peterboroughphotography Member 81 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Peterborough near Stamford UK More info | May 10, 2011 15:49 | #1 |
Svetlana Goldmember 3,357 posts Likes: 11 Joined May 2008 Location: Calgary, AB More info | May 10, 2011 16:44 | #2 Beautiful gate!! Canon 7D, 5Dmk2, 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, Canon 50 1.2L, 35 1.4L, 85 1.8, Canon 16-35L, Canon 100 2.8L IS Macro, Speedlight 580EX II x 2, 430 EX, enthusiasm.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
peterboroughphotography THREAD STARTER Member 81 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Peterborough near Stamford UK More info | May 12, 2011 02:55 | #3 yet again, not the first choice photos just some not intended for the bride and groom, waiting for them to return from NY to view photos. http://www.peterboroughphotography.com - Wedding Photography and Event Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | May 12, 2011 15:37 | #4 Just curious why you would post "outakes?"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amonline Goldmember 3,558 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 More info | May 12, 2011 18:11 | #6 Color's great, but the center shooting and un-straightened kills it for me. It looks like a second shooter shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
peterboroughphotography THREAD STARTER Member 81 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Peterborough near Stamford UK More info | May 13, 2011 09:40 | #7 gonzogolf wrote in post #12397644 Just curious why you would post "outakes?" I never like to post shots until the bride and groom have made a selection. http://www.peterboroughphotography.com - Wedding Photography and Event Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | May 13, 2011 09:46 | #8 peterboroughphotography wrote in post #12402295 I never like to post shots until the bride and groom have made a selection. That shot wasnt for selection. You've made that point. Rut rather than post lesser shots prematurely, why not wait until you can post the better shots, and not suffer the comments on the inferior quality of the postings.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RedTiePhotography Goldmember 3,575 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: San Diego More info | May 13, 2011 10:06 | #9 gonzogolf wrote in post #12402333 You've made that point. Rut rather than post lesser shots prematurely, why not wait until you can post the better shots, and not suffer the comments on the inferior quality of the postings. This followed my train of thought. Bryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
peterboroughphotography THREAD STARTER Member 81 posts Joined May 2010 Location: Peterborough near Stamford UK More info | May 13, 2011 12:19 | #10 gonzogolf wrote in post #12402333 You've made that point. Rut rather than post lesser shots prematurely, why not wait until you can post the better shots, and not suffer the comments on the inferior quality of the postings. I dont need to be told how good something is http://www.peterboroughphotography.com - Wedding Photography and Event Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1555 guests, 165 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||