Been a while since I have posted on this thread;
1/80th of a second
F10
ISO 100
B-17 at KDVT
Mar 31, 2014 10:42 | #1081 Been a while since I have posted on this thread; Jeremy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MV-22 Osprey at Farnborough 2012. Canon 500D, EF 100-400 L, 1/100, f11 Kit list: Canon 5D mkIV & 6D mkII, EF 24-70L F4 IS, EF 70-200 F4 is, EF 50 f1.8 STM, Sigma 24-105 Art & Sigma 150-600 C
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwol Senior Member 813 posts Likes: 993 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Centreville,VA More info | Glamorous Gal photographed at Manassas airport's Wings, Wheels and Warriors 2011. John Lackey
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelbasher THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS More info | Apr 02, 2014 20:11 | #1084 that's a sweet shot of a sweet plane Jwol! There was one small tube of sunlight on this one through a hole in the clouds right before sundown. 1/25th@170mm IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/mH9i2N 50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yipDogStudios Goldmember 1,579 posts Likes: 43 Joined Nov 2012 Location: Mesa, AZ More info | Apr 03, 2014 10:08 | #1085 Falcon Warbirds blast down the runway at Falcon Field's open house www.yipdogstudios.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelbasher THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS More info | Apr 05, 2014 08:17 | #1086 1/10th @ 160mm. 50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwol Senior Member 813 posts Likes: 993 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Centreville,VA More info | Yes, you are seeing the effects of parallax. The lower the shutter speed, the more pronounce the effect will be. Also, the closer to the subject you are, the more pronounce the parallax effect will be. John Lackey
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pixelbasher THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,827 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lake Macquarie, AUS More info | Apr 05, 2014 09:55 | #1088 Cheers Jwol, I did think that initially but then I though that as I was over 400 meters away from the plane and "only" at 160mm I thought that maybe it was something else like maybe I unknowingly rotated the right side of the camera even just a fraction with the centre of movement coincidentally on the tail? 50D. 7D. 24-105L. 100-400L. 135L. 50 1.8 Sigma 8-16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BobbyMartin Senior Member More info | Apr 26, 2014 04:59 | #1089 |
GaryMcDuffie Goldmember 3,022 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsbluff, NE USA More info | Apr 26, 2014 16:42 | #1090 Nice one, Bobby. Gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Apr 26, 2014 21:42 | #1092 FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photoguynorth Member 178 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2004 More info | Apr 27, 2014 08:23 | #1095 BobbyMartin wrote in post #16862303 ![]() All I can say is that this is an awesome picture!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1734 guests, 149 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||