This is my daughter kinda staring into space. I've been shooting digital for a few months but new to photoshop so c&c is appreciated.
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
frankk Senior Member 825 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: NJ, USA More info | May 12, 2011 21:54 | #1 This is my daughter kinda staring into space. I've been shooting digital for a few months but new to photoshop so c&c is appreciated.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 12, 2011 22:10 | #2 Looks a little underexposed on my monitor. I would try to use fill to brighten her up a little bit. A the very least dodge and sharpen her eyes. I like your composition. Canon 60D, 5Diii, 24-105, 24-70ii, 70-200 f2.8 ii is, 580ex, (2)430ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 12, 2011 22:17 | #3 Seamus69 wrote in post #12399783 Looks a little underexposed on my monitor. I would try to use fill to brighten her up a little bit. A the very least dodge and sharpen her eyes. I like your composition. Thanks! I'll have to look on another computer cause on my big monitor she looks bright. Yes, the eyes. I did a lot of PP on this one...I cloned out her ear sticking through her hair and scars on her lip piercing and enhancing the background while masking out her and the the fence. I did dodge her eyes a bit but was afraid to overdo it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Great advice. I looked at my capture on other monitors and it was lacking. I updated the photo to brighten her face and whitened/sharpened her eyes as suggested (though I may have overdone it). Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gltch Mostly Lurking 11 posts Joined Jul 2010 More info | May 14, 2011 00:25 | #5 yeah, i think the you overdid the eyes a bit. bringing up the exposure all around might help. otherwise, i do like the shot. also i would have brought her over more to the left on the crop, but that's just my preference. - gltch | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Naphtali14 Member 70 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Chicago, USA More info | May 14, 2011 00:45 | #6 You're eye touch up is sloppy to be honest.. I can see the brush strokes around the edges and the whites are much toooo white. I'm not sure what method you're using to touch them up.. But if you're using something like a screen mode adjustment layer; try lowering the opacity after you brush over them.. Daniel Sather
LOG IN TO REPLY |
She's very pretty, but the image itself is way over processed. The eye's look like something from a horror movie poster. If you're working in photshop, you should work on a layer and reduce the opacity after you make the adjustments Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks all for the advice! I am using photoshop, but not correctly as I am learning. I didn't use a layer when I did the eye work. Here's a cleaned up version though I know I have to go back to square one to do this correctly. Live and learn.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 14, 2011 20:45 | #9 frankk wrote in post #12409844 Thanks all for the advice! I am using photoshop, but not correctly as I am learning. I didn't use a layer when I did the eye work. Here's a cleaned up version though I know I have to go back to square one to do this correctly. Live and learn.
Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charlesu Goldmember 4,320 posts Likes: 121 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Midwest More info | May 14, 2011 21:14 | #10 the eyes are better in 2. It does look a bit saturated as well. I tend to think portraits look better a little muted. Lovely girl. Thanks for stopping in and having a look.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 14, 2011 22:25 | #11 drdiesel1 wrote in post #12410783 Are you boosting the saturation too. Can you just post one without any processing, except conversion and resizing ? I would be willing to help you with your technique if you like ? Over processing and over saturation are the most over used image processing techniques. I use to do the same thing, but finally learned it makes the images look worse ![]() Thanks for the offer. Here is the original. No processing, just resized.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 15, 2011 01:12 | #12 frankk wrote in post #12411201 Thanks for the offer. Here is the original. No processing, just resized. Great. Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Here's a quick and dirty edit. Nikon D810 Nikon 50F/1.4G - Nikon 70-200F/2.8II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
peoplearescary Member 34 posts Joined Mar 2010 More info | May 15, 2011 10:22 | #14 The second edit is much better, the eyes in the original post were freaking me out
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 15, 2011 14:59 | #15 drdiesel1 wrote in post #12411813 Here's a quick and dirty edit. Great suggestions. Thanks. I see what you did to brighten things up but have to ask how you dealt with the redness in her eyes? Her eyes look really clean in your version.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2728 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||