Ahhh! It was a 300mm after all, I was a bit disappointed in the 500's size if that was it

i dunno i was pretty shocked at this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAeSWsTqKbQ![]()
the 500 isnt nearly as huge as i thought

KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | May 16, 2011 23:46 | #61 themadman wrote in post #12424081 Ahhh! It was a 300mm after all, I was a bit disappointed in the 500's size if that was it ![]() i dunno i was pretty shocked at this: Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | May 16, 2011 23:47 | #62 themadman wrote in post #12424076 Hmm... the 500mm is that small? No, the 300 just doesn't have that much behind the tripod mount, but then I noticed it was a 2x extender.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2011 23:47 | #63 themadman wrote in post #12424081 Ahhh! It was a 300mm after all, I was a bit disappointed in the 500's size if that was it ![]() haha I wanna see them make a 500mm f/5.6 the size of the 70-200mm f/4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigApplePhotography Wish I had a 5D Classic 4,148 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Near a pot of gold More info | May 16, 2011 23:47 | #64 |
tonylong ...winded More info | May 16, 2011 23:48 | #65 KenjiS wrote in post #12424080 ^- Whaa? it looks too long for a 300 o_O Weird.. i thought the 300s were more compact... That f/2.8 makes it way wide and the lens hood makes it look way long Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | May 16, 2011 23:48 | #66 monk3y wrote in post #12424090 if you leave home you better have internet access wherever you go otherwise you won't be able to pull it off ![]() 1. School is out, I can stay home all day if I want (although I rarely do) Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2011 23:48 | #67 KenjiS wrote in post #12424093 i dunno i was pretty shocked at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAeSWsTqKbQ the 500 isnt nearly as huge as i thought yeah it looks very very handholdable Kenji
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | May 16, 2011 23:49 | #68 themadman wrote in post #12424104 1. School is out, I can stay home all day if I want (although I rarely do) 2. I haz iPhone 4 ![]() Go for it Will! If you need any pointers, let me know
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | May 16, 2011 23:49 | #69 KenjiS wrote in post #12424093 i dunno i was pretty shocked at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAeSWsTqKbQ the 500 isnt nearly as huge as i thought f4.5 and f4 make a difference in girth! It is gonna have to be long still unless it uses detractive optics, it is gonna be larger than the 400 f.56 as well which is larger than the 70-200 f4 I believe? Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | May 16, 2011 23:50 | #70 monk3y wrote in post #12424109 yeah it looks very very handholdable Kenji But 500mm and no IS is gonna be hard, need some fast shutter speed! I am counting on your help! Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | May 16, 2011 23:50 | #71 BOKEH! Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2011 23:50 | #72 |
BigApplePhotography Wish I had a 5D Classic 4,148 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Near a pot of gold More info | May 16, 2011 23:52 | #73 I hope you starve to death steven Love POTN? Donate!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | May 16, 2011 23:52 | #74 *sigh* wrote in post #12424097 No, the 300 just doesn't have that much behind the tripod mount, but then I noticed it was a 2x extender. Yeah, those big primes play well with the 2x. It was a pretty standard combo for me when I went out birding -- sometimes nice and close, even with the 5D: Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman wrote in post #12424104 1. School is out, I can stay home all day if I want (although I rarely do) 2. I haz iPhone 4 ![]() hahaha wow!!! looks like a tough opponent hahahahhaa.... no you don't themadman wrote in post #12424114 f4.5 and f4 make a difference in girth! It is gonna have to be long still unless it uses detractive optics, it is gonna be larger than the 400 f.56 as well which is larger than the 70-200 f4 I believe? actually its ok as long as its light weight not 3KG hehe...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1045 guests, 145 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||