14:01 |  #4

jpg quality of about 9 or 10 (of 12) is plenty IMO.
Jpg file size depends on file size (pixels), detail in the image (incl. noise), and compression.
ppi is irrelevant, it's the amount of pixels that matters.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 08, 2011 15:41 |  #5

Your high resolution 7D files will be large at high quality settings. For smaller prints you can get away with a smaller size image, but for larger, you have to decide your own tradeoffs if you are targeting a particular print size.

For example, and 8x12 print can be done at high quality (300ppi) using a smaller file size -- (8x300)x(12x300) = 2400x3600 pixels, so a bit over 8 MPs, which would result in a substantially smaller file size. Save at the quality level mentioned above rather than the max quality and it shouldn't hurt the image.

Of course, going larger in print size means more pixel if you keep the same resolution. Just know that the 300ppi is a "target" but in reality you can go lower -- people get good results all the time from lower resolutions -- I have great prints done at less than 200 ppi that stand up to close scrutiny.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nickc84
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,064 posts
Likes: 80
Joined Jul 2010
     
May 08, 2011 21:40 |  #6

thanks for the help everyone




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 08, 2011 23:18 |  #7

Printing FAQ.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

673 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Saving huge JPEGs
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2768 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.