Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 16 May 2011 (Monday) 18:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

good glass and post processing

 
john_galt
Senior Member
576 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 16, 2011 18:42 |  #1

just throwing this out there, i started to wonder, a lot of people have great glass for the color rendering it can output, then do their own post processing that are different than how the lens makes the photo look originally. could this be done with any decent glass if they were going to modify the colors/tones/curves/cr​oss process/etc? or does having good colors from great glass to start off with help? not including sharpness.
do you think good post processing can turn an ok photo with ok composition and ok subject matter into a great one? i'm pretty sure bad/over post processing can make a good photo just ok


Gear: 5d iii, 17-40mm l, 24-70mm ii, 35mm 1.4 l, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 135mm l, 70-200mm ii l, 600ex-rt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goldboughtrue
Goldmember
1,857 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
     
May 16, 2011 19:23 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

If you have great color from the lens, you have more leverage to process how you like it. However, if you have poor color from the start, it's going to be harder to turn that into good color during processing.

john_galt wrote in post #12422292 (external link)
do you think good post processing can turn an ok photo with ok composition and ok subject matter into a great one? i'm pretty sure bad/over post processing can make a good photo just ok

I don't think you can process an ok image to be spectacular; I believe you need a great image to start with.


http://www.pbase.com/g​oldbough (external link)

5D II, Canon 100 macro, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 24-105 L, Canon TS-E 45, Sigma Art 35mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
leeport
Senior Member
Avatar
816 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2008
     
May 16, 2011 20:52 |  #3

Richard Alverado is amazing at turning a good photo into something spectacular.
This thread https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1041457 is typical of what he can do. Check out all his other threads too. You wanna step up your game? Try to do what he does.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
May 16, 2011 20:56 |  #4

Not his best work IMO.

Worth searching him out nonetheless though...


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
leeport
Senior Member
Avatar
816 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2008
     
May 17, 2011 11:07 |  #5

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #12423092 (external link)
Not his best work IMO.

Worth searching him out nonetheless though...


I was refering to his style and more importantly to answer the OP's question. IMO glass over body, but PP over all.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
May 17, 2011 16:35 |  #6

a lot of people have great glass for the color rendering it can output, then do their own post processing that are different than how the lens makes the photo look originally.

A digital sensor does not see colors, only intensity of light at three wavelengths. The RAW stage in the data stream does not contain colors, only a record of those intensities. The color is interpolated in later when the jpg (in camera) or jpg/tif/psd (in converter) is processed and rendered. Although the chromatic transmission characteristics of the lens will certainly affect the voltages output by the sensor, the later color interpolation and the profile that relates the numbers to actual colors are far more dominant factors. In other words, there is always processing and it is more important in determining the way the photo looks than the lens' contribution.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
May 17, 2011 20:45 |  #7

All true, more or less, but not really important since the cameras processing is consistent, no matter what lens is mounted. You can't change the camera's internal processing but you can change the lens, therefore, for you and me, the lens is more important to the final output.

With that said, ok composition and ok subject is still that. If you can change the composition and subject in post, all the more power to you but I'd rather not have to start with garbage in. I'm lazy :-)


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,890 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
good glass and post processing
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1105 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.