Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 22 May 2011 (Sunday) 08:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

definitely need a much lighter hairlight

 
coeng
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: NJ
     
May 22, 2011 08:35 |  #1

Last night I was taking some shots of my kids in my home studio and had a scary moment. I went to move my hairlight stand just a foot and when I let go of it I forgot to wait until it stopped wobbling before I let it go. It came crashing down onto the hardwood floor and scared the living daylights out of me. Good thing no one was near it when it happened. The only damage I could tell was a rip in the side of the strip box which was attached to it. I used some black gaffer tape to cover the tear so I could continue shooting.

I was using a Genesis 200 on a Manfrotto 420 Combi boom stand with two 5 lb dumbells in the sandbag. This with the strip light and grid is just too heavy.

So needless to say I am in the market for a compact yet powerful hairlight. Especially since I am moving into a new house where my studio will be setup in my basement which has an 8' drop ceilings.

Any recommendations? What about modifiers?


5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
May 22, 2011 08:37 |  #2

Why not make the investment in better grip gear rather than adding or replacing a light?


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coeng
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: NJ
     
May 22, 2011 09:42 |  #3

TMR Design wrote in post #12456640 (external link)
Why not make the investment in better grip gear rather than adding or replacing a light?

Okay, I'm listening. What do you suggest? I thought the combi boom I have was very sturdy when I bought it.


5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FJ ­ LOVE
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,883 posts
Likes: 82
Joined Nov 2006
Location: barrie ont. ca
     
May 22, 2011 10:06 |  #4

wheels, heavy and precarious i use wheels :)


DILLIGAF about your bicycle or your gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
May 22, 2011 12:30 |  #5

coeng wrote in post #12456836 (external link)
Okay, I'm listening. What do you suggest? I thought the combi boom I have was very sturdy when I bought it.

The Manfrotto 085BS (external link) is a much sturdier and easier to use boom package. I have its predecessor and would not go with anything less.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
May 22, 2011 13:15 |  #6

The first rule for me is to have one leg under the boom arm that moves the pivot point much closer to the weight. Next, always move boom stands carefully. That's one advantage of wheels.

Third, put weight on base of stand as well as boom arm.

Fourth, or maybe first - get a stand with larger base as Rob suggests. Getting a smaller light is likely to be frustrating in other ways.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 22, 2011 13:17 |  #7

Wobbling stand, no good. It is accident waiting to happen.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
May 22, 2011 13:22 as a reply to  @ bobbyz's post |  #8

Even a good stand with a boom will present problems if you've got a strobe and lightbox flying 6 feet off the end of the boom.

A counterweight on the boom arm is a good thing but more important to the overall stability is weight at the center of gravity.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
May 22, 2011 13:27 |  #9

Think about vectors.
A 2 pound weight 6 feet from the stand vertical member is less stable with a 12 lb weight one foot from the stand on the other end of the boom than two two lb weights each 6 feet from the stand.

And in either case, the whole thing is more stable with more weight at the base of the stand than on the boom. That's one major advantage of a Century stand. The legs are low with part of the leg parallel to the ground so its easy to put sand bags over them to weigh down the base. (This is essentially what Rob said but with a detailed example :-) )


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,933 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2277
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
May 22, 2011 13:39 |  #10

SkipD wrote in post #12457549 (external link)
The Manfrotto 085BS (external link) is a much sturdier and easier to use boom package. I have its predecessor and would not go with anything less.

I've got this stand and boom, it's a nice set up, only thing I'd do different is air cushion and an extra extension for height.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
May 22, 2011 14:00 |  #11

Higher is best with a large diameter main stand tube and adding lots of weight at the base.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Loft ­ Studios
Goldmember
1,072 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
     
May 22, 2011 15:06 |  #12

coeng wrote in post #12456836 (external link)
Okay, I'm listening. What do you suggest? I thought the combi boom I have was very sturdy when I bought it.

Although you could probably use a much better boom stand, the true culprit here was not using enough weight to counter-balance your flash head nor your stand. I'm going to take a rough stab at this and say that the Genesis 200 along with a typical strip box with grid is going to weigh in a about 6-8lbs. You say you had only 10lbs. as a counter-weight. That, unfortunately is not enough.....

Here's a standard use and amount of weight one should generally use "safely" when utilizing a boom.....
1.) Use twice the amount of what the flash head and modifier is as a counterweight..... (in your case 15lb.)
2.) Then, also use twice the amount of what the flash head and modifier is as leg weights on 2 of your 3 tripod legs..... (meaning you should have 15lbs. on one leg and 15lbs. on the other..... the leg with no weight should be facing the same direction of the boom arm)

Now what you have will probably work and probably has worked in the past. But being carefull and making sure you don't bump into the stand or walking slowly away from the light stand with wishfull thinking in hopes that it doesn't fall over is ludicrous. What I'm suggesting may seem like a lot of weight and un-necessary, but buying a more expensive, more bigger, more popular boom stand still requires proper counter-balance on the boom arm as well as the legs. Again, the stand that you have is good enough, the key to your solution is "Proper Counter-Balance".....

You wouldn't want to have a serious head injury to a model or in your case, at that time, one of your kids, or worse.....someone else's kid. All it takes is ONE TIME to crack someone in the head with you falling light stand and you're get the picture (No Pun intended...)

Best of Luck!


MARK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dchen99
Senior Member
860 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Illinois, USA
     
May 22, 2011 15:07 |  #13

coeng wrote in post #12456836 (external link)
Okay, I'm listening. What do you suggest? I thought the combi boom I have was very sturdy when I bought it.

The load capacity for Manfrotto 420 Combi is only 4.5 lbs!!!
Also it sounded you didn't have sand bags or weights to stabilize the stand. The conterweight is supposed to balance the load, you still need something to add on the bottom of the stand.


www.flashonstudio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coeng
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: NJ
     
May 23, 2011 08:59 |  #14

dchen99 wrote in post #12458262 (external link)
The load capacity for Manfrotto 420 Combi is only 4.5 lbs!!!

From B&H:
When used as a boom stand, its maximum load is 4.5 lbs (2 kg) -- strong enough for a small light fixture with a small softbox or umbrella. A sandbag counterweight is supplied (empty) and recommended whenever boom is extended.

Isn't this what I did? Or is the Genesis 200 not considered a small light fixture? I didn't weigh the light and the strip box to make sure it was under 4.5 lbs but I figured it was designed to hold what I had. I had two 5 lb dumbells in the sandbag.

In any case, I'm moving into a new house in a few weeks and my overhead space in my proposed studio area (the basement) is only going to be 8 feet. So I definitely need to consider finding a compact hair light. I would even consider a simple railing system if it would help save on vertical space.


5D2, 600 EX-RT, STE-3, 24-70L, 70-200L f/2.8 IS II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
May 23, 2011 09:11 as a reply to  @ coeng's post |  #15

Maximum load is quite different from maximum stability.

You said that the stand wasn't falling over. That's essentially what the spec says.

I can 'balance' things with a 600 Watt second strobe and 54" x 72" softbox on the end of a 6 foot boom and mounted to a heavy duty light stand and all the numbers are within tolerance... BUT, I would never use that combination without adding extra weight to the center of gravity at the base of the light stand for extra stability.

If you're working with clients you really want to make everything 'spill proof' and almost overcompensate to eliminate all the iffy and unstable grip gear.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,392 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
definitely need a much lighter hairlight
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2799 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.