daveyboi Senior Member 652 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Stockton, CA More info | Jul 27, 2011 14:56 | #301 5D Mark II // 17-40L SOLD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mookalafalas Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 27, 2011 19:46 | #302 latukka, nice tests! The CAs (Chromatic Aberrations) you point out are always present on these large aperture primes. Some are worse than others, but in my inexpert opinion, this one is better than most. Call me Al Gear Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
v_lestat Senior Member 462 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA More info | Jul 27, 2011 19:54 | #303 anyone been able to successfully get an AF chip calibrated correctly.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
v_lestat Senior Member 462 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA More info | Jul 27, 2011 21:54 | #304 Mookalafalas wrote in post #12834273 latukka, nice tests! The CAs (Chromatic Aberrations) you point out are always present on these large aperture primes. Some are worse than others, but in my inexpert opinion, this one is better than most.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mookalafalas Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 27, 2011 22:08 | #305 How much is too much is pretty subjective. CA doesn't bother me much, personally, but you can see green fringing around the dog's right leg and over the top of his head in the 5DII picture 4 posts above this one. Call me Al Gear Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Citizen_Insane Senior Member 453 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Ames, IA More info | Jul 28, 2011 09:14 | #306 |
BrandonSi Nevermind.. I'm silly. More info | Jul 28, 2011 09:15 | #307 latukka wrote in post #12832844 1:1 Something blue/green and red glow. What is this? This seems to happen when shooting white sharp objects in bright lighting. ![]() Flower 1.4 1:1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Noodlz Member 247 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Jul 28, 2011 10:10 | #308 v_lestat wrote in post #12834311 anyone been able to successfully get an AF chip calibrated correctly. turning the lens clockwise (if you were facing the front of the lens) back focuses turning counter clockwise is pretty close but still back focuses. either way it looks like counter clockwise rotation is the only rotation i can use that will give me proper results unless i am using live view. i tried to MA with the camera and its just wierd, its like the system is fighting it and doesnt want to MA properly. i have not tried the MAY in the lens because its a pretty tedious process to do it. still love the lens though! Great shots everyone
23-07-11 302
23-07-11 459-2 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/55528252@N02/5984262471/ 23-07-11 547-2
23-07-11 720 edit: just noticed I shot these in JPG not RAW hence these may be a bit lacking in detail ![]() Sean | Image Storm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nyy Senior Member 616 posts Joined May 2006 Location: New Jersey More info | Jul 28, 2011 20:45 | #309 Noodlz, great shots! "I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside." --Mitch Hedberg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
babel_fish Goldmember 1,924 posts Likes: 18 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Seattle More info | Jul 29, 2011 16:23 | #310 Noodlz wrote in post #12837286 Great shots everyone ![]() edit: just noticed I shot these in JPG not RAW hence these may be a bit lacking in detail ![]() ...dont you hate when that happens "The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time." -Bertrand Russell
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cptrios Goldmember 1,745 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France More info | Jul 29, 2011 17:52 | #311 Ever since my first RAW-capable camera (a Powershot S50), I decided that I'd never shoot a JPEG again. Every once in a while I'll switch to RAW+JPEG just for a laugh, and it's really incredible how crappy JPEGS look. I blame Ken Rockwell for the continued acceptance of JPEG quality! Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Noodlz Member 247 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Jul 30, 2011 02:10 | #312 babel_fish wrote in post #12844875 ...dont you hate when that happens I like the street one, nice candid and colour.Thanks! Hehe yes I always kick myself when it happens, I was doing some timelapse the previous night and forgot to change it back, thankfully resizing helps a little but there's still a lot of detail lost and you can definitely see it in the above images! Sean | Image Storm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
latukka Hatchling 3 posts Joined Jul 2011 More info | Aug 02, 2011 10:44 | #313 Noodlz wrote in post #12664524 Also received the Dandelions - AF confirm chip (Programmable) for Canon EOS Camera from Tago Tech (http://store.tagotech.com …_info.php?products_id=139 . After getting it on I had to read the programming manual to program the chip. Programmed it to read f/1.4 and 35mm to start with. Found that the focusing confirmation was totally out of wack so I set the focus adjustment forward from the value of 9 to about 6 and now it nails pretty much perfectly. Only catch is it seems to be spot on only when turning the focus ring left. Going right the focus is a bit off. Funny.. but still happy to have some sort of reliable focus confirm, just need to work with the idiosyncrasies of this lense! I'll have to see how I go in the field proper with the chip but shooting around the house it's looking good. Anyway heres a shot of the quick and dirty focus chip on the lense!![]() 27-06-11 122 I'm having trouble fitting my chip to the lens. With my chip there came two black plastic back supports. Did you use one of those? It looks like I should not need those if I glue the chip to flat inner metal circle. However it didn't get contact to the camera like that. Did you attach the chip just flat to the inner ring or on top of the outer ring?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Noodlz Member 247 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Aug 02, 2011 19:39 | #314 latukka wrote in post #12863501 I'm having trouble fitting my chip to the lens. With my chip there came two black plastic back supports. Did you use one of those? It looks like I should not need those if I glue the chip to flat inner metal circle. However it didn't get contact to the camera like that. Did you attach the chip just flat to the inner ring or on top of the outer ring? Hey latukka, I pretty much attached it as seen in the above image(the inner metal circle), surprisingly I only had to use one strip of double sided adhesive tape from 3M, you can find them for cheap on ebay. I didn't use any plastic back supports. Its a bit of trial and error but the position guide does help greatly to get the chip in the right spot, as long as the position is good I've found you dont need to raise the height of the chip much at all as only 1 layer of the double adhesive did it for me Sean | Image Storm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cichlid Member 47 posts Joined Aug 2010 More info | Aug 03, 2011 03:31 | #315 Hi everyone!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1733 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||