hyogen wrote in post #14907868
great shot! I'm wondering though..kinda on the fence about buying an expensive circular polarizing filter... could this picture, in your opinion, have been improved with a polarizing filter? or is the soft/glowy skin what you were going for? just wondering
do you guys have a consensus about filters and this lens? uv or whatever.. thanks

I'm not sure to be honest what a circular polarizer would do. Skin processing is part of my regimen on every photo I post, though this one is rather lightly edited and has plenty of skin detail at 100%. As for tones and the exposure I'm not sure if a polarizer would have helped at all, I've actually never used them, but from what I understand they help when you want to make the sky darker and cut out reflections, not much of that in this particular photo!
As for UV filters, It depends the photographer, I personally never use UV filters, in my opinion you have to spend at least 70-120 on a UV filter good enough (depending the size of the filter) that it wont cut back on your lens's performance, at that price point you may as well send a scratched/cracked front element in to get repaired which costs around 200 bucks total depending on the lens. Some also say that front element glass is much stronger than UV filter glass, so when people say "thank god I had a UV filter on, it cracked right through, that woulda been my lens element!" it may not necessarily be true, in fact the cracked UV filter may scratch the front element more than the actual collision with whatever you are hitting would have.
That being said, many photographers swear by UV filters in front of every single lens they own!