If you want to make the background less distracting, you should probably be making it LESS in focus, not more, but I don't have a problem with it the way it is now.
So you're think more along the lines of going with f/4 instead of f/5.6 right?
May 20, 2011 12:30 | #16 archer1960 wrote in post #12447052 If you want to make the background less distracting, you should probably be making it LESS in focus, not more, but I don't have a problem with it the way it is now. So you're think more along the lines of going with f/4 instead of f/5.6 right? 5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airshaq20 Senior Member 667 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: East Coast, USA More info | May 20, 2011 12:36 | #17 |
May 20, 2011 12:49 | #18 airshaq20 wrote in post #12447252 Can you share how you made your snoot? Tnx! I went to Michael's craft store and purchased one sheet of black foam for 99 cents. I then shaped it into a cone, just enough so that the larger hole fit snug over the outer rim of the light. I then temporarily used gaffer tape in three places to hold it in that position so when I removed it it wouldn't unravel. I then used velcro roll to locate two anchor points (on the foam sheet, not the light) where I could adhere the velcro to. Once I did that and the cone was secure, I trimmed off the excess foam that was sticking out of the large opening so that it looked completely round and fit nicely over the light's outer ring. 5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kechar Goldmember 1,699 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Atlanta, Georgia More info | May 20, 2011 12:58 | #19 PhoenixPhotography wrote in post #12446895 I believe you are off to a great start. I would like to see a little more fill in the shadow area of your face. Possibly bring the reflector in a little closer or change the angle a bit. A lot of times when I am shooting and get a shadow such as this I have a 4th head (AB400) that I will set up on a short stand turned all the way down with a 40 degree grid. That will add great fill exactly where you want it. You could also experiment a little bit with head position. Something else I would try, put your background light directly behind you angled up just a touch. This will give you a more even penumbra (I believe that is the correct term). Well said.
Lighting is reversed from what would be best for her hair part. Not keen on hairlight on her part like that, but still not overbearing. Notice the hairlight also bathes her shoulder a bit. I feel this was correctly lit (lights on the correct side). I'm still learning, but I hope this helps some! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 20, 2011 13:10 | #20 Very impressive shots. I don't think I'll ever be able to achieve this. What I wouldn't do to spend an hour with someone that produces this type of work. Kechar wrote in post #12447399 BG light directly behind angled up! With just a plain 'ol deflector dish that came with the light? I have no grids or anything like that yet so I won't be able to prevent spill. Kechar wrote in post #12447399 You may also consider throwing you hair light up really high and directly opposite your main. What you have going looks like an intense rim lighting, not hair lighting. Fair enough. So you're thinking I should set it up like I had in my original setup? See photos from original post. I'm just afraid to set it any higher than I have it now (or had it originally). The boom starts to bend at a certain point and I'm afraid it will have a permanent bend. On top of that I'm afraid the whole stand may tip over. Is my stand not good enough? I thought it was when I bought it (Manfrotto 420B). Or is it that my light is just too heavy? The Genesis 200 is really a light for cash-strapped newbies like myself. The strip box and grid certainly add some weight to it all. 5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kechar Goldmember 1,699 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Atlanta, Georgia More info | May 20, 2011 13:28 | #21 Very impressive shots. I don't think I'll ever be able to achieve this. What I wouldn't do to spend an hour with someone that produces this type of work. LOL thank you sooooo much!!! I never owned a single light before March of this year. I just read read read and read and followed what others were doing. I have soooo much more to learn!!! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 20, 2011 13:32 | #22 Kechar wrote in post #12447567 LOL thank you sooooo much!!! I never owned a single light before March of this year. I just read read read and read and followed what others were doing. I have soooo much more to learn!!! BTW...did you shoot those with your 50 f1.4? 5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kechar Goldmember 1,699 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Atlanta, Georgia More info | May 20, 2011 13:38 | #23 Either that or my Tamron 17-50 f2.8 which I use most in the studio because of size constraints. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2845 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||