Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 May 2011 (Friday) 01:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How to tell if you're not getting a lemon?

 
LeeRatters
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,903 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9562
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Bristol, UK
     
May 21, 2011 04:44 |  #31

personally, i do think it asking a bit much of the kit lens to handle the inside/dark photo with no flash.
as you've found out, the 50/1.8 is not the best at low light autofocus - that's about the only problem i have with mine otherwise it serves me pretty well for what i use it for & it's probably my most used lens considering it's value to the rest of my gear.
i don't get terrible or noticable fringing from mine though.
i doubt you'll get perfect pin sharp images though shooting inside in dark conditions at 1.8, 1/50 shutter, and 6400 ISO esp of people.

why is flash not an option?


>> Flickr << (external link)


>> Instagram<< (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TridenTBoy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: West coast, USA
     
May 21, 2011 04:53 |  #32

LeeRatters wrote in post #12451279 (external link)
personally, i do think it asking a bit much of the kit lens to handle the inside/dark photo with no flash.
as you've found out, the 50/1.8 is not the best at low light autofocus - that's about the only problem i have with mine otherwise it serves me pretty well for what i use it for & it's probably my most used lens considering it's value to the rest of my gear.
i don't get terrible or noticable fringing from mine though.
i doubt you'll get perfect pin sharp images though shooting inside in dark conditions at 1.8, 1/50 shutter, and 6400 ISO esp of people.

why is flash not an option?

It's far too intrusive. I already have a camera that I am pointing at peoples faces. I don't need them to be blinded by a direct flash or a bounce flash. No one wants to be like, "Wtf was that? Lightning?" when they're in the room. It's dark and you're basically lighting it up randomly for milliseconds...

I'm really finding the lack of full time manual focus and how crappy the focus ring is, how little much the camera can change the focus and all that very problematic. The camera shifts between two little notches because that's all it can adjust by and the image can still be blurry because it's not on the subject correctly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dizzy321
Member
Avatar
221 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Mar 2011
Location: San Diego/Palmdale
     
May 21, 2011 05:15 |  #33

LONETRAVELER wrote in post #12444979 (external link)
On the extreme side, here in San Diego someone put of a Craiglist's posting selling a laptop. When the guy got there, 3 teens robbed him of his cash and cell phone. They leave in a car. He follows them to get the plates. They end up shooting and killing him.

WOW...im out here in SD too and I pratically live on craigslist, I've sold and bought so many items off there. Reading this has definitely made me more aware.


5D mark 2 | Instax 210 | Elan 7e | 35L | 50 f1.4 | 85L II
facebook  (external link)

instagram: @davidbrisco
davidbrisco.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
funkyfones
Senior Member
Avatar
350 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Bradford, Uk
     
May 21, 2011 08:09 |  #34

TridenTBoy wrote in post #12451290 (external link)
I'm really finding the lack of full time manual focus and how crappy the focus ring is, how little much the camera can change the focus and all that very problematic. The camera shifts between two little notches because that's all it can adjust by and the image can still be blurry because it's not on the subject correctly.

Get a mk1 maybe? or for abit more a 1.4


Gear: Afew bodies and afew pieces of glass | Flickr (external link)| Lens/cameras repairs and for sale | (external link)Website for camera/lens repairs (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edofloat
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Up North.
     
May 21, 2011 08:31 |  #35

TridenTBoy wrote in post #12451193 (external link)
... Oh, and a serious problem was it was hunting for focus WAY too often! Literally I'd hold down the button and it'd hunt for well over a second!

Have you tried MF rather than AF?


|Gear | Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TridenTBoy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: West coast, USA
     
May 21, 2011 13:47 |  #36

edofloat wrote in post #12451696 (external link)
Have you tried MF rather than AF?

MF on the 1.8 is laughable. There's almost no play at all.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ultimachi
Senior Member
Avatar
836 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
May 21, 2011 17:16 |  #37

TridenTBoy wrote in post #12448785 (external link)
Picture of a girl who modeled for me as she crossed the street: http://img19.imageshac​k.us/img19/5777/img049​8s.jpg (external link) Her friend was wondering WTF she was doing as she walked. :P

The question is.....what did you do AFTER you took the photo. :cool:


*Wedding/Portraits Facebook Page* (external link) *Wedding/Portraits Blog* (external link) *Automotive Facebook Page* (external link) *Automotive Photography Blog* (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ok_Student3368
Senior Member
767 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
May 21, 2011 19:36 |  #38

Trident, I mentioned on AT forums that you need to focus on something that will HELP your camera.

Do a little reading about AF points and how crosspoint AF works. They look for a contrast. Imagine holding your finger in front of your eye. now when there's an intersection of good contrast that passes your finger perpendicularly, you can get good AF there.

So that's why we say focus on eyebrows if you're struggling in low light. If you point at someone's hair, you're not gonna get the best AF especially if they're dark haired to begin with. Take any camera and point it at the ceiling of your room. A white ceiling cannot AF well. Even if its textured my 7D cannot do it well because it's dim.

