Anyone know how to fix this problem? Most of my pictures look great in Lightroom but whenever I upload it on fb, it seems to have a lot of noises.
binderring Member 69 posts Joined Apr 2011 More info | May 19, 2011 14:25 | #1 Anyone know how to fix this problem? Most of my pictures look great in Lightroom but whenever I upload it on fb, it seems to have a lot of noises.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | May 19, 2011 14:30 | #2 It's not noise; it's digital compression. It happens automatically. The only solution is to not upload your photos to facebook if it concerns you that much. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mckinleypics Goldmember 1,809 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Minnesota More info | May 19, 2011 14:31 | #3 You can share a link to flickr instead. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddR Senior Member 766 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: central Iowa More info | May 19, 2011 14:34 | #4 Is it still useful to size to 720 pixels on the longest side of an image before uploading to Facebook?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChelseySomohano Senior Member 317 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Nashville, TN More info | May 19, 2011 14:37 | #5 We usually upload ours at 72dpi and 700 on the longest size. Seems to make a little bit of a difference. Remeber, downloaded high quality images gives users the ability to download those high res files. 50D | 35L | 24-70L | 50 1.8 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Staszek Goldmember 3,606 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | May 19, 2011 14:55 | #6 Chelsey Somohano wrote in post #12441330 We usually upload ours at 72dpi and 700 on the longest size. Seems to make a little bit of a difference. Remeber, downloaded high quality images gives users the ability to download those high res files. Users can dl photos regardless of quality. Also dpi does not make a difference in digital format. SOSKIphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 19, 2011 15:05 | #7 Thanks guys!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | May 19, 2011 22:51 | #8 In Lightroom just make sure that you Export to an FB-size image (720 pixels max length). As was said, the ppi figure doesn't matter -- you set Export to dimensions in pixels and just enter 720 or smaller in the widest dimension. Your jpeg quality shouldn't be a big concern, you can play with it, say 50-60-70 but really for Web size images it matters little (unless you have people who are downloading them and trying to print them. Anyone who gets it in their head to try that from Facebook is in for well-deserved disappointment. Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark1 Cream of the Crop 6,725 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Maryland More info | May 19, 2011 22:57 | #9 Staszek wrote in post #12441457 Also dpi does not make a difference in digital format. Not for image quality on screen, but it will for file size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonman78213 Member 84 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: south TX More info | May 19, 2011 23:43 | #10 Just saw this post and although the shots I post up to FB load up fine, the watermark and the watermark ONLY are blurry on most shots. The actual image is great. Thinking maybe a FB compression issue? just odd that it doe NOT effect the actual images, only the watermark; which I put on in Lightroom 3. Just curious if anybody has come across this too when posting watermarked shots to FB using the Lightroom 3 watermarking. And if so, if there's a way to modify the watermark so that it is not blurry on FB. On all other sites it's just fine. [B]Canon 5D mrk II,Canon XSI, gripped. 5D classic,70-200 2.8L IS, Canon EF-S 10-22mm/3.5-4.5USM, 50mm/1.8 nifty fifty mrk I (NOT the newer plastic fantastic) 35mm/1.4LmrkI, 85mm/1.2L, 200mm/2.8L mrk I, 1.4 mrk IIand 2X mrkI canon TCs, Canon 430EX II, Induro Alloy 6M Tripod A-014 with Manfrotto 484RC2 Mini Ball Head with RC2 Rapid Connect Plate
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChelseySomohano Senior Member 317 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Nashville, TN More info | May 20, 2011 00:10 | #11 Staszek wrote in post #12441457 Users can dl photos regardless of quality. Also dpi does not make a difference in digital format. Right, but wouldn't you rather them download a 700px wide image rather than a 1024px image. I know if my clients want a high-res image, they pay for it. 50D | 35L | 24-70L | 50 1.8 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | May 20, 2011 00:31 | #12 Mark1 wrote in post #12443998 Not for image quality on screen, but it will for file size. For the Web, ppi/dpi is meaningless. The Web only "knows" the dimension in pixels. And, unless you are dealing with a commercial lab/print shop, it is also meaningless -- you specify a print size and they handle the sizing unless you want to get into resampling an image. But, for the Web, there is only one ppi, and that is that of the monitor which a viewer is using, which is out of your control! And, that hasn't been anywhere near 72 ppi for decades -- these days it is closer to 100 ppi Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Staszek Goldmember 3,606 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | May 20, 2011 00:40 | #13 Chelsey Somohano wrote in post #12444383 Right, but wouldn't you rather them download a 700px wide image rather than a 1024px image. I know if my clients want a high-res image, they pay for it. Correct. Which is why all my facebook pictures are uploaded at 640p SOSKIphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | May 20, 2011 01:19 | #14 Mark1 wrote in post #12443998 Not for image quality on screen, but it will for file size. No, it won't. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark1 Cream of the Crop 6,725 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Maryland More info | May 20, 2011 08:03 | #15 René Damkot wrote in post #12444707 No, it won't. If you know what you are doing it does.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Sandro Bisotti 1678 guests, 161 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||