Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 14 May 2011 (Saturday) 11:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Noiseware Photo Resizing/Reduction Question??

 
Ralph ­ III
Goldmember
1,352 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Alabama
     
May 14, 2011 11:17 |  #1

Hello,
I'm using the Noiseware (free "community edition"), which does an excellent job btw, but it resizes/reduces my pictures? It's really not resizing my pic per say, as it retains the same dimensions(3850x2567), but instead saving with less mb. My original pic is 9.87mb but only 2.56mb after using the noise reduction tool.

My concern, is this particular one will be for a large print. Will this reduction affect the final print, as it still shows much better than the original in clarity/noise on the computer, even with extreme cropping.

Otherwise, how can I re-increase the file size for printing? The print will be either a 16x20 or larger.

Thanks


"SOUTHERN and SAVED!"
POTN FEEDBACK...............ITEMS FOR SALE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
May 14, 2011 12:55 |  #2

The very nature of noise reduction reduces file size. 9.87mb to 2.5 is a pretty big drop, so I'd make sure you're not saving at a lower quality, but it's feasible if the image was a overly dark/bright shot with a lot of noise.


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ralph ­ III
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,352 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Alabama
     
May 14, 2011 13:40 |  #3

BrandonSi wrote in post #12408776 (external link)
The very nature of noise reduction reduces file size. 9.87mb to 2.5 is a pretty big drop, so I'd make sure you're not saving at a lower quality, but it's feasible if the image was a overly dark/bright shot with a lot of noise.

Thanks. The freeware version states it is saving at 90% jpeg? It will not let you save at a higher percentage (reserved for paid version). What I've experienced however is about a 75% reduction and thus actually saving pic at about 25%, not 90%?

Is there any way of increasing that within the program or within Photoshop or DPP? There is no extreme lighting in the picture, etc. It just has some noise and softness showing with enlarging and as I want to correct. The program fixes that perfectly but then saves at a lower mp.

Ralph


"SOUTHERN and SAVED!"
POTN FEEDBACK...............ITEMS FOR SALE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
May 14, 2011 15:21 |  #4

The percentage is not related to file size, it's related to quality. If it's set to 90% I'm sure that's what it's doing, but that has no direct correlation to the decrease in file size.

Photoshop actually as a noise reduction filter, so you could try that if the image isn't terribly noisy..

ACR also has this feature.

http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=S2OXyLRDgrk (external link)


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ralph ­ III
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,352 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Alabama
     
May 15, 2011 08:53 as a reply to  @ BrandonSi's post |  #5

Thanks for the help.

I went to the Noiseware forum to get a response from someone quite familiar with the program and he basically explained, the file size decreases because the program rids the pic of all the excessive noise. The dimensions are not affected, as noted.

I did some extreme crops, with 5 x 7 prints for comparisons, and there is no degregation of the photo. In fact, the difference in quality only grows between the Noiseware photo and the unedited original as you continue to crop. It would actually be better for large prints, no matter the file shrinking, as the difference is significant. I isolated and cropped a head-shot, which would have rendered an excellent 30" print of the full photo. The difference is amazing.

I did try various combinations of sharpening and noise reduction in both DPP and PSE but the results couldn't be duplicated, especially with such ease. I am going to contact their support to see if the paid version saves larger files as I envision using the program.
Ralph


"SOUTHERN and SAVED!"
POTN FEEDBACK...............ITEMS FOR SALE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 15, 2011 18:35 |  #6

Like you mentioned above, the freeware saves at a 90% Quality setting whereas a 100% Quality setting would certainly give you a larger jpeg.

But, the bigger picture that you need to "get" is that there will not be a difference in resolution between the two -- fine detail should be retained just fine and, as you have noted, good noise reduction can bring an improvement in an enlarged image/print. Let your eyes be the judge, and don't get your head in the way:)!

My only suggestion with the freeware is that you do this in a way that you are not doing multiple edits and saving of a jpeg. If I recall correctly, the freeware does not give you a tiff option, meaning that it does jpeg compression for your output. That's fine as a "final product" but is not best for a "wirk in progress" project file. So, it's best done at the end of the workflow rather than earlier on.

And, that would certainly be a consideration in favor of the for-pay version -- that version should have the option of saving the result as a tiff which you can then bring into say Elements and edit and save freely without repeated compression losses. Aand, this is also a big plus from using plug-ins -- you are working with one high-quality file within the Photoshop environment rather than having to go back and forth with external software.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
May 15, 2011 18:49 |  #7

BrandonSi wrote in post #12408776 (external link)
The very nature of noise reduction reduces file size. 9.87mb to 2.5 is a pretty big drop, so I'd make sure you're not saving at a lower quality, but it's feasible if the image was a overly dark/bright shot with a lot of noise.

I have never noticed that effect in CS5. Does this happen only when processing JPGS from Noiseware standalone, or is it happening in CS and I just never noticed it? I am curious about why it is happening, too. Noise reduction seems like pretty interesting technology.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ralph ­ III
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,352 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Alabama
     
May 15, 2011 22:08 |  #8

tonylong wrote in post #12415532 (external link)
Like you mentioned above, the freeware saves at a 90% Quality setting whereas a 100% Quality setting would certainly give you a larger jpeg.

But, the bigger picture that you need to "get" is that there will not be a difference in resolution between the two -- fine detail should be retained just fine and, as you have noted, good noise reduction can bring an improvement in an enlarged image/print. Let your eyes be the judge, and don't get your head in the way:)!..."

Exactly! All good advice, btw. That's why I continued to work in various progams, knowing this would be a fairly large print, but none rendered as good of results as the Noiseware utility, which is a very easy process.

The photo was for some friends and they could go as large as a 24 x 36in. with excellent results. The head crops (2 in photo) I performed were full faces that I printed on 5 x 7 photo paper (landscape layout), which would
equate to a near 40in. print with the original photo (4 kids on large oak limb). The prints were so good I gave them the 5 x 7 head shots as well. In comparison, I would only venture printing a 16 x 20 print with the original layout or slightly larger as PSE or DPP noise reduction rendered.

As it stands, they have plenty of room to further crop the original if desired and still get a great 20 x 24in or 20 x 30in print.:)

Take care


"SOUTHERN and SAVED!"
POTN FEEDBACK...............ITEMS FOR SALE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,950 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Noiseware Photo Resizing/Reduction Question??
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2585 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.