Second of all, you need to look into back button AF for your dark shooting. You don't want it to constantly hunt:

http://www.learn.usa.c​anon.com …ckbutton_af_art​icle.shtml (external link)

I shot a 50 1.8 for 6 months before I broke it. It's solid. You don't need to worry about FTM or any of those other things. For what you're doing it's FINE. Learn to use it properly and you'll AF just fine.

BTW to other posters here, Trident is known as a troll on AT forums. Let's hope he doesn't turn into one here :D It has to do with something and not taking people's advice and not thinking a little more... something that's already becoming obvious in this thread.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TridenTBoy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: West coast, USA
     
May 21, 2011 19:39 |  #39

dmo580 wrote in post #12454194 (external link)
Trident, I mentioned on AT forums that you need to focus on something that will HELP your camera.

Do a little reading about AF points and how crosspoint AF works. They look for a contrast. Imagine holding your finger in front of your eye. now when there's an intersection of good contrast that passes your finger perpendicularly, you can get good AF there.

So that's why we say focus on eyebrows if you're struggling in low light. If you point at someone's hair, you're not gonna get the best AF especially if they're dark haired to begin with. Take any camera and point it at the ceiling of your room. A white ceiling cannot AF well. Even if its textured my 7D cannot do it well because it's dim.

Second of all, you need to look into back button AF for your dark shooting. You don't want it to constantly hunt:

http://www.learn.usa.c​anon.com …ckbutton_af_art​icle.shtml (external link)

I still don't know what the heck back button shooting means after reading that. :/ Also my subjects are almost always in motion. They get out of focus super fast at the aperture required to make pictures not darkness.

ultimachi wrote in post #12453680 (external link)
The question is.....what did you do AFTER you took the photo. :cool:

;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ok_Student3368
Senior Member
767 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
May 21, 2011 19:42 |  #40

TridenTBoy wrote in post #12454204 (external link)
I still don't know what the heck back button shooting means after reading that. :/ Also my subjects are almost always in motion. They get out of focus super fast at the aperture required to make pictures not darkness.

What shutter speeds are you getting right now in your shots?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philwillmedia
Cream of the Crop
5,253 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Nov 2008
Location: "...just south of the 23rd Paralell..."
     
May 21, 2011 19:43 |  #41

TridenTBoy wrote in post #12454204 (external link)
I still don't know what the heck back button shooting means after reading that...

He means back button focusing.
It's when you set the * button to be your primary source of focus as opposed to half pressing the shutter button.

Do a forum search for back button focus.
It's been discussed plenty.


Regards, Phil
2019 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year - Runner Up
2018 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year
2018 CAMS (now Motorsport Australia) Gold Accredited Photographer
Finallist - 2014 NT Media Awards
"A bad day at the race track is better than a good day in the office"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TridenTBoy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: West coast, USA
     
May 21, 2011 19:45 |  #42

dmo580 wrote in post #12454220 (external link)
What shutter speeds are you getting right now in your shots?

1/50 at lowest I think for these low light situations. That's ISO 6400 too, f1.8

I'm saying when I am focusing on the subject they move.

EDIT: Example of people not moving much. At this ISO I think there is almost no detail possible? (1/50, 1.8, 6400, 50mm)
http://img689.imagesha​ck.us/img689/9421/img0​793b.jpg (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ok_Student3368
Senior Member
767 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
May 21, 2011 19:51 |  #43

TridenTBoy wrote in post #12454237 (external link)
1/50 at lowest I think for these low light situations. That's ISO 6400 too, f1.8

I'm saying when I am focusing on the subject they move.

And are they moving in and out of focus that much? I've done dance photos before and it's like they spin, move, turn, slide left right, move forward back, but it's not like they're charging at me. At most within a 2 second timespan where I focus, shoot, they haven't moved that much in terms of "away" from me.

Are you getting a full body shot or just head and shoulders? How close are you getting?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TridenTBoy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: West coast, USA
     
May 21, 2011 19:55 |  #44

dmo580 wrote in post #12454256 (external link)
And are they moving in and out of focus that much? I've done dance photos before and it's like they spin, move, turn, slide left right, move forward back, but it's not like they're charging at me. At most within a 2 second timespan where I focus, shoot, they haven't moved that much in terms of "away" from me.

Are you getting a full body shot or just head and shoulders? How close are you getting?

It depends. I'm trying to get full body or at least torso and above. Either way, it's hard for this thing to focus in low light. I'd have to demo it to you guys for you to believe me.

A room with a few strands of christmas lights is not a very bright room...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ok_Student3368
Senior Member
767 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
May 21, 2011 19:59 |  #45

Gotcha. Are you using single point AF? I suggest center point.

If they're moving left and right which is also changing distance, you need to learn how to pan. If they're moving towards and away from you like straight at you, your camera is really gonna strugle.

You can try AI Servo, but in low light itll suck.

You're not really gonna get way better performance with say a 1D or a faster lens. Center point AF is pretty solid on ANY camera because its not only a crosstype but also extra sensitive.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,387 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
How to tell if you're not getting a lemon?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1347 guests, 180 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